Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Democrat Operative Details His Involvement in Mail-In Ballot Fraud Schemes Going Back Decades

    Democrat Operative Details His Involvement in Mail-In Ballot Fraud Schemes Going Back Decades

    “This is a real thing,” the Democratic operative told the NY Post. “And there is going to be a f–king war coming Nov. 3rd over this stuff … If they knew how the sausage was made, they could fix it.”
    Listen to this article

    While Democrats and many in the mainstream media continue to erroneously claim mail-in ballot fraud doesn’t exist and that President Trump is conspiring with the USPS to remove mail drop boxes all over the country, some reporters out there are actually doing the investigative digging it takes to separate facts from fiction.

    The New York Post’s Jonathan Levine is one such journalist who is on the case as it relates to mail-in ballots and the potential they present for fraud. He filed an explosive report over the weekend detailing his interview with a Democratic operative who says he’s been directly involved in coordinating and participating in election fraud schemes involving mail-in ballots going back decades.

    Here are some of the highlights:

    Mail-in ballot fraud happens more often than most people think

    The operative, who claims he’s been involved in mail-in ballot fraud efforts in New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, told Levine that the types of ballot fraud President Trump and other Republicans have warned about is the rule in close races, not the exception:

    But the political insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he fears prosecution, said fraud is more the rule than the exception. His dirty work has taken him through the weeds of municipal and federal elections in Paterson, Atlantic City, Camden, Newark, Hoboken and Hudson County and his fingerprints can be found in local legislative, mayoral and congressional races across the Garden State. Some of the biggest names and highest office holders in New Jersey have benefited from his tricks, according to campaign records The Post reviewed.

    It all starts with the return envelope and a copy machine

    According to the anonymous operative, it all starts with obtaining the return envelope sent to voters along with their mail-in ballots:

    In New Jersey, for example, it begins with a blank mail-in ballot delivered to a registered voter in a large envelope. Inside the packet is a return envelope, a “certificate of mail in voter” which the voter must sign, and the ballot itself.


    The ballot has no specific security features — like a stamp or a watermark — so the insider said he would just make his own ballots.

    “I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.

    But the return envelopes are “more secure than the ballot. You could never recreate the envelope,” he said. So they had to be collected from real voters.

    He would have his operatives fan out, going house to house, convincing voters to let them mail completed ballots on their behalf as a public service. The fraudster and his minions would then take the sealed envelopes home and hold them over boiling water.

    “You have to steam it to loosen the glue,” said the insider.

    He then would remove the real ballot, place the counterfeit ballot inside the signed certificate, and reseal the envelope.

    The operative then noted that he’d make sure to get ballot handlers to put the ballots in multiple drop boxes instead of just one, to avoid triggering suspicion at the USPS.

    USPS workers are sometimes involved in the fraud

    According to Levine, the operative described how some postal workers would simply throw out ballots in Republican strongholds:

    “You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold … He can take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can just throw those in the garbage.”

    In some cases, mail carriers were members of his “work crew,” and would sift ballots from the mail and hand them over to the operative.

    In 2017, more than 500 mail-in ballots in New York City never arrived to the Board of Elections for races that November — leaving hundreds disenfranchised. They eventually were discovered in April 2018. “For some undetermined reason, some baskets of mail that were bound to the New York City Board of Elections were put off to the side at the Brooklyn processing facility,” city elections boss Michael Ryan said at the time of discovery.

    The operative also explained to Levine how ballot fraud happened in nursing homes, homeless shelters, and at the actual polling places themselves. Make sure to read the full report here and watch the interview he did today with Fox News’s Brian Kilmeade below for more insight:

    The bottom line, according to the operative, is that mail-in ballot fraud is a “real thing” that could be fixed:

    “This is a real thing,” he said. “And there is going to be a f–king war coming November 3rd over this stuff … If they knew how the sausage was made, they could fix it.”

    The problem here is that only one political side wants to lessen the likelihood of this type of election fraud happening, while the other side – including their allies in the mainstream press, willfully turns a blind eye to it because it’s politically advantageous for them to look the other way.

    — Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Without digging into the details, it is obvious that our voting process is seriously compromised on even the most superficial level. Just ask the question: “What has all of this technology and complication of what used to be a simple process accomplished? If it is to guarantee that everyone has a chance to cast their vote, what point is THAT is we can’t even count the votes correctly and on time?”

    We used to do this very well in one day when all we had were paper ballots. Now we can’t do it right even with all of the “experts” and modern technology. What other conclusion can we deduce that it doesn’t work? Let’s go back to where it works and not be in such a rush to make things “better”. Getting rid of all of the Phds and lawyers would be a great start. Hire some common sense farmers to run our elections.

      DaveGinOly in reply to Pasadena Phil. | September 2, 2020 at 5:13 pm

      Maybe it never really worked and never was really secure. Who knows how many elections could have been stolen when paper ballots and hand-counting was being done. It might seem secure to us, but given enough incentive, just about any system can be corrupted. But certainly, the way to go is to make it harder, not easier, to corrupt.

      Milhouse in reply to Pasadena Phil. | September 2, 2020 at 11:57 pm

      It never worked any better, we just didn’t use to expect instant results. Close races have always had to wait on postal ballots to arrive and be counted.

    2nd Ammendment Mother | September 2, 2020 at 10:46 am

    This is precisely the voter fraud I witnessed in El Paso and have described frequently.

    The Supreme Court is not the last word on what is and is not Constitutional. It may be for the government(s), but not for the people. The last word in our form of government is the people, armed: the militia.

    DaveGinOly | September 2, 2020 at 5:23 pm

    The Dems want:
    To eliminate the Electoral College
    To allow foreign nationals and illegal aliens to vote (along w/open borders)
    To make Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. states
    To pack SCOTUS by adding new justices (just as FDR did)
    To have all ballots collected by mail

    Does anyone doubt that every single one of these goals, if realized, would give them an advantage? How nakedly transparent has their quest for power and control have to be before people start to demand fairness, transparency, and (real) justice? What do the Dems have to do before most of America realizes that they don’t have the country’s interests in mind, only their own? Are mainstream Democrat voters actually in favor of unfair practices and do they believe that winning justifies the means? If power means that much to any political party, that party is not to be trusted with power; it has disqualified itself as a party worthy of trust.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend