Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Trump Will Keep Obama’s Dreamers Policy (UPDATE)

    Trump Will Keep Obama’s Dreamers Policy (UPDATE)

    The policy aimed at protecting undocumented immigrants who came here as small children

    President Donald Trump’s Department of Homeland Security did not touch former President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which allows undocumented immigrants, who came to the U.S. as small children, to remain in America. From The New York Times:

    The Department of Homeland Security announced late Thursday night that it would continue the Obama-era program intended to protect those immigrants from deportation and provide them work permits so they can find legal employment.

    A fact sheet posted on the department’s website says immigrants enrolled in the 2012 program, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, “will continue to be eligible” to renew every two years and notes that “no work permits will be terminated prior to their current expiration dates.”

    From the DHS fact sheet:

    Q. Does this mean that DACA recipients will not be able to apply for a three-year work authorization, as established in the DAPA memorandum?

    A. DACA recipients will continue to be eligible as outlined in the June 15, 2012 memorandum. DACA recipients who were issued three-year extensions before the district court’s injunction will not be affected, and will be eligible to seek a two-year extension upon their expiration. No work permits will be terminated prior to their current expiration dates.

    Immigration activists have welcomed this decision:

    “This is a big victory for Dreamers amid months of draconian and meanspirited immigration enforcement policy,” said David Leopold, an immigration lawyer. “The preservation of DACA is a tribute to the strength of the Dreamer movement and an acknowledgment — at least in part — by the Department of Homeland Security that it should not be targeting undocumented immigrants who have strong ties to their communities and have abided by the law.”

    On the campaign trail, Trump promised he would eliminate the Dreamer policy since Obama “defied federal law and the Constitution” with it.

    But once he took office, Trump has toned down his rhetoric. In April, DHS Secretary John Kelly told CNN that the department has not targeted ‘Dreamers’ because officials were more concerned with criminals:

    “The President told me to do two things,” Kelly said. “He told me to secure the Southwest border — all of our borders, and, of course, focusing now on the Southwest border — and to take the worst of those that are in our country illegally, take them — look for them and deport them. So that’s what I’m doing.”

    I blogged in February that DHS issued new guidelines for immigration, which listed which aliens should be deported by importance. The memos spared those under DACA:

    The changes would spare so-called “dreamers.” On a conference call with reporters, a DHS official stressed that the directives would not affect Obama-era protections for illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and others given a reprieve in 2014. But outside those exemptions, Kelly wrote that DHS “no longer will exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement.”

    *UPDATED* The New York Times has updated its piece to stress that officials have told its reporters that the statements on the fact sheet “were intended only to clarify that immigrants enrolled in the DACA program would not immediately be affected by a separate action officially ending a similar program for the parents of those immigrants.”


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Who could have / would have predicted that in the end Trump would have the same immigration policy as every other Republican candidate in the race last year…


      rdmdawg in reply to derf. | June 16, 2017 at 12:13 pm

      No other republican would even talk about it until Trump made it a campaign issue. I’m endlessly grateful for that alone, he changed the ‘national conversation’ as it were.

        derf in reply to rdmdawg. | June 16, 2017 at 1:59 pm

        So cool, he changed the conversation. And then changed nothing. And we complain about the do nothing Republicans in Congress. Nothing has changed with respect to the country’s immigration policy.

        I predicted this would happen. And were it not for the signature Trump issue (immigration), he would have never gained a foothold).

          Close The Fed in reply to derf. | June 16, 2017 at 5:03 pm

          Dear Derf:

          If that’s what you REALLY thought, then why the hell didn’t YOU run for office?

          No civic responsibility, if all you can do is carp, and not try to get your hands on the ball and run it down the field.


    Mac45 | June 16, 2017 at 1:00 pm

    The NYT story is nothing more than spin.

    The President cancelled the DAPA program because it was under an injunction which was still in place after a hearing before the SCOTUS. It was a dead program which had essentially exhausted its judicial options and was simply eliminated. Here is the text of the post on the DHS web site:

    “Release Date:
    June 15, 2017

    On June 15, Department of Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly, after consulting with the Attorney General, signed a memorandum rescinding the November 20, 2014 memorandum that created the program known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (“DAPA”) because there is no credible path forward to litigate the currently enjoined policy.

    The rescinded memo purported to provide a path for illegal aliens with a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident child to be considered for deferred action. To be considered for deferred action, an alien was required to satisfy six criteria:

    (1) as of November 20, 2014, be the parent of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident;

    (2) have continuously resided here since before January 1, 2010;

    (3) have been physically present here on November 20, 2014, and when applying for relief;

    (4) have no lawful immigration status on that date;

    (5) not fall within the Secretary’s enforcement priorities; and

    (6) “present no other factors that, in the exercise of discretion, make [ ] the grant of deferred action inappropriate.”

    Prior to implementation of DAPA, twenty-six states challenged the policies established in the DAPA memorandum in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The district court enjoined implementation of the DAPA memorandum, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision, and the Supreme Court allowed the district court’s injunction to remain in place.

    The rescinded policy also provided expanded work authorization for recipients under the DACA program for three years versus two years. This policy was also enjoined nationwide and has now been rescinded.

    The June 15, 2012 memorandum that created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program will remain in effect. ” –

    It does not signal ANY Trump administration policy change.

      Liz in reply to Mac45. | June 16, 2017 at 2:06 pm

      So, DAPA had 6 requirements that the person had to comply with before being given a “deferred action”.

      DACA has 7 requirements – one being in the country as of June 15, 2012. see the list in a comment above. So, the quantity of “dreamers” is not increasing.

      DHS knows how many people have a current DACA permit and they know the rate of application. Perhaps, this is a program that will quietly die out due to lack of activity.

        Close The Fed in reply to Liz. | June 16, 2017 at 5:05 pm

        Dear Liz:

        It would, except illegal aliens lie and DHS can’t prove their lies.

        Here since 2012? Okay, here’s your forged water bill.

        Under X age? Oh, great, you don’t LOOK 14….


          Liz in reply to Close The Fed. | June 16, 2017 at 7:46 pm

          If they have to go through that hassle of faking documents, then why are they applying for DAPA since there are other requirements and it has to be renewed.

          Perhaps the DACA program is for those who are really interested in being in the US.

          And, the DACA program does not give any type of legal status in the US.

    Close The Fed | June 16, 2017 at 5:08 pm

    I’m actually surprised no one has sued over this. It has the same problems constitutionally as DAPA.

    Emigration reform (e.g. refugee crises forced by Obama’s elective wars and regime changes). Catastrophic Anthropogenic…

    Also, the DREAM begins at conception. Obama’s semantic games give comfort to the Pro-Choicers and anti-nativists. Republicans should reject progressive, liberal euphemisms.

    snopercod | June 16, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    So is LI spreading fake news now? Trump Admin Rescinds DAPA Amnesty Program

    The Trump administration has fulfilled another one of Donald Trump’s campaign promises by rescinding the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program implemented under Barack Obama that could have allowed as many as five million illegal aliens with children who are citizens or lawful permanent residents to remain in the country if they met certain criteria.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Send this to a friend