Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    While You Were Focused on The Kraken, the Senate Continued Confirming Trump Federal Judges

    While You Were Focused on The Kraken, the Senate Continued Confirming Trump Federal Judges

    Long ago Mitch McConnell vowed to leave no federal judicial vacancy unfilled by the end of Trump’s first term. That promise is close to being kept despite Democrat and media outcry.
    Listen to this article

    Mitch McConnell long ago promised to leave no federal court vacancy unfilled by the end of Trump’s first term. Depending on what happens in the next three weeks, this may be Trump’s only term and McConnell has continued moving judicial nominations through to confirmation.

    Needless to say, Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) are not happy, particularly as Republican’s move to fill a vacancy on the First Circuit caused by the death of a judge, and the vacancy on the 7th Circuit caused by Amy Coney Barrett joining the Supreme Court.

    Bloomberg News cries:

    Senate Republicans are racing ahead with post-election judicial confirmations, breaking a 123-year tradition against voting on judicial nominees of an outgoing president of the defeated party during a lame duck session.

    The Senate has confirmed six district court nominees since reconvening after the Nov. 3 election that saw Democrat Joe Biden defeat President Donald Trump. Trial court nominees confirmed this week included another Trump nominee rated unqualified by the American Bar Association.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also wants to confirm Trump’s two remaining circuit picks whose nominations arose after Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s elevation to the Supreme Court from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the death of a First Circuit judge….

    We’re going to run through the tape,” McConnell said to conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt after Barrett’s confirmation on Oct. 30. “We go through the end of the year, and so does the president.”

    The next roll call votes are scheduled for Nov. 30.

    Axios notes that the senate just confirmed the youngest District Court judge:

    The Senate on Wednesday confirmed lawyer Kathryn Kimball Mizelle to a lifetime judgeship on U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in a 49-41 vote.

    Why it matters: It’s the sixth Trump-appointed district judge the Senate has confirmed since Election Day, breaking with the body’s tradition against approving nominees of a lame-duck president.

    • Even after losing the presidential election, Trump and Republicans have continued to reshape the judiciary at a blistering pace with a slew of young, conservative judges.
    • The Senate had only once approved the nominee of a president who lost re-election since 1987, Brookings Institution fellow Russell Wheeler told Bloomberg Law.

    The big picture: Democrats have criticized the Washington, D.C.-based lawyer’s record, arguing she has never tried a criminal or civil case as lead or co-counsel.

    • The 33-year-old, who has eight years of legal experience, is President Trump’s youngest judicial appointment. She would be among the youngest federal judges in the U.S.
    • A substantial majority of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee gave Mizelle a “Not Qualified” rating for the position, citing the “short time she has actually practiced law and her lack of meaningful trial experience.”
    • The other side: Republicans have touted Mizelle’s resume, which includes a clerkship with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

    The leftist American Constitutional Society updates the scorecard as of today:

    The Senate continued to advance and confirm judicial nominees this week, instead of dealing with the ongoing pandemic or the potential upcoming federal government shutdown. Five Article III judges were confirmed by the Senate: Kristi Johnson (S.D. Miss.) in a 53-43 vote; Benjamin Beaton (W.D. Ky.) in a 52-44 vote; Toby Crouse (D. Kan.) in a 50-43 vote; Stephen Vaden (Ct. Int’l Trade) in a 49-43 vote; and Kathryn Mizelle (M.D. Fla.) in a 49-41 vote. Mizelle, who is only 33 years old, was rated as “Not Qualified” by a substantial majority of the American Bar Association, in large part due to her lack of experienceMizelle is the tenth nominee during this administration to receive a “Not Qualified” rating from the ABA. These confirmations bring the total number of Article III judges confirmed under this administration to 227.

    On Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing for four Article III nominees: Thomas Kirsch II (7th Cir.); Charles Atchley Jr. (E.D. Tenn.); Katherine Crytzer (E.D. Tenn.); and Joseph Dawson III (D.S.C.). Kirsch II has been nominated to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals seat that only became vacancy in late October when then-Judge Amy Coney Barrett was elevated to the U.S. Supreme Court. The hearing primarily focused on originalism and how it applies in the seminal Brown v. Board of Education case.

    After confirming the five judges this week, the Senate went on recess for the Thanksgiving holiday. However, before leaving for recess Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell scheduled a cloture vote for a district court nominee on the day the Senate is set to return from recess. Despite being in a lame duck session, it appears the Republican Senate majority will continue confirming judicial nominees up until Inauguration Day.

    As of November 19, there are 55 Article III vacancies, 52 of which are current. Once the remaining nominees are officially nominated, there will be 30 pending nominees: 6 waiting for floor votes, 4 waiting to be reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and 20 waiting for hearings before the Committee.

    As of today, the 227 Article III (lifetime appointment) judges have been nominated by Trump and confirmed by the Senate, including three Supreme Court Judges and 53 Court of Appeals judges. The total will be over 250 by year end. That represents almost one-third if the authorized Article III judgeships. That represents a powerful pushback to the leftist activist tilt the judiciary has taken on, but is not the massive restructuring that a second Trump term would accomplish.

    Unless The Kraken really is released, it appears this series of “While You Were” posts may be coming to an end soon. For the historical record:


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    “Senate Republicans are racing ahead with post-election judicial confirmations, breaking a 123-year tradition against voting on judicial nominees of an outgoing president of the defeated party during a lame duck session.”

    Joe Biden did not win the election. He and his Party may seize power in January, but he is illegitimate from the start.

    And it is weird when the Joseph Goebbels media – which refused to concede the 2016 presidential election, openly calls for mass arrests and even violence against Trump supporters, encourages unelected bureaucrats and high ranking military officers to ignore the legal commands of elected officials, calls raping, rioting, burning and looting by leftist mobs “mostly peaceful protests” – is suddenly worried about preserving traditions.

    Perhaps if the media stopped trying to get anyone who disagrees with them killed they would receive more of a sympathetic hearing….,,

    Great news.
    Let’s not be dissin’ the kraken… 🙂

    Dusty Pitts | November 19, 2020 at 8:20 pm

    Suck it, Schumercrats.

    Frezz in the hizzy | November 19, 2020 at 8:26 pm

    Mitch looks like some doughy grandfatherly type, but he’s really a stone-cold pimp…….

    As touched on previously, the real magic of the tenure of PDJT is how he forced the hand of friend and foe alike to show exactly who and what they are, and brought the reality of situations, such as electoral abuse, to light.

    Thank you, sir! God bless you and your family!

    Frezz in the hizzy | November 19, 2020 at 8:30 pm

    And threatening to release the Kraken is some strong smack. I hope she can back it up!

      After Tucker Carlson’s comments tonight, I’m worried about that. He stated that after she was on his show he (his producer?) asked for available proof. After not getting any and multiple requests to Sydney, Sydney told them to quit bothering her. Carlson is still open to evaluating any evidence, but frankly when you claim to have evidence and then refuse to provide same, it is worrisome. I have a higher opinion of Sydney than that response would indicate is deserved.

      While Sydney is the subject, what is the alleged judge Sullivan doing to drag things out now?

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend