Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Activists Vow Protests as Betsy DeVos Calls for Greater Protection of the Accused on Campus

    Activists Vow Protests as Betsy DeVos Calls for Greater Protection of the Accused on Campus

    “would require colleges to hold hearings at which a representative of each party has a right to cross-examine witnesses, including the other party, and to provide both students with all evidence gathered in the investigation”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBe8R3AlD1U

    Under Obama, the left advanced the narrative of “rape culture” on college campuses. The structure and rules surrounding the reporting of sexual assaults on campus sided overwhelmingly with accusers, and sometimes left the accused to be tried in campus kangaroo courts.

    As Trump’s Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos has tried to roll some of this back and return due process to campuses. Her efforts have been continually met with resistance.

    KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor, Jr. write at Real Clear Politics:

    Colleges Bristle as Judges, DeVos Push Protections for the Accused

    Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’ proposed Title IX regulations, which are due to be issued in final form early next year, seek to require colleges that adjudicate claims of sexual assault against their students using some of the same procedures to ensure fairness that have long been treated as fundamental by courts. The most important provisions would require colleges to hold hearings at which a representative of each party has a right to cross-examine witnesses, including the other party, and to provide both students with all evidence gathered in the investigation.

    But these proposals have generated furious opposition from pro-complainant activists and politicians willing to perpetuate the biases against accused students – procedures initiated by the Obama administration and with which most colleges were happy to comply. Alexandra Brodsky, a co-founder of Know Your IX, the nation’s most powerful pro-accusers’ rights organization, recently promised “massive national student resistance” to the effort to make campus procedures more even-handed.

    Josh Richards, a lawyer who regularly represents universities in lawsuits filed by accused students, dismissed cross-examination as being “without any meaningful addition in a truth-seeking function.” This view flies in the face of America’s founding principles, the Constitution, and longtime Supreme Court precedent. The high court has called the right to cross-examination “the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” Yet Sen. Patty Murray, the ranking Democrat on the Senate HELP Committee, is leading the effort to neuter the regulations’ cross-examination provisions, according to the Washington Post.

    DeVos is trying to protect due process, yet Alexandra Brodsky, the activist mentioned above, suggests that DeVos is trying to harm students’ civil rights:

    Taylor Mooney of CBS News provides some background on how we got here:

    How Betsy DeVos plans to change the rules for handling sexual misconduct on campus

    The 2011 Dear Colleague Letter urged schools to handle cases of sexual misconduct more promptly than ever before, stating that “If a school knows or reasonably should know about student-on-student harassment that creates a hostile environment, Title IX requires the school to take immediate action to eliminate the harassment, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects.” And it explicitly stated that schools must use “a preponderance of the evidence” as the standard for determining guilt in these proceedings; a finding of guilt means “it is more likely than not that sexual harassment or violence occurred.”

    The letter also “discourages” allowing the two sides to cross-examine each other, as it may be “traumatic or intimidating” for the alleged victim…

    For Mark Hathaway, an attorney who specializes in representing people who claim they were not provided their rights to due process in Title IX investigations, the 2011 letter does not do enough to protect the rights of the accused, allowing schools too much flexibility.

    “[The letter] doesn’t say, you know, four bullet points: You need to provide notice — adequate notice; you need to present the evidence; and you need to have a fair hearing,” says Hathaway. “None of those were laid out in a simple way that was understandable, so it allowed the schools to create rather complex, difficult-to-understand policies that don’t provide those protections.”

    Prior to 2011, the number of lawsuits filed against universities for failing to provide due process in Title IX cases averaged one per year. It is expected there will be over 100 such lawsuits filed in 2019 alone.

    Over the last several years, we have seen numerous examples of young people having their lives ruined based on nothing more than an accusation.

    College students deserve the same presumption of innocence and right to due process as all people. DeVos deserves credit for her efforts to return these rights to campuses.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     2
    amatuerwrangler | December 6, 2019 at 3:59 pm

    Hopefully the concept withholding federal funding from schools that do not provide constitutionally hearings, for all accusations of misdeeds, is within the “solution matrix”.

    Even a non-attorney dummy with horse s–t on his boots and sawdust in this pants cuffs can see that terminating someone’s education path is a “taking” under the 6th Amendment. Once adjudged by one of these tribunals the victim (not the accuser) is toxic to any institution.


     
     0 
     
     3
    Anchovy | December 6, 2019 at 4:10 pm

    Unless you are going to have police teach Intersectional Feminism, you probably not have professors of Intersectional Feminism act as police.

    If it is a crime report it to the police.

    As an attorney who represents students in these kinds of hearings, I can tell you that the universities are not interested in fair hearings–fish in a barrel have a better chance at survival than a lot of students who go before these committees and panels.

    Bad news for the fascist left.

    Given that Alexandra Brodsky has an identifiably Ashkenazi Jewish family name, it’s interesting to note she has an oddly National Socialist view of due process and rights of the accused.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend