Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    New York AG Sues Pro-Life Advocates Who Protest at Clinics in Queens

    New York AG Sues Pro-Life Advocates Who Protest at Clinics in Queens

    AG Schneiderman accused the protesters of harassing women and employees.

    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has filed a lawsuit against people who have protested outside of Choices Women’s Medical Clinic in Queens for the past five years.

    Schneiderman has accused the defendants of “targeting patients and employees every Saturday morning, telling them ‘You don’t know when you might get shot’ and even calling them murderers.”

    From The New York Daily News:

    The menacing protesters are not above using their bodies to block the passenger-side doors to impede patients arriving by car, or clashing with volunteer escorts trying to shield patients from unwanted abuse.

    “The tactics used to harass and menace Choices’ patients, families, volunteers, and staff are not only horrifying, they’re illegal,” Schneiderman said.

    “The law guarantees women the right to control their own bodies and access the reproductive health care they need, without obstruction. We’ll do what it takes to protect those rights for women across New York.”

    The lawsuit claims that the “protesters have violated the federal Freedom to Clinic Entrances Act and the New York State Clinic Access Act by chasing and crowding patients as they approach the building.”

    The Thomas More Society is representing the defendants and released this statement via email:

    “Members of the Church at the Rock peacefully counsel women who are considering having an abortion. They conduct themselves reasonably and compassionately, and offer information about abortion alternatives to those willing to listen. This is the exercise of their core First Amendment rights, and is an activity that takes place on the public sidewalk, the traditional venue for expression concerning important ideas and societal issues.

    “The New York Attorney General’s suit seeks to deny our clients their fundamental First Amendment rights and is without factual or legal basis. We will vigorously defend our clients’ right to continue to peacefully deliver a pro-life message to abortion-minded women on the public sidewalk, and will seek dismissal of the State of New York’s meritless attempt to deny our clients the rights guaranteed them by our Constitution. ”


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    cwillia1 | June 23, 2017 at 6:53 am

    Who is harassing whom? Is this an attempt to use the law to silence legitimate exercise of speech or is it an attempt to protect a legal activity from illegal interference? The devil is in the details but my sympathies and instincts are on the side of those who witness to the truth at personal expense and personal risk rather that those who profit from killing babies. I suspect that this is more of the kind of harassment that Daleiden and Merritt are enduring for nothing more than investigative journalism in the public interest.

      bhwms in reply to cwillia1. | June 23, 2017 at 9:38 am

      Isn’t this called SLAPP? (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) Several states have laws against this – I don’t know if NY is one of them.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend