Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Federal Judge Dismisses DNC Hacking Lawsuit Against Trump Team

    Federal Judge Dismisses DNC Hacking Lawsuit Against Trump Team

    “entirely divorced from the facts”

    Trump was just handed another legal win. A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit from the Democratic National Committee against the Trump team in the Wikileaks related hacking case of the 2016 election.

    Gregg Re reports at FOX News:

    Judge dismisses DNC hacking lawsuit against Trump team, says claims ‘entirely divorced from the facts’

    A federal judge in frank terms Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) against key members of the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over hacked DNC documents, saying they “did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place” and therefore bore no legal liability for disseminating the information.

    The ruling came as Democrats increasingly have sought to tie the Trump team to illegal activity in Russia, in spite of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings that the campaign in fact refused multiple offers by Russians to involve them in hacking and disinformation efforts.

    President Trump, in a tweet late Tuesday, noted that the judge in the case, John Koeltl, was appointed by Bill Clinton. The president called Koeltl’s decision “really big ‘stuff'” and “yet another total & complete vindication and exoneration.”

    Here are Trump’s tweets:

    Josh Gerstein of Politico has more from Judge Koeltl:

    Koeltl said such actions were protected by the First Amendment when taken by people not involved in the actual hacking.

    “Even if the documents had been provided directly to the Campaign [and] the Campaign defendants … they could have published the documents themselves without liability because they did not participate in the theft and the documents are of public concern,” the judge wrote in an 81-page opinion. “The DNC cannot hold these defendants liable for aiding and abetting publication when they would have been entitled to publish the stolen documents themselves without liability.”…

    “The DNC’s published internal communications allowed the American electorate to look behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United States during a presidential election,” Koeltl wrote. “This type of information is plainly of the type entitled to the strongest protection that the First Amendment offers.”…

    “The DNC’s interest in keeping ‘donor lists’ and ‘fundraising strategies’ secret is dwarfed by the newsworthiness of the documents as a whole,” the judge wrote. “If WikiLeaks could be held liable for publishing documents concerning the DNC’s political financial and voter-engagement strategies simply because the DNC labels them ‘secret’ and trade secrets, then so could any newspaper or other media outlet.”

    Another Democrat talking point just went up in smoke.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    It’s very funny for me when a judicial decision reflects things I have been saying for years as a layman. This is such a case.

    What I don’t understand about this decision is why, if it was a slam-dunk that any reasonable unbiased lawyer would know had no legs, the judge refused to sanction the DNC for wasting the courts time and engaging in frivolous law fare sueing…

    How awesome is Donald Trump?

    THIS awesome:

    Trump directs Navy to rescind medals for Eddie Gallagher’s prosecutors:

    That traitorous fraud obama nearly destroyed our military. The Donald has risen to the rescue.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Send this to a friend