Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    “if you want to know why Republicans *will* confirm a nominee this year, watch this video”

    “if you want to know why Republicans *will* confirm a nominee this year, watch this video”

    Lindsey Graham: “after the treatment of Justice Kavanaugh I now have a different view of the judicial confirmation process”

    Listen to this article

    I don’t think Democrats grasp how Republicans and Trump supporters feel about the mistreatment of Brett Kavanaugh at the hands of Democrats Senators, collaborators, and the media.

    It’s a raging fury that has not subsided. Not. One. Bit.

    They can’t understand because for Democrats trying to personallly destroy Republican nominees is baked into the confirmation cake. It doesn’t happen with every nomininee, but it happens with enough high-profile nominees to create a terror effect.

    So Republicans need to search for nominees without a blemish, and when they found one like Brett Kavanaugh, Democrats savaged him anyway.

    What happened to Kavanaugh can happen to any of us, and it is through the cancel culture that has migrated from campus to culture.

    Fuzzy put together a good roundup of the timeline of the brutalization of Kavanaugh, but for me there’s a moment that stands out among many others. It’s when Lindey Graham let loose as to the travesty his Democrat colleagues had perpetrated.

    This tweet by law professor Andy Grewal highlights Graham’s fury as reflecting why Republicans don’t care about Democrat complaints anymore and will confirm a nominee this year.

    You can analyze history and precedents. Or you can point out blatant Republican hypocrisy. Or you can point to Republicans’ mistreatment of Garland. But if you want to know why Republicans *will* confirm a nominee this year, watch this video.

    (video also here)

    Graham released a letter today focusing on the mistreatment of Kavanaugh as a turning point:

    Dear Senators Feinstein, Leahy, Durbin, Whitehouse, Klobuchar, Coons, Blumenthal, Hirono, Booker, and Harris,

    Like millions of Americans, I was shocked and saddened to hear of Justice Ginsburg’s death. Justice Ginsburg served honorably on the federal bench and was a trailblazer for women in the law. She will be missed.

    When the American people elected a Republican Senate majority in 2014, Americans did so because we committed to checking and balancing the end of President Obama’s lame duck presidency. We did so. We followed the precedent that the Senate has followed for 140 years: since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee during an election year.

    Because our Senate majority committed to confirming President Trump’s excellent judicial nominees-and particularly because we committed to supporting his Supreme Court nominees the American people expanded the Republican majority in 2018. We should honor that mandate.

    Also unlike in 2016, President Trump is currently standing for reelection: the people will have a say in his choices.

    Lastly, after the treatment of Justice Kavanaugh I now have a different view of the judicial confirmation process. Compare the treatment of Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh to that of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, and it’s clear that there already is one set of rules for a Republican president and one set of rules for a Democrat president.

    I therefore think it is important that we proceed expeditiously to process any nomination made by
    President Trump

    Mitch McConnell also spoke of the abuse of Kavanaugh in his speech today promising to push forward:

    Democrats don’t understand it because, to paraphrase a well-known observation, they don’t know anyone who supported Kavanaugh.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    oldgoat36 | September 21, 2020 at 6:56 pm

    If the candidate named has already been confirmed for a lower court, it makes it more difficult for the left to try bringing up a smear job. If the choice is indeed a woman, they are risking backlash from women swing voters who will see this is nothing different than what they did with Kavanaugh, based only on political affiliation.

    According to Ted Cruz, they have 51 votes. We shall see.

    I think the left will get some backlash from their public threats as well. They sound deranged, and few people want to give power to people who come off as deranged.

    Murkowski and Collins have already surrendered to the Communists, and Mitt Romneycare is likely to follow. Meanwhile, despite some vague noise about being independent from Manchin (which no one takes seriously) there are no Communists who will vote for confirmation.

    So Graham may be a changed person, but the Chamber of Commerce GOPe has not.

    The thing that struck me when I heard this from Sen. Graham during the Kavanaugh hearings was that this was the first time he really saw “his friends” and that he was shocked. He had never realized that they only cared about power. He, like many, didn’t really understand that President Obama and many others actually want to “fundamentally change the country” it is not just empty rhetoric.

    Oregon Mike | September 21, 2020 at 8:04 pm

    Mitch and Trump are no dummies. They’ve been preparing for this at least ever since Ruth disclosed she had what anybody with a lick of sense would have known is terminal cancer.

    Mitch wouldn’t be submitting this nomination to a vote if he didn’t have all his noses already counted.

    Blaise MacLean | September 21, 2020 at 8:10 pm

    Maybe the GOP should just publish Sen. Graham’s speech as an ad.

    Then cancel the hearings and just have a vote.

      ecreegan in reply to Blaise MacLean. | September 21, 2020 at 11:42 pm

      This is not only about putting another Justice who will keep his/her oath to the Constitution on the Supreme Court. This is also about inciting the Leftists to throw an embarrassing and dishonorable temper tantrum right before the election. I suspect that if McConnell and Trump could confirm a nominee with or without a Kavanaugh hearing they’d prefer with.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend