Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    International Criminal Court Declines to Prosecute Israel Over 2010 Gaza Flotilla Incident

    International Criminal Court Declines to Prosecute Israel Over 2010 Gaza Flotilla Incident

    ICC Prosecutor: “There remains no reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJGsHB83pl0&t=13s

    The International Criminal Court (ICC) has declined to open an investigation against Israel over the 2010 Gaza flotilla incident.

    The decision came after the ICC appeals judges ordered their chief prosecutor to reconsider her previous rejection of calls for probe into the 2010 raid. In May 2013, Comoros, a small Muslim-majority Indian Ocean island country, approached the Hague-based tribunal to launch “war crimes” proceedings against Israel.

    ICC chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda rejected the call to open a “war crimes” probe into the 2010 raid of the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The Turkish ship was trying to breach the blockade placed by Israel to prevent weapons from entering Hamas-controlled Gaza.

    “There remains no reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation,” ICC chief prosecutor Bensouda said in a statement filed before the ICC. “[T]here is no reasonable basis to conclude that any potential case arising from the situation would be of sufficient gravity to be admissible before the court,” she added.

    Israeli broadcaster Arutz Sheva provided the background to the ICC prosecutor’s ruling:

    The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor Monday again said she will not press charges over a deadly 2010 Israeli raid on a flotilla bringing aid to Gaza, urging the probe to be shut.

    Fatou Bensouda’s decision comes three months after the judges of the tribunal based in The Hague ordered her for a second time to reconsider probing the case. (…)

    Bensouda said in 2014 that she would not prosecute Israel over the incident, saying it was “not of sufficient gravity” — which means the case could be determined as inadmissible before the ICC.

    Bensouda again affirmed the decision in 2017 after judges said she must take another look at the case. Israel itself is not a party to the court but its nationals could still be prosecuted.

    In a fresh setback for Bensouda after a number of high-profile failures, appeals judges in September ruled that she must once more examine whether to bring charges before court in The Hague.

    But despite criticizing Bensouda in unusually strong terms, the judges said it was ultimately up to the chief prosecutor whether to prosecute.

    In a 44-page reply to the judges’ order, Bensouda said she “maintains her view that the preliminary examination of this situation must be closed.”

    This conclusion, she said, was reached “on the basis of a careful analysis, conducted in good faith, within the legal framework” of the situation.

    Before the verdict, The Lawfare Project, a New York-based legal think tank involved with the case, had urged the ICC to “affirm the actions of the Israeli humanitarian soldiers who defended themselves against the brutal attack.”

    “We’re extremely pleased the Prosecutor agreed with our analysis and reaffirmed her decision,” Lawfare Project’s executive director Brooke Goldstein said on Monday. “It’s refreshing to see an international institution doing the right thing and standing up for law and justice rather than bowing to anti-Israel political pressure.”

    On May 31, 2010, the Israeli navy intercepted the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara along with five other ships attempting to break the blockade of Hamas-held Gaza. The Israeli naval operation began after several people ignored requests to redirect the boats to the nearest port of Ashdod for security inspection.

    People on the Turkish ship brutally attacked the Israeli soldiers with clubs and knives as they boarded the ship. Video footage corroborated Israeli claim that violent Islamists attacked its soldiers on board the vessel.

    “Roughly 40 people on board were jihadis who came for violence,” an Israeli government official said following the raid. “They were preparing to attack, to kill and to be killed.”

    Turkish newspapers confirmed at that time that three of the four Turks killed during the raid were ‘ready for martyrdom.’

    The Istanbul-based Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), a group linked to Islamic terrorist groups, organized the so-called Gaza flotilla.

    In 2014, Turkish police raided the IHH offices on charges of arming Al Qaeda affiliates in Syria.

    “Israel, world’s most moral army,” the former commander of British Forces in Afghanistan Richard Kemp.

    [Cover image via YouTube]

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


     
     0 
     
     2
    Dusty Pitts | December 3, 2019 at 9:15 am

    “You can’t base your decisions on the law here, this is the International Criminal Court!”


     
     0 
     
     2
    Tom Servo | December 3, 2019 at 10:31 am

    This headline might as well say “Bozo the Clown declines to Prosecute Israel for Bozo No-No’s!”

    well, good for you, Bozo, but don’t ask me to be impressed.


     
     0 
     
     1
    clintack | December 3, 2019 at 12:27 pm

    It’s sad that this is news, but it is.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Gremlin1974 | December 3, 2019 at 2:28 pm

    What is truly sad is that no one is calling out the obviously bias judges who continued to order the prosecutor to reconsider after she had given a perfectly reasonable and through explanation as to why prosecution was not warranted or appropriate.

    I have a great idea let’s call The Hague and see if they have room for the UN!

    Sadly the most probable outcome is that soon there will be a new Chief Prosecutor at the ICC that is more amicable to being browbeaten.


     
     0 
     
     1
    guyjones | December 3, 2019 at 3:01 pm

    Note how the useful idiot, Jew-hating Dhimmi-crats vilify and criticize Israel for having a blockade on Gaza, but never criticize the supremacist, totalitarian, belligerent and genocide-aspiring ideology of “Submission” and its bloodstained tenets, which make such a blockade necessary in the first place, simply because goose-stepping Arab Muslims believe that they have a right to kill or to subjugate non-Muslims.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend