Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Maine Scraps Bill Outlawing Female Genital Mutilation

    Maine Scraps Bill Outlawing Female Genital Mutilation

    Prosecutors wanted to be able to “clarify and specifically identify” female genital mutilation as a crime

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1MZTu1pQZw

    Maine’s House rejected a bill that would criminalize female genital mutilation (FGM), the practice that cuts or removes the outside of the female genitalia.

    Instead, the House chose to change the bill and amend it to create “an education and outreach program” to stop the practice in the state’s growing immigrant communities.

    The Press Herald reported:

    After a lengthy and emotional debate, the House voted 76-71 against creating a new crime of “female genital mutilation” – on top of existing federal and state prohibitions – for a procedure estimated by the United Nations to have been performed on at least 200 million girls and women in 30 countries. Instead, House Democrats supported a version that directs the Maine Department of Health and Human Services to establish outreach and education programs featuring “culturally specific services for communities in the state wherein which female genital mutilation of minors might be practiced.”

    Rep. Rachel Talbot explained why she amended the bill:

    Rep. Rachel Talbot Ross, D-Portland, introduced the amendment to change the bill to require outreach and education programs aimed at communities in Maine where FGM “might be practiced.” Those programs would include support networks for victims of the practice as well as “culturally sensitive professional training.”

    “We all share the same goal, and our shared goal is we don’t want female genital mutilation to happen,” said Rep. Charlotte Warren, D-Hallowell, who noted Talbot Ross’s amendment had the support of national policy groups, victims advocates and the immigrant community.

    Those who opposed the original bill believe the laws in Maine are more than enough:

    The debate over the bill, L.D. 745, was not whether the practice happens worldwide but rather whether it is occurring in Maine, particularly inside the state’s growing communities of African immigrants.

    “I do not believe that it is happening in the state of Maine. I truly do not believe that,” said Rep. Lois Galgay Reckitt, D-South Portland. “And I believe if it was happening, it would be prosecuted vigorously by the federal (laws) or by the abuse statutes in this state.”

    However, Circa reported that the Maine Prosecutors Association supported this bill because it would allow the prosecutors “to clarify and specifically identify” female genital mutilation as a crime, “with a clear level of crime attributed to both the person doing the cutting as well as the parents who are accomplices.” That’s “because some prosecutors question whether it is ‘aggravated assault when the parents and the children consent.'”

    This newly worded bill will go to the Senate.

    Michigan’s Approach to FGM

    FGM became a hot topic in April after Michigan authorities charged two doctors..

    While Maine pushed aside FGM criminalization, Michigan strengthened penalties for those who perform FGM. From CNN:

    Performing FGM or transporting another person in the state for the purpose of undergoing FGM will be punishable by up to 15 years in prison, 10 years more than the federal penalty for the crime.

    In addition to increasing prison sentences for those involved in FGM, the series of 12 bills passed by the Michigan legislature would revoke the license of any health professional who assists in or commits the procedure.

    The laws state that saying the operation is “required as a matter of custom or ritual” will not be an acceptable defense for committing the crime. Parental consent is also not a legal defense, according to the new laws.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Tags:

    Comments



     
     1 
     
     3
    gonzotx | July 13, 2017 at 6:08 pm

    The argument of circumcision vs FGM is a sub.

    The males sexual pleasure and health is enhanced by one and the female experiences horrible health problems, severe pain for a lifetime, and zero sexual pleasure by the other.

    It’s horrible and disgusting and may the Maine pu$$ys rot in hell.


     
     0 
     
     1
    tom swift | July 13, 2017 at 6:23 pm

    … to establish outreach and education programs …

    Oh, good. The primary function of Liberal governance has been preserved; to expend money on yet another government program, while running no danger that the actual problem will addressed.

    It’s most reassuring to see that even out in Boonieville, the Dems in the legislature know their jobs.


     
     0 
     
     2
    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | July 13, 2017 at 8:38 pm

    What the Hell is wrong with Maine?


     
     0 
     
     0
    Canto28 | July 14, 2017 at 12:43 pm

    What excuse could there be for not outlawing FGM – a horrible abuse of young girls?


       
       0 
       
       0
      Milhouse in reply to Canto28. | July 14, 2017 at 1:32 pm

      Read the article before commenting. It’s already illegal, and it’s not a problem in Maine, so why make a law specifically banning it? This is pure virtue signaling, and people on this site are usually against that.

    I guess they’ll have to be circumcised in the back alleys with clothes hangers like in the old days. How many lives will be ruined by botched circumcisions? How many more lives will be ruined by unwanted orgasms? Stop the madness!


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend