New campus blood libel: Israel responsible for U.S. police shootings of blacks
UW-Madison student government blames Israel for U.S. police “extrajudicial killings of Black and Brown bodies”
In July 2016 I documented a growing tactic in the anti-Israel movement, to blame Israel for domestic U.S. police shootings of blacks, such as Michael Brown in Ferguson.
The tactic, meant to exploit preexisting racial tension and stoke anti-Semitism to turn people against Israel, had been many years in the making, as I wrote in Exposed: Years-long effort to blame Israel for U.S. police shootings of blacks:
… there has been a multi-year effort by left-wing and Islamist anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, and openly anti-Semitic activists to hijack racial tensions in the United States and redirect that anger towards Israel.
That effort has been on overdrive since the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson and is accomplished through a combination of false and misleading statements regarding the militarization of domestic U.S. police departments and U.S. police training in Israel.
The intellectual rubric is “intersectionality,” by which anti-Israel activists try to forge links with minority (particularly black) activists by holding out Israel as the key link to oppression around the globe….
It is preposterous to blame Israeli counter-terrorism training for the militarization of U.S. police, much less how a specific police officer acted in a particular situation. Only a miniscule and almost unmeasurable percentage of U.S. police are trained in Israel.
There are several hundred police training academies in the U.S. training tens of thousands of police in the U.S., compared to a few hundred (at most) police who participate in Israeli counter-terrorism training. That Israeli training is focused on counter-terrorism, and usually involves police chiefs who visit Israel for a week of combined seminars and tourism…
So the likelihood is somewhere close to zero that any cop who is involved in a shooting (much less an unjustified shooting) was trained in Israel and the Israeli training contributed to the shooting….
this movement to blame Israel for minority deaths in the U.S. is not about Israeli training of police. There is no connection. Whatsoever.
Rather, it’s an attempt to exploit racial tensions unrelated to Israel and to stoke hate particularly in the black community.
There is zero evidence that Israel anti-terrorism training of police chiefs has had any connection to any police shootings of blacks in the U.S., much less the high profile shootings that gave rise to the Black Lives Matters movement.
Nonetheless, anti-Israel activists like Australian writer CJ Werleman directly blamed Israel for the shooting of Alton Sterling:
This is just one example of how the claim has been spread through social media in the Sterling and other shootings.
The lack of factual basis for blaming Israel for U.S. police shootings also has not stopped anti-Israel groups who operate on campuses, like the misleadingly named “Jewish Voice for Peace,” from claiming Israel is responsible. Indeed, JVP issued a Passover Haggadah supplement for “ending U.S.-Israel police exchanges,” as Prof. Miriam Elman documented:
JVP’s new campaign, unveiled and discussed during sessions and workshops at their national conference in Chicago last weeked, is “Deadly Exchanges: Ending US-Israel Police Exchanges, Reclaiming Safety.”
It features prominently as a supplement to JVP’s Haggadah (titled “Leaving Mitzrayim,” or in English, Leaving Egypt).
This latest project plans to target the “exchange programs” between American police forces and Israel’s military and security experts.
According to JVP’s deputy director Stephanie Fox, the exchanges enable the IDF to share its “worst practices” like “torture, surveillance and spying which is all brought to bear against Palestinians.” Having completed the training sessions, back home U.S. law enforcement officials adopt these practices to use against American “people of color”.
The problem is that there’s not a shred of evidence for any of this.
The reality, as noted by Prof. Mark Levine (a harsh critic of Israel), is that the history of militarized policing in the U.S. is complex and multifaceted—and has nothing to do with Israel.
We are now seeing the fruit of this tactic on campuses.
In late April, the Associated Students of Madison (ASM), the University of Wisconsin – Madison student government, passed a wide-ranging divestment resolution which was not to include mention of Israel. In the type of deceptive move that we’ve seen at other campuses, at the last minute an anti-Israel component was added. The Algemeiner reported:
Anti-Israel activists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW) have been accused of having “cleverly manipulated” the Jewish community in order to successfully pass Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) legislation in an unanimous vote on Wednesday night.
Ariela Rivkin — the only Jewish voting member of Associated Students of Madison (ASM), the body that voted 22-0, with two abstentions, to adopt the pro-BDS resolution — told The Algemeiner on Thursday that BDS proponents “definitely orchestrated this to trick” pro-Israel students, by not broadcasting before the meeting that divesting from Israel was to be part of the agenda.
Instead, Rivkin said, the official agenda released 24 hours before the vote described the motion as, in general, about fossil fuels, prison labor, border walls and arms manufacturers….
[The] ASM meeting … took place during Passover, at which the BDS issue was unexpectedly raised again. The decision to discuss the matter at a time when many Jews were absent caused four student representatives to walk out of that meeting in disgust.
One anti-Israel provision caught my eye, because it wasn’t the usual divestment language. Rather, it specifically blamed police exchanges for the killing of blacks in the U.S.:
WHEREAS, Israeli police and military train US police departments and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in military police control tactics in response to civilian protests. These tactics have actively contributed to the militarization of police forces and the subsequent extrajudicial killings of Black and Brown bodies at the hands of these police forces,
This allegation is a lie, as described above. Additionally, almost all of the controversial police shootings have taken place in the context of an unexpected interaction between police and an individual, not as part of “crowd control.”
The pro-Israel group StandWithUs noted that the student government endorsed a baseless conspiracy theory:
There are exchange programs in which a small number of senior American police officials travel to Israel, but they go to learn about counter-terrorism, not community policing or crowd control. Unfortunately, instead of considering facts and logic, ASM chose to repeat a baseless conspiracy theory designed to demonize and dehumanize Israelis.
Yet this conspiracy theory became part of an official resolution of UW-Madison student government.
The University administration immediately condemned the resolution, without mentioning the false allegation of Israeli involvement in killing American blacks. The statement read in pertinent part:
The Associated Students of Madison’s Student Council is independent of the university administration. It does not control UW–Madison policies or practices and its actions tonight will not result in a change in our approach, or that of the WFAA, which is driven by its obligation to maximize the impact of a donor’s gift on the intended program in the university.
We are concerned that the actions taken tonight appear to violate a ruling of the Student Judiciary; Jewish members of student government, who raised this issue with the Student Judiciary, walked out of the meeting after expressing concerns that the process was undemocratic and not transparent.
Immediately after the Chancellor issued that statement the student government demanded she step down.
What happened at UW-Madison is just a modern form of the blood libel, blaming Jews for deaths to which they have no connection and seeking to impose collective guilt.
When groups like Jewish Voice for Peace tell you that the anti-Israel boycott movement is about the “occupation,” don’t believe them. There would be no reason to spread the blood libel that Israel is responsible for U.S. police shootings of blacks if the “occupation” were at issue.
Rather, what we are seeing on campuses is the exploitation of racial tension and stoking of anti-Semitism as a tactic to build anti-Israel coalitions.
[Featured Image: Cartoon by Mike Flugennock, cropped]
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
“They just go from perfidy to perfidy.”
The intellectual dishonesty at the the heart of Islam is brazenly apparent. I don’t know if any of you have tried to debate Muslims, but the pattern goes like this.
First they’ll say you’re taking Quran verses out of of context.
Again, I don’t don’t know how familiar you are with the Quran, but it provides no context.
For about 90% of the Muslims in the world, who call themselves Sunni (in English), that context is supplied in what is called the Sunnah of Muhammad.
So, fine, I go to the Sunnah (or different references if dealing with the Shia, but the categories of literature fall into the same genre). And then what happens.
Second, the Sunni deny the Sunnah.
They’ll start by denying the Sirah, or biographical literature, like Sirat al Rasul Allah. So now ibn Ishaq/ibn Hisham are out. Then they’ll start denying the validity of most of “six books” that comprise the canonical collections of ahadith.
If you’ve been following along, the people who claim to be in Arabic “Ahlus Sunnah wa’al Jemaah,” the adherents of the Sunnah and the Congregation…
…are now claiming to be no such thing.
Usually I whittle them down to claiming only Sahih al Bukhari is authoritative. Again, if you’ve been following along, the Sunnis have just denied or denounced over 90% percent of the Sunnah. Then they start denying individual hadith from Bukhari.
And now I’ve got them.
Bukhari didn’t supposedly write his ahadith collection until over 200 years after Muhammad supposedly died. Maybe 240 years. To put that in perspective we’d be just now be getting around to writing the history of the American Revolution.
Then I start agreeing that 100% of their historical narrative is complete and utter BS. Not just the over 90% they’ve already thrown under the bus.
Typical “discussion” with a typical muslim:
Typical Muslim” “Once you look closely, you can see that the Jews are responsible for all of the evils in the world! The Jews shot Michael Brown!!!”
Average Person: “How is it possible that a relatively small population of people who self-identify as Jews could be responsible for all of the evils of the world?”
Typical Muslim: “I can show you! They did it!”
Average Person: “What can you show me to prove it? you nave no actual evidence of any kind backing this up.”
Typical Muslim: “Well of course I don’t have any – the Jews destroyed it all! See, that’s how sneaky those Jews are – and this is what proves I’m right!!!”
The lack of evidence is proof of conspiracy! And your reluctance to accept such a common sense position proves that you are in on the conspiracy!
Yes, Arminius, and that’s the ones who actually know much about the Qur’an and the Sunnah. Many of them don’t, and since the writing is in classical Arabic, which many even Arabic-speaking Muslims cannot properly read, they need to rely entirely on what their imams say the Qur’an and Sunnah say.
The public should be reminded that the University of Wisconsin-Madison, has a reputation of being one of the best party schools in the country. Making the claim Israel is responsible for teaching American police to kill ‘black and brown bodies’ strongly suggests the school is working hard on regaining that First Place title.
Sounds like a good time to bring up the Jewish “conspiracy” regarding Nobel prizes in chemistry.
Well sure, when you’re blessed with the geographical advantage of being situated in the most barren stretch of land in the Middle East while surrounded by oil-rich enemies that outnumber you many times determined to kill every last one of you… It’s not fair!
And yet, 90+% of American Jews keep voting for the anti-Israel party. Kinda begs “the question” doesn’t it? If Jews don’t care, why should anyone else?
BTW, I still can’t get over the fact that PeeWee Herman’s father was a top gun pilot for the US Army in WWII and then for Israel in 1948.
He was instrumental in scattering Jordan’s vast army and keeping them pinned down in the desert. Otherwise, they would have overrun Israel in no time. An epic heroic figure. So how to explain why that acorn landed so far from the tree.
Things like that make it so hard for people who hate Jews to be specific about why. Hey, there’s GOT to be a conspiracy in there somewhere! Whatever your beef, it’s Da Joooos!!!! Conspiracy!
It’s hard to explain how anyone could have been a “top gun” pilot in the junk ME-109s the Israelis were forced to buy. That took enormous skill. And an enormous sense of humor.
Not to brag on myself, but I qualified as Marksman with a shackeldy old M1911 that nearly rattled itself apart before I completed the course of fire.
I wasn’t nearly as lucky with the hand-me-down M14.
I’m working on my Appleseed Rifleman badge myself (haven’t had much time the past year) where M14s are highly prized. Very accurate gun. I don’t really know what “good” is generally since people seem to have their own standards. But to me, it’s 3-4 MOA or less standing, kneeling, sitting and prone with a rifle. Bench doesn’t count. I seem to be a 4-5 MOA shooter. Plenty good enough for general infantry, hunting and varmints. Nothing to brag about.
I’m preety good at the range with handguns these days from 20 yards in but in real life, you gotta hit moving targets at close range. I don’t want to know.
One of the Delta Operators MOH recipients from the Black Hawk Down incident insisted on using an M-14. But it was not your average grunt’s piece…
Just as your average issue 1911 is a poor cousin of the 1911s being produced by some of the better outfits, or accurized by a good gunsmith.
“Not a shred of evidence”? But the left has REDEFINED “evidence”: now whatever they object to is “evidence of direct harm”.
Leave a Comment