Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Federal Judge Strikes Down Texas Voter ID Law Again

    Federal Judge Strikes Down Texas Voter ID Law Again

    “The court has found that the SB 5 process does not fully relieve minorities of the burden of discriminatory features of the law.”

    A federal judge has once again struck down the Texas voter ID law, stating that the changes the lawmakers made over the summer did not eliminate the discriminatory language. From The Hill:

    U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos ruled that the law was enacted with the deliberate intent to discriminate against black and Hispanic voters. Ramos said that it violates the Voting Rights Act and the 14th and 15th Amendments of the Constitution.

    The original 2011 law, Senate Bill 14, one of the most restrictive in the nation, requires registered voters to present one of seven forms of government-issued photo ID in order to cast a ballot.

    Lawmakers responded to previous judicial pushback against that bill by passing Senate Bill 5, a revamped version of the voter ID law this summer. The judge on Wednesday issued an injunction barring enforcement of that measure as well.

    That measure created options for voters who say they cannot “reasonably” obtain one of the seven forms of identification outlined by the state.

    I blogged about this subject in April when Judge Ramos struck down the law a second time:

    U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos made this same ruling in 2014, which forced an appeal. The Fifth Circuit issued a stay against the order. The Supreme Court stepped in and allowed Texas to use the voter ID law.

    But last July the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans asked the judge “to re-examine the decision” since the judges found that “some of the evidence used by the judge wasn’t relevant.” The two sides reached a deal for the 2016 election, which allowed a voter to “sign a declaration swearing that he or she has had a reasonable difficulty that prevented obtaining one of the accepted forms of photo identification.”

    Over the summer, the Texas legislation passed Senate Bill 5, which added U.S. passport books and cards as accepted forms of ID.

    Judge Ramos decided that the rewrite did not change the discriminatory language in the original bill. From The Hill:

    “The court has found that the SB 5 [Declaration of Reasonable Impediment] process does not fully relieve minorities of the burden of discriminatory features of the law,” she wrote.

    “Thus the court has the power to enjoin SB 5 as a continuing violation of the law as determined in this case,” she continued. “The court thus issues injunctive relief to prevent ongoing violations of federal law and the recurrence of illegal behavior.”

    She added:

    “This feature remains discriminatory because SB 5 perpetuates the selection of types of ID most likely to be possessed by Anglo voters and, disproportionately, not possessed by Hispanics and African-Americans,” she wrote.

    The judge’s decision also stated that the state of “Texas couldn’t be trusted to educate voters about changes to its ID law, following its widely criticized efforts ahead of elections in 2016 that were marked by confusion at the polls.” Ramos acknowledged that Texas promised to spend $4 million on voter education, but she noted that this promise is nowhere in “SB 5 or any other statute.”

    If no one touches Ramos’s decision, then no one will have to show an ID in future elections. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he will appeal:

    “The U.S. Department of Justice is satisfied that the amended voter ID law has no discriminatory purpose or effect,” he said in a statement. “Safeguarding the integrity of elections in Texas is essential to preserving our democracy. The 5th Circuit should reverse the entirety of the district court’s ruling.”


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    nordic_prince | August 24, 2017 at 12:16 pm

    Just another ruling by a “wise Latina.”

    Observer | August 24, 2017 at 1:45 pm

    Here is a list of the 7 acceptable forms of photo ID:

    (1) Texas driver license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)
    (2) Texas Election Identification Certificate issued by DPS
    (3) Texas personal identification card issued by DPS
    (4) Texas license to carry a handgun issued by DPS
    (5) United States military identification card containing the person’s photograph
    (6) United States citizenship certificate containing the person’s photograph
    (7) United States passport.

    So according to this judge, minorities can’t get Texas drivers’ licenses, minorities can’t get Texas handgun permits, minorities can’t get U.S. military ID’s, minorities can’t get U.S. passports, minorities can’t get U.S. citizenship papers, etc.

    This is utter bull$hit. The reason more white people have these forms of ID is simple — there are more white people than minorities living in Texas! That’s why non-whites are called “minorities” in the first place.

    Texas needs to appeal this idiotic decision immediately.

    The most serious impediment to getting a qualifying form of ID is that they are issued by government bureaucracies. I just went through getting a learner’s permit for my grandson, and it involved contradictory instructions for obtaining an appointment with the DMV, one 20 minute trip to the DMV (with an acute parking shortage) where we discovered we needed a notarized document, obtaining the notarized document, and another 20 minute trip to the DMV.

    And I pity the people who work at the DMV.

    PersonFromPorlock | August 25, 2017 at 7:02 am

    My suggestion for a while now has been that legislatures shouldn’t specify a voter-qualifying document, beyond its being one sufficient to identify the presenter as qualified to buy a firearm from a federally-licensed firearm dealer.

    Then let the Dems agonize between illegal voting and gun control.

    How dare the State of Texas attempt to protect the votes of its citizens. Don’t they understand the long tradition of ballot box stuffing? How can we possibly allow the vulgar citizens of this country to elect their own politicians honestly. Just look what happened in the last Presidential election.

    This judge has a fixed ideological bias and nothing that anyone does will change that. His decision is all about continuing to allow the stuffing of the ballot box, nothing more.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend