Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Gun-Wielding Missouri Couple Who Attempted to Protect Home from Rioters Indicted on Two Felony Counts

    Gun-Wielding Missouri Couple Who Attempted to Protect Home from Rioters Indicted on Two Felony Counts

    “The government chooses to persecute us for doing no more than exercising our right to defend ourselves, our home, our property and our family and now we’re getting drug here time after time after time and for what?”

    https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1277415316352573440
    Listen to this article

    Tuesday, Mark and Patricia McCloskey were indicted on two felony counts — unlawful use of a weapon and evidence tampering.

    The Missouri couple was made famous after video showed them outside of the home, holding weapons as rioters marched through their neighborhood.

    From the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

    A St. Louis grand jury on Tuesday handed down indictments against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, charged in July with brandishing weapons at protesters outside the couple’s Portland Place mansion.

    The couple was indicted on felony charges of unlawful use of a weapon and evidence tampering. The indictments were filed under seal Tuesday. St. Louis Circuit Clerk Thomas Kloeppinger said a judge ordered the indictments suppressed but Kloeppinger didn’t know the reason.

    The grand jury added a count of evidence tampering after the Circuit Attorney’s Office in July charged the McCloskeys each with one count of unlawful use of a weapon — exhibiting.

    A spokeswoman for Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner could not be reached Tuesday.

    The McCloskeys’ lawyer Joel Schwartz said he didn’t know specifics about the charges but said he’s not surprised a grand jury indicted his clients.

    “I’ll certainly be interested in what was presented to the grand jury,” said Schwartz, who plans to request a transcript or recording of the proceedings, if such records were made.

    Earlier Tuesday, a St. Louis judge postponed the McCloskeys’ morning court appearance until next Wednesday.

    The charges filed in July say that on June 28, Mark McCloskey, 63, pointed an AR-15 rifle at protesters and Patricia McCloskey, 61, wielded a semiautomatic handgun, placing protesters in fear of injury.

    Outside the Carnahan Courthouse on Tuesday, Mark McCloskey criticized the City Counselor’s Office for opting against prosecuting protesters for trespassing in Portland Place, a private, gated street. Nine protesters were initially served police summonses, but City Counselor Michael Garvin said on Sept. 29 that trespassing charges would not be pursued.

    “The government chooses to persecute us for doing no more than exercising our right to defend ourselves, our home, our property and our family and now we’re getting drug here time after time after time and for what?” Mark McCloskey said. “We didn’t fire a shot. People were violently protesting in front of our house and screaming death threats and threats of rape and threats of arson. Nobody gets charged but we get charged.”

    The McCloskeys spoke at the RNC this year.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     1
    freddy33 | October 7, 2020 at 1:16 pm

    I’m of two minds on this. First, they were within their rights to defend themselves and the prosecutor is a nutjob making political hay (which is why she went after the ex-governor). But, these folks have made their fortune subjecting companies to the litigation hell that is the City of St. Louis court system. It is a well known plaintiff’s paradise. They have profited from the system and are now being subjected to the it.

    So, while I don’t support the idea of the prosecution, I have absolutely no sympathy for the McCloskeys.


     
     0 
     
     0
    faboutlaws | October 7, 2020 at 4:48 pm

    These defendants should be able to sue all nine tresspassers civilly for tresspassing. The results should be admissable at their criminal trial.


     
     0 
     
     0
    heyjoojoo | October 7, 2020 at 7:56 pm

    I’m confused. Which laws did they violate?


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend