Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    With several Republicans apparently succumbing on impeachment witnesses, Mitch McConnell may need to go ‘nuclear’

    With several Republicans apparently succumbing on impeachment witnesses, Mitch McConnell may need to go ‘nuclear’

    McConnell needs to go nuclear. Mutually Assured Destruction nuclear on witnesses — the Bidens or bust.

    The Wall Street Journal reports that Mitch McConnell has told Republican Senators that he does not have the votes to block witnesses:

    … at a meeting of all Republican senators late Tuesday, GOP leaders told their conference that they don’t currently have the votes to prevent witnesses from being called, people familiar with the matter said. Republicans had hoped to wrap up the trial with an acquittal of the president by this week, but Democrats have said he should appear under oath to offer a firsthand account of the president’s motivations for freezing aid to Ukraine—a matter at the heart of the impeachment case.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said the vote total wasn’t where it needed to be on blocking witnesses or documents, these people said. He had a card with “yes,” “no,” and “maybes” marked on it, apparently a whip count, but he didn’t show it to senators.

    As detailed many times, the entire Democrat strategy has been to Kavanaugh the hearings, to call witnesses the House never called in order to turn the trial into a circus in which the process becomes the punishment.

    The House impeachment was in bad faith, and the Kavanaughing of the hearings also is bad faith. That four Republican Senators may succumb to these tactics speaks volumes about the weakness of Republicans.

    We knew it would be close, but it looks like there may be only one choice for McConnell.

    Even Mitt Romney, the first link to break, has said that he thinks calling witnesses should be reciprocal. That means Joe and Hunter Biden, at minimum. But calling the Bidens in exchange for calling John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney has been rejected by Democrats.

    So McConnell’s way out it to force Democrats to reject a witness deal. That way, Democrats are the ones responsible for no new witnesses. It provides cover to people like Susan Collins who may be concerned how voting against witnesses my impact their reelection chances.

    McConnell needs to go nuclear. Mutually Assured Destruction nuclear on witnesses — the Bidens or bust.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    Mitch McConnel is no Slim Pickens!


     
     0 
     
     0
    robinkaty | January 29, 2020 at 10:55 am

    Why not Obama, what did you know and when did you know it. Did you know about Hillary? Did you know about Holder? So, you were aware of the spying on trump? Why didn’t you warn him so that he could be wary of what he discussed. You put an election over the security of the Nation?


     
     0 
     
     0
    Haiku Guy | January 29, 2020 at 11:00 am

    The Republicans should create a list of very lobbyist, every dirty dealer, every influence peddler, and every crony, wife, nephew or childhood friend who has been getting money based on a relationship with a Senator, and submit that as the list of potential witnesses.

    Let the Senators peruse that list, find all of those familiar names, and then decide if they want to call witnesses that would open up the biggest can of worms in US history.

    See if you can find the errors in this AP story ..
    https://apnews.com/c565f440467e4fd5cd6a11d7c8abc842

    THE FACTS: Trump was not under investigation before he took office.

    In fact, Trump says he was told that directly and repeatedly by then-FBI Director James Comey. Comey has said the same publicly.

    The FBI counterintelligence investigation dubbed Crossfire Hurricane was underway when Trump took office, but that was into whether his campaign more generally coordinated with Russia to tip the election. Agents were also looking criminally at several Trump aides, but that’s different from Trump being under investigation.

    Even if Bolton testifies to this claim, so what? Quid pro quo is part of everyday diplomacy. Enough of this goat rodeo.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend