Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Why did Loretta Lynch need DOJ Talking Points about a meeting she alone attended?

    Why did Loretta Lynch need DOJ Talking Points about a meeting she alone attended?

    AG Jeff Sessions should order DOJ to stop fighting the FOIA requests and unmask the talking points

    People who tell the truth don’t need to remember which story to tell.

    Loretta Lynch apparently needed to remember which story to tell about her secret tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton, whose wife was under investigation for possible violations of national security laws relating to handling of classified information. Lynch was the only DOJ official present with Clinton. (Lynch’s husband also apparently was on the plane, though it’s unclear whether he participated in all of the conversation.)

    That meeting preceded by just a few days the FBI clearing Hillary Clinton.

    We detailed the history of the secret meeting, how it was discovered, and the DOJ attempt to hide information requested under FOIA in our recent post, Loretta Lynch used alias “Elizabeth Carlisle” to email about Bill Clinton tarmac meeting.

    In that post we discussed how emails and “talking points” obtained by Judicial Watch and the American Center for Law and Justice had been heavily redacted. The Free Beacon further reports that a senior DOJ official helped edit the talking points:

    One of former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s top lawyers at the Justice Department helped edit Obama administration press statements about the infamous meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton on a tarmac last summer.

    The same attorney, Paige Herwig, is now the deputy general counsel for Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. That panel is now investigating whether Lynch played any role in trying to influence the scope or intensity of the FBI’s investigation into the Hillary Clinton email scandal….

    Newly released Justice Department emails show that Herwig, whose title was counselor to the attorney general at the time, helped edit the first media statement responding to inquiries about the tarmac meeting….

    The emails show that on June 29, 2016, two days after the Clinton-Lynch meeting when the national news media was first learning of the tarmac one-on-one, Melanie Newman, the then-director of public affairs at the Justice Department, emailed her FBI counterpart to “flag” the media stories about the tarmac meeting that she noted were “gaining traction tonight.” …

    Additionally, Lynch’s deputy chief of staff contacted Comey’s chief of staff and counselor, Jim Rybicki, July 1 but the email string noting that contact is heavily redacted.

    This raises numerous important questions, including this one: Why would Loretta Lynch need others at DOJ to draft talking points about a meeting at which Lynch was the only DOJ official present?

    I certainly understand that Lynch may have wanted professional advice on how to spin the meeting, messaging not massaging the facts.

    Until we see the unredacted talking points, and all the drafts, we won’t know for sure whether the facts and truth were just messaged, or whether they were massaged.

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions should order DOJ to stop fighting the FOIA requests and unmask the talking points.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     3
    Anchovy | August 10, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    Our former Affirmative Action Administration could screw up Liberia.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Scrollock in reply to Anchovy. | August 10, 2017 at 7:53 pm

      I thought he DID. Wasn’t that one of the countries rampaged by the Arab Spring? I detest how so many of his EOs are still in effect. Could be we’re gonna find out the country is too screwed up to recover. I hope not, but I’m not seeing near as strong a pulse as I’d like. The stock market is just another bubble – think aneurysm. When that sucker pops, it gonna bleed our wallets out bad.


         
         0 
         
         0
        Milhouse in reply to Scrollock. | August 11, 2017 at 2:43 am

        Um, no, it wasn’t. Where could you possibly have got such an idea? Liberia is not an Arab country, so how could it possibly be affected by the Arab Spring?


           
           0 
           
           1
          healthguyfsu in reply to Milhouse. | August 11, 2017 at 5:48 am

          Pretty obvious he confused Liberia with Libya…you can’t be that dense.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Milhouse in reply to healthguyfsu. | August 11, 2017 at 6:09 pm

            Anyone ignorant enough to do that shouldn’t be commenting on current affairs.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Scrollock in reply to healthguyfsu. | August 12, 2017 at 4:34 pm

            Yep, that’s what I did. From what I’ve read, Liberia is already screwed up, so maybe Obummer was already there. BTW, ignorant people comment on current events all the time. We vote, too.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Milhouse in reply to healthguyfsu. | August 13, 2017 at 12:41 am

            Which is why we have all the problems we do. Ignorant people shouldn’t vote, and every effort should be taken to discourage them from voting. Bring back literacy tests — honestly administered without distinction by race, sex, or anything else.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Scrollock in reply to healthguyfsu. | August 17, 2017 at 10:18 am

            Actually, I’m all for that. Also for only letting the people who have to pay for whatever is being voted on do the voting – no conflict of interest voters. These Special Tax Districts (they call them STDs for a reason) that get established, because there’s no one living in the area concerned to vote on it, are a crock. We had one locally that got voted down because, when they drew up the tax district, they accidentally included some college kids, and one of them showed up to vote no. I was proud of her.


     
     1 
     
     5
    jack burns | August 10, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    Sessions turned out to have more Senator in his bloodline than prosecutor. I didn’t want to believe it but I now believe that Jeff is just too timid for the job.


     
     0 
     
     5
    tom swift | August 10, 2017 at 3:24 pm

    That meeting preceded by just a few days the FBI clearing Hillary Clinton.

    Huh?

    Hillary said she was cleared.

    The FBI didn’t say she was cleared. Comey considered her safe from prosecution for her crimes, but he had to make up that “intent” thing to do it. That didn’t make the crimes go away.


     
     0 
     
     2
    herm2416 | August 10, 2017 at 5:50 pm

    How does one become the sole participant in a “meeting”? Isn’t that just talking to oneself?

    Sessions is an idiot.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend