Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    California sues to stop President Trump’s border wall

    California sues to stop President Trump’s border wall

    The Golden State’s war on the White House now strikes the national border.

    California’s lawfare targeting President Trump’s border security policies has escalated, hitting the centerpiece of the White House’s proposals: The Wall.

    State Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed a lawsuit alleging that President Trump’s proposal to expedite construction of a wall at the southern border violates environmental laws.

    Becerra announced the legal challenge standing in front of the existing border fencing at Border Field State Park near San Diego, saying the federal government failed to comply with federal environmental laws and relied on federal statutes that don’t authorize border wall projects in San Diego and Imperial counties.

    “No one gets to ignore the laws. Not even the president of the United States,” Becerra said. “The border between the U.S. and Mexico spans some 2,000 miles. The list of laws violated by the president’s administration in order to build his campaign wall is almost as long.”

    He said the project involves the improper waiver of 37 federal statutes, many aimed at protecting the environment.

    When environmental laws were put in place, they were designed to prevent the pollution of our air, protect our waterways from contamination, and ensure hazardous waste was properly and safety discarded. The over-reach of California’s politicians in using environmental measures, however, should have been anticipated: The tactics come straight out of the progressive policy handbook.

    The good news is that our politicians may be the North Korea of lawfare tactics.

    …At issue is a 2005 law that gave the Homeland Security secretary broad powers to waive dozens of laws for border barriers, including the National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Air Act and Endangered Species Act.

    The Trump administration has issued two waivers since August, both in California. President George W. Bush’s administration issued the previous five waivers in 2008.

    Legal challenges to border barriers have failed over the years amid concerns about national security. The Congressional Research Service said in a report this year for members of Congress that it saw no legal impediment to Trump’s proposed wall if deemed appropriate for controlling the border.

    Becerra had an opportunity to chat with U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions about the lawsuit.

    Asked about the lawsuits, Sessions said the U.S. government has a responsibility to secure the border.

    “We would expect to be fully successful in moving forward with our border wall as Congress gives us the money to do so,” Sessions said.

    …Becerra’s legal action is the latest in a series of suits he has filed against the administration. He recently sued over Trump’s decision to halt a program in six months that protects young immigrants from deportation.

    I am reminded that when the state of Arizona developed practical rules to actually enforce federal immigration law under then Governor Jan Brewer, it got into trouble because it went against Obama-administrations open-borders policy. When Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070 was partially stuck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, Becerra had this to say:

    Democratic Congressman Xavier Becerra (D-LA) told KPCC that he is worried about how the law might affect someone like his father, who speaks English with an accent and “certainly looks like he might be … from Latin America.”

    “What happens if he goes out and drives and forgets his driver’s license?” asked Becerra. “Do we have to go pick him up from an INS detention center?

    Becerra is nothing if not consistent…consistently self-centered.

    I would like to second Zerohedge’s proposal for a revised border wall plan:


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    I wonder if the US judicial; system will actually follow the language of the constitution:

    “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.} US Constitution; Article III, Section 2, clause 2.

    This case, along with every other case in which a State is a party, not only should, but MUST be heard in the SCOTUS. all the cases where states sued the Executive branch of the federal government should also have been heard, originally, in the SCOTUS by-passing all lower courts.

    healthguyfsu | September 21, 2017 at 9:10 pm

    How much of their taxpayers’ money are they willing to throw at litigious windmill tilting?

    It’s not like they have any shortfalls.

    tom swift | September 22, 2017 at 12:20 am

    He said the project involves the improper waiver of 37 federal statutes, many aimed at protecting the environment.

    Well, sure—we wouldn’t want to turn that area into a desert, or anything.

    beagleEar | September 22, 2017 at 7:39 am

    I’m trying to think of the downside to Kim’s hitting Los Angeles with one of his small but deliverable nuclear warheads. That would give us grounds to annihilate the regime and set an example. It would also be poetic justice for ten to a hundred thousand of the anti-Americans voting in the Los Angeles basin.

    Hm. Still trying to think of the downside here.

    As a resident of CA as you are, Leslie, I think Zerohedge’s proposal to include CA behind the wall (after we get out) may be the only answer now. Gov. Brown, on his own, without consulting the U.S. State Dept., is independently negotiating trade deals with China. CA is suing the U.S. legislature over bills that include the border wall, the US. Justice Dept. over its cessation of funding for sanctuary cities, and over several other measures designed to improve the lot of all Americans. CA’s far-left-wing politicians who now dominate the whole state have decided CA is no longer a part of the USA. Good riddance!!

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend