Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Trump Campaign Alleges ‘Unlawful and Unconstitutional Acts’ by State Officials in Wisconsin Recount Lawsuit

    Trump Campaign Alleges ‘Unlawful and Unconstitutional Acts’ by State Officials in Wisconsin Recount Lawsuit

    “We have alleged in our Complaint on behalf of the President that the Wisconsin Elections Commission and other state and local officials in Wisconsin broke the Wisconsin Election Code and ran an unconstitutional and unlawful election.”

    https://youtu.be/AkL5j_huCPc
    Listen to this article

    President Donald Trump’s campaign filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the Wisconsin Elections Commission and others, accusing them of “unlawful and unconstitutional acts” during the recount of the 2020 presidential election.

    They filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division.

    Bill Brock, Trump’s lead counsel in the Wisconsin federal suit, said the campaign accuses the officials of breaking “Wisconsin Election Code” in the recount:

    “The United States Constitution prevents the rules in a Presidential Election from being changed at the last minute by un-elected bureaucrats and local politicians who may have a more narrow interest in the outcome of the election. We have alleged in our Complaint on behalf of the President that the Wisconsin Elections Commission and other state and local officials in Wisconsin broke the Wisconsin Election Code and ran an unconstitutional and unlawful election. Nothing is more important to our national fabric and future than integrity in our electoral process. This lawsuit is one-step in the direction of fairer, more transparent, more professional and ultimately more reliable elections in America.”

    The lawsuit names Wisconsin Secretary of State Douglas La Follette, but a Wisconsin elections clerk noted on Twitter that the secretary “had nothing to do with election administration” along with the City of Milwaukee Clerk.

    The woman mentioned the lawsuit only named five of the six Wisconsin Elections Commission members. It did not name Julie Glancey.

    The campaign noted these key allegations within the lawsuit:

    • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission undercutting Wisconsin’s Photo Identification Law.
    • A Plan by the Mayors of Wisconsin’s five largest cities (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay and Racine) and funded by an out-of-state organization known as the Center for Tech & Civic Life to implement a new form of balloting in Wisconsin using un-manned, absentee ballot drop boxes without adequate or uniform chain of custody standards and security protocols contrary to the Wisconsin Election Code.
    • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission that facilitated the unlawful, un-manned absentee ballot drop box Plan by endorsing illegal drop boxes (which were then ultimately used throughout the State in the election), failing to adopt uniform chain of custody and security protocols for the ballots in the drop boxes and failing to ensure public access to the process.
    • Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission to election officials to tamper with witness certifications on absentee ballot envelopes which facilitated the counting of unlawful ballots in the election in violation of the Wisconsin Election Code.

    The campaign already asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to throw out 221,000 ballots in Dane and Milwaukee counties.

    Municipal, county, and state authorities ruled the ballots valid and legal, including “in-person absentee ballots without an associated written application, incomplete and altered absentee ballots, indefinitely confined absentee ballots and ballots collected at Madison’s Democracy in the Park event.”

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    alaskabob | December 3, 2020 at 2:45 pm

    Considering the present mindset of Democrats, it is hard not to see that the bar is set abnormally high for any Republican challenge to status quo interpretations by courts. The Wis SC just chunked the suit. Hearsay and rumor are grounds for “investigations” of Trump with process crimes created for those around him but sworn statements and evidence here is deemed inadmissible. This is not superficial bias but deep seeded dislike (hate) that is seamless to their thought processes. As Douglas Murray describes it.. go to a movie and at the end, the whole movie outcome is 180 degrees apart for the Left and Right viewing the same film. It’s helpless and now going to hopelessness… and that is the whole ball game.

    It’s quite telling that Democrats don’t have DINOS, that they all root for the doctor to kill the baby, all believe in taxation, regulation and confiscation, all hold the anonymous collective of socialism superior to the personal and individual soul.

    The lie at the heart of deviancy is that there is absolutely no absolute truth, that one thing can be another and that I’m entitled to believe that is absolutely true.

    Further, they contend that moral values are arbitrary and subjective and that ‘the golden rule’ and the Decalogue are impositions on their freedom,lol, whatever that is now.

    This is progressivism: i can lie because there is no truth. I can kill because I have a reason to. I can claim human nature is in con-stant shift so I’m never responsible for my person or nature, certainly not my colorless, indivisible, odorless, immortal, weightless, immaterial spiritual, soul.

    However, human nature never changes because then it wouldn’t be human nature. You’d have no reference. One thing can never be another because you would not have the order of creation so necessary to defying it.
    You wouldn’t be you.
    You would not have the soul you must have to prove you don’t have one.

    The whole contraption consists of persons who don’t know where the good God met their parents and formed them having known them before they existed and will always know them. There is a father of lies and the Truth is Crucified.

    Just read wisconsin’s liberal hack judges and one wuss rino denied Trump a hearing on his lawsuit.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend