Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Report: FBI Agents’ Texts Suggest Loretta Lynch Knew Outcome of FBI Hillary Probe in Advance

    Report: FBI Agents’ Texts Suggest Loretta Lynch Knew Outcome of FBI Hillary Probe in Advance

    FBI admits to losing five months worth of texts between these same agents

    Newly-released messages between two FBI agents who were then working on the Hillary Clinton email investigation show that they and possibly then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew in advance that no charges would be recommended by then-FBI Director James Comey.  The FBI has further admitted to “losing” five months worth of texts between these same FBI agents.

    On July 5, 2016, then-FBI Director Comey issued a statement about the FBI’s investigation into the Hillary Clinton email scandal.  This was the statement that effectively laid out the case against Hillary while simultaneously killing any chance that Hillary would be charged with any crimes because Comey did not see any “intent.”

    At the beginning of this July 5th statement, Comey stated, “I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.”

    Text messages between FBI agents working on the Hillary email investigation have since been released that show these two agents knew—on July 1st—that Hillary would be exonerated.  Not only did they know this on July 1st, but they discuss then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch being aware of the FBI’s decision on July 1st, days before Comey’s July 5th official recommendation to the DOJ.

    Remember it was on July 1st that Lynch announced she would defer to the FBI and accept their recommendation on Hillary email charges.  This followed the June 29th “tarmac summit” between Bill Clinton and Lynch.

    Fox News reports:

    The Justice Department has given various congressional committees nearly 400 pages of additional text messages between two FBI officials who were removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

    One of the newly discovered messages, lawmakers said, appeared to indicate that Peter Strzok and Lisa Page knew that charges would not be filed against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as a result of the investigation into her email server — before Clinton was interviewed by the bureau.

    Strzok and Page were pulled off the probe last summer after it emerged that some of their messages to each other included anti-Trump content. Strzok, an FBI counterintelligence agent, was reassigned to the Bureau’s human resources division after the discovery of the exchanges with Page, with whom he was having an affair.

    . . . .  One exchange between Strzok and Page, dated July 1, 2016, referenced then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s decision to accept the FBI’s conclusion in the Clinton investigation. Lynch’s announcement came days after it was revealed that the attorney general and former President Bill Clinton had an impromptu meeting aboard her plane in Phoenix.

    “Timing looks like hell,” Strzok texted Page.

    “Yeah, that is awful timing,” Page agreed. In a later message, she added: “It’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.”

    Four days later, then-FBI Director James Comey announced that no charges would be brought against Clinton, even though — as he put it — her actions in regard to the private server were “extremely careless.”

    The chronology:

    • June 29th:  Tarmac summit
    • July 1st: Lynch announces she’ll abide by FBI recommendation
    • July 1st: FBI agents mock Lynch announcement in texts, stating she already knows the outcome
    • July 5th: Comey statement recommending no charges in Hillary email investigation, prefaces statement with assertion that there was no coordination with DOJ and that they do not know what he was about to recommend.

    On top of this bombshell, the FBI has admitted to “failing to preserve” five months worth of texts between these two FBI agents.

    The Daily Caller reports:

    The FBI “failed to preserve” five months worth of text messages exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the two FBI employees who made pro-Clinton and anti-Trump comments while working on the Clinton email and the Russia collusion investigations.

    The disclosure was made Friday in a letter sent by the Justice Department to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (HSGAC).

    “The Department wants to bring to your attention that the FBI’s technical system for retaining text messages sent and received on FBI mobile devices failed to preserve text messages for Mr. Strzok and Ms. Page,” Stephen Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs at the Justice Department, wrote to Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of HSGAC.

    He said that texts are missing for the period between Dec. 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017.

    Boyd attributed the failure to “misconfiguration issues related to rollouts, provisioning, and software upgrades that conflicted with the FBI’s collection capabilities.”

    https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/955155972888170496

    If the revelation that Lynch likely knew in advance that Comey would recommend no charges was in the text messages the FBI didn’t lose, what on earth could be in the ones they did?

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     1 
     
     4
    regulus arcturus | January 22, 2018 at 9:18 am

      They already ‘had’ them, when they found the top secret server in klinton’s bathroom, her thousands of intentionally deleted emails, when the Prime Minister of Bangladesh stated klinton tried to shake her down for personal money while klinton was secretary of state.
      http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/11/bangladesh-pm-clinton-personally-pressured-her-to-aid-foundation-donor-despite-ethics-laws/

      The evidence is overwhelming. Remember: Sessions ‘recused’ himself. (Sessions stated he would step aside from the inquiry followed revelations that he had spoken in 2016 with the Russian ambassador.) Sessions should have either not recused himself, or he should have resigned. By recusing himself, he kicked himself upstairs to irrelevancy – while still retaining his perks. In other words, he has easy days in high office. (The usual GOPe modus operandi.)

        Remember the oath klinton took as secretary of state:
        “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

        Remember the oath loretta lynch took.
        Remember the oath james comey took.
        Remember the oath samntha power took.

        Now, remember the oath obama took:
        “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

        What bullsh-t, huh?

    Obama never hired an honest person to a position that had enough power to hurt him. I knew Lynch would be just as corrupt as Holder from the moment she was nominated.


     
     1 
     
     2
    Vascaino | January 22, 2018 at 12:41 pm

    ” FBI admits to losing five months worth of texts between these same agents ”

    May I call this Collusion?

      Collusion?

      Why not call it what it is: seditious conspiracy.

      “If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”
      https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384

      20 years in prison.

    That photo of a disgraced former AG must have been taken at least 30 years ago. If relying on that image, in real life, you might even identify her, based on it.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Solomon | January 22, 2018 at 8:40 pm

    I assume that other FBI agents used the exact same mobile devices as Strzok and Page during the same timeframe. The onus is on the FBI to show that those records were also irretrievably “lost.” If the glitch only affected Strzok and Page, the obvious conclude that someone is guilty of a serious felony.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend