Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Researcher Finds Big Tech Manipulated 2020 Election: “Google’s Search Results Were Strongly Biased in Favor of Liberals and Democrats”

    Researcher Finds Big Tech Manipulated 2020 Election: “Google’s Search Results Were Strongly Biased in Favor of Liberals and Democrats”

    Dr. Robert Epstein has been warning about this for a while.
    Listen to this article

    In his opening monologue last night, Tucker Carlson talked about how big tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter affected the outcome of the 2020 election.

    He suggested that they acted on behalf of just one party, the Democrats.

    As an example, just look at Twitter’s suspension of the New York Post over their reports on Hunter Biden just before the election.

    To expand on this point, Tucker brought on Dr. Robert Epstein, a Democrat who has been following the influence of big tech on American politics.

    Last year, Epstein predicted on Tucker’s show that big tech companies like Google could shift up to 15 million votes.

    Watch the whole segment below:

    In June of 2019, Robert Epstein testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about Google’s power and influence. Here’s an excerpt of his testimony:

    I am Dr. Robert Epstein, the proud father of five children, a resident of California, and Senior Research Psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology. I love America and democracy, and I am also not a conservative. I have been center/center-left my whole adult life. You’ll see in moment why this fact is relevant to my testimony.

    I am here today for three reasons: to explain why Google presents a serious threat to democracy and human autonomy, to explain how passive monitoring systems can protect us both now and in the future from companies like Google, and to tell you how Congress can immediately end Google’s worldwide monopoly on search. My plan for ending that monopoly was published just yesterday (Monday, July 15, 2019) by Bloomberg Businessweek (Epstein, 2019d). I am attaching a copy of my article to my testimony and respectfully request that it be entered into the Congressional Record.

    This is a concrete example Epstein offered to illustrate one of the ways Google uses its influence:

    In the weeks leading up to the 2018 election, bias in Google’s search results may have shifted upwards of 78.2 million votes to the candidates of one political party (spread across hundreds of local and regional races). This number is based on data captured by my 2018 monitoring system, which preserved more than 47,000 election-related searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo, along with the nearly 400,000 web pages to which the search results linked. Strong political bias toward one party was evident, once again, in Google searches (Epstein & Williams, 2019).

    This will continue to be a problem until something is actually done about it. Hauling Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey before Congress for public scoldings is not cutting it.

    Featured image via YouTube.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    MattLauersNob | November 24, 2020 at 1:07 pm

    Stop watching Fox, period.

    Steer the vote. That said, don’t Google, search to increase [signal] diversity and reduce bigotry (i.e. [sanctimonious] hypocrisy).

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | November 24, 2020 at 2:04 pm


    Former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne:

    The Election Was Rigged Deeply – They Used the “Drop and Roll” Technique (VIDEO)


    President Trump set all new records for a sitting US president in a presidential election.

    President Trump’s coattails were deep and wide,

    winning at least 14 GOP seats in the US House, holding the senate and picking up seats in several state legislative bodies.

    But it wasn’t enough to beat Joe Biden. As we previously reported Democrats used the “Drop and Roll” technique to steal the states they needed for an improbable win with a senile candidate who hid in his basement all year.

    We posted on the “drop and roll” technique last week.

    Patrick Byrne discussed this technique with Christopher McDonald, “The used the ‘drop and roll’ technique. .. I think the Democrats have a long history of using black people in very pernicious ways… They’re using the black people as they have done for so many years… At a certain point in the election counting they essentially freeze and see how many ballots they need to get up over the guy who is actually winning and from then on they just set, whatever new batch that comes in is pre-figured. There are some states where they found 53 data points in a row. This will all be revealed in charts that will be coming public tomorrow…..”

    CorkyAgain | November 24, 2020 at 2:32 pm

    How different, really, are Big Tech’s actions from those of a small-town newspaper (or its regional and national cousins) taking an editorial stand in favor of one candidate and selecting publishing only the “news” that supports him?

    The press has done that more than not, and low-information voters have been influenced by it since the early days of the republic. But astute readers have never been unaware of, for example, the NY Times’s left-leaning bias (or, for that matter, of the right-leaning bias of the old Chicago Tribune.)

    In the current year, who but the lowest-information voter does NOT know which way Google, Twitter, and Facebook are leaning and what to expect will be found (or not found) on their platforms?

      CorkyAgain in reply to CorkyAgain. | November 24, 2020 at 2:33 pm

      Oops, “selecting publishing” s/b “selectively publishing”

      notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to CorkyAgain. | November 24, 2020 at 2:34 pm

      Time to get down to the Real Nitty Gritty.

      Local newspapers don’t enjoy government support like Big Tech.

      daniel_ream in reply to CorkyAgain. | November 24, 2020 at 2:42 pm

      Now, now, we can’t have any of that logic or common sense infecting our attempts to throw out the First and Fifth Amendments because SocialMediaBad.

        CorkyAgain in reply to daniel_ream. | November 24, 2020 at 4:58 pm

        Yes, you have sussed my meaning. They’re publishers, not common carriers, and have all the rights and responsibilities of their more traditional media brethren.

        I’m not a lawyer, but I think that by actively policing their users’ content and censoring anything counter to the Narrative, they’ve forfeited the immunity granted to a common carrier.

        When I was younger, I thought that the existence of competitors meant the absence of monopoly. But then I got a job at Microsoft during the 1990’s DOJ trial and learned that a large enough market share was sufficient. I can’t help but think that today’s Big Tech is open to prosecution along similar lines.

        I think it’s fair to say that they “influenced” the election. but it goes too far to say they “manipulated” it. I’d rather save that word for the Dominion software and for the poll workers who introduced fraudulent ballots, etc. in order to ensure their candidate’s victory.

      Finrod in reply to CorkyAgain. | November 25, 2020 at 4:39 pm

      Generally, the leader of your hometown newspaper has never been before the US Senate where they testified under oath that they weren’t pulling the dung they’ve been pulling.

    The biggest rat of all has turned out to be AG Barr.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend