MSNBC Analyst: Kelly Might Have to ‘Tackle’ Trump To Prevent Him Nuking North Korea
“Is Kelly the guy who’s going to say ‘yes, sir,’ or he is the guy who’s going to say ‘don’t do it’?”
On Joy Reid’s MSNBC show today, analyst Malcolm Nance floated a scenario in which President Trump decided to use a nuclear weapon to stop the North Korean missile-testing program. Reid asked whether Kelly would be “the guy who’s going to say, ‘yes, sir, or the guy who’s going to say, ‘don’t do it?'”
“He may have to be the guy that tackles him.”
That won a “wow” from Reid.
MALCOLM NANCE: When decisions that are going to be — could be intensely controversial or even dangerous to the United States — I mean, this North Korean missile tests that they’ve been carrying out. If Donald Trump gets into his head that he’s going to burn that program out of the ground, with perhaps a nuclear weapon, well these generals are going to have to be the ones that are going to have to explain what the consequences of that. Because his consequence management skills are null.
JOY REID: Is Kelly the guy who’s going to say “yes, sir,” or he is the guy who’s going to say “don’t do it?”
NANCE: He may have to be the guy that tackles him.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Tom: “It’s static”
It’s all static – the attacks AND the counter-attacks.
So, if you would ask me to ignore the attacks, I would ask why you can’t simply ignore the counter-attacks.
Else, you are asking of me something that you won’t do.
You just keep blowin’ those snot bubbles, princess.
You are the MOST pathetic victim since Leslie Gore.
“That struts and frets his hour upon the stage. And then is heard no more. It is a tale. Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.”
So, you should be able to answer the questions I pose…like they’re nothing.
We’ll all wait.
And, just for the sake of context this fine morning, here’s where the attacks started, and not FROM me…
Fen really has his thong in a knot, and it won’t come out…
Please? Somebody fill in this new-comer:
This fella here, calling himself “Ragspierre” (Robespierre, newly resurrected?) methinks he not a true conservative as he gives himself to be, his ad-hominem rants have the mark of a typical liberal. Am I wrong?
100%, starting with “newcomer”. I’ve been here for years.
Ragspierre is the OPPOSITE of ROBESpierre. Get it now…???
I make many more arguments than ad hominem attacks (you don’t really understand the fallacy), but I will identify people who lie (which is not ever an “ad hominem” fallacy).
You, OTOH are new here. You should spend some time observing. I’m one of a very few actual conservatives here, and I’ve been consistently one for many years on this site.
I get called all kinds of things by people who cannot deal with what I say. Read, and you’ll find that to be true.
Leave a Comment