Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03
    Announcement
     
    Announcement
     

    Confirmed: Media Collusion To Smother Biden Influence Peddling Scandal Worked

    Confirmed: Media Collusion To Smother Biden Influence Peddling Scandal Worked

    This is what collusion looks like.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX3LmkHrho4
    Listen to this article

    The New York Post‘s story on Hunter Biden took off on social media right before the election. It received more attention than failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s emails during the home stretch of the 2016 election.

    But Joe Biden’s campaign team noticed that it did not persuade many people to vote against Biden. They discovered it’s because the mainstream media didn’t pick it up.

    We all knew the MSM wouldn’t touch the stories coming from The New York Post. Twitter and Facebook tried to stop people from sharing it, but that only made people talk about it even more on the platforms. They eventually caved.

    The Daily Beast did itself no favors with its post. I think the fact that the Hunter Biden story never resonated with voters because of MSM suppression is newsworthy. The Daily Beast made the article about the Democratic Party losing the social media war.

    George Stephanopoulos did not ask Joe Biden about Hunter’s laptop and emails during an ABC town hall on October 16.

    NPR confirmed on October 22 it refused to cover the Hunter Biden story because it didn’t “want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories” or waste their audience’s “time on stories that are just pure distractions.”

    On October 30, NBC News decided to debunk an old Hunter Biden non-story as a way to distract from the actual story. If you could make it past the headline and beginning of the story you would get confirmation from NBC News that the story did not have any connection to Biden’s laptop.

    Glenn Greenwald resigned from The Intercept, which he co-founded, because the editors did not want to run his story on Hunter Biden:

    The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors, in violation of my contractual right of editorial freedom, censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all New-York-based Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression.

    The censored article, based on recently revealed emails and witness testimony, raised critical questions about Biden’s conduct. Not content to simply prevent publication of this article at the media outlet I co-founded, these Intercept editors also demanded that I refrain from exercising a separate contractual right to publish this article with any other publication.

    Greenwald recently criticized CNN for allowing Rep. Adam Schiff to lie on national TV:

    “[Wolf Blitzer] asked him a rhetorical question embedded with baseless assumptions: ‘does it surprise you at all that this information Rudy Giuliani is peddling very well could be connected to some sort of Russian government disinformation campaign?'” Greenwald wrote Thursday. “Schiff stated definitively that it is: ‘we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin,’ adding: ‘clearly, the origins of this whole smear are from the Kremlin, and the President is only too happy to have Kremlin help in amplifying it… ‘there it is in the Oval Office: another wonderful propaganda coup for Vladimir Putin, seeing the President of the United States holding up a newspaper promoting Kremlin propaganda.”

    He continued, “Schiff, as he usually does when he moves his mouth, was lying: exploiting CNN’s notorious willingness to allow Democratic officials to spread disinformation over its airwaves without the slightest challenge. Schiff claimed certainty about something for which there was and still is no evidence: that the Russians played a role in the procurement and publication of the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.”

    Greenwald ended his latest post with a great mic drop:

    “Yet again we find that the most prolific propagators of Fake News and disinformation are not the enemies of the mainstream U.S. media. It is the mainstream U.S. media itself that deceives, propagandizes and spreads disinformation on behalf of the coalition of the intelligence community and the Democratic Party far more than any other faction or entity.”

    But this also shows that old media has not fully died out yet. We all think print is dead and online media is the king right now.

    It doesn’t happen overnight. I remember the right being convinced in 2012 that Mitt Romney was going to win because they won the social media war that year.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     4
    Moon Battery | November 16, 2020 at 3:38 pm

    This is media malpractice and election interference by suppression of information. Bet the MSM won’t report on Biden’s “Cancer Center” which gave nothing to fight cancer, but only paid staff.


       
       0 
       
       8
      theduchessofkitty in reply to Moon Battery. | November 16, 2020 at 3:54 pm

      Biden fights cancer the same way the ACLU defends “civil liberties” and the SPLC is concerned about Southerners, poverty, and laws.

      Which means, not at all, and with not one dime.


         
         0 
         
         2
        Milhouse in reply to theduchessofkitty. | November 16, 2020 at 6:06 pm

        The ACLU used to support civil liberties, and occasionally still does out of muscle memory or something. Amnesty International used to be good guys. I’m told the same is true of SPLC, but I don’t believe it.


       
       0 
       
       2
      Paul in reply to Moon Battery. | November 16, 2020 at 6:25 pm

      Why would they? They previously failed to report on the Clintoon “Foundation” which did the same basic thing for a couple of decades, grifting hundreds of millions of dollars from corporations and countries that had business before Hillary’s Dept of State.

      It was graft of the highest form, until Gropey Joe and his crime family showed the Clintoons to be hillbilly pikers. Hundreds of millions in graft? Hah, that’s nothing! The Biden’s take BILLIONS.

      Yes, with a B.


     
     0 
     
     7
    alaskabob | November 16, 2020 at 3:46 pm

    Conservative sites are now being deplatformed. Conservative Treehouse got this from WordPress:

    “Given the incompatibility between your site’s content and our terms, you need to find a new hosting provider and must migrate the site by Wednesday, December 2nd.”

    The Purge has started even though… or better yet….there has been no EC vote on a president. The extent of the “influence” by the Left is far more than I would ever have thought.


       
       0 
       
       4
      Valerie in reply to alaskabob. | November 16, 2020 at 5:20 pm

      It’s no surprise, at all Conservative Treehouse is effective and has a huge audience. They are being shut down now because they are credible and they do not want the uninformed voters to become informed.


     
     0 
     
     6
    TX-rifraph | November 16, 2020 at 3:52 pm

    “…it did not persuade many people to vote against Biden.”

    Based on the fraud, it appears we do not know how people voted based on the public numbers. It may have persuaded 80% to vote against Biden. How one votes and how that vote is tabulated are connected but independent events. The corrupt Dems know this.

    First, who said it ‘worked’? So far, the election is proving to be rigged.

    Second, the media is not sworn to do anything. AG Barr is.

    In conclusion: this disaster (a very well final disaster for our currently formed nation) rests squarely in the laps of two titanic rats: Jeff Sessions and William Barr, both of whom swore the following: “I will support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

    Sessions and Barr belong on the same gallows as obama, clinton, biden and kerry.


     
     0 
     
     1
    MrSatyre | November 16, 2020 at 6:10 pm

    Does anyone here seriously believe this worked?

    In order for it to have worked, you would have to believe that had the MSM reported on it objectively their audience would have radically (but I repeat myself) their own belief system.

    We have seen countless times that when confronted with evidence and facts contrary to their hyperbole, Leftists and Liberals alike continue to ignore them.

    So no, this cover-up did not work. It changed absolutely nothing.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend