Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Planned Parenthood Official Won’t Tell Tucker Feelings about Aborting Baby with Detectable Heartbeat

    Planned Parenthood Official Won’t Tell Tucker Feelings about Aborting Baby with Detectable Heartbeat

    She couldn’t admit the obvious—that a fetus with a heartbeat is a separate human life—because to do so would admit the inhumanity of abortion

    It was the most infuriating, heartbreaking, conversation on abortion this Insurrectionist has seen. On his Monday night Fox News show, Tucker Carlson asked Planned Parenthood Executive VP Dawn Laguens six ways to Sunday how she feels about aborting fetuses after five-and-a-half weeks, at which point the baby’s heartbeat can be heard.

    But no matter how he framed it, Laguens refused to answer, hiding behind a series of canned responses about a women’s right to choose, etc. At one point, Tucker said, “I’m asking you a human question, and hope you’ll favor me with a human answer.”


    But of course, Laguens wouldn’t. Because she couldn’t. If she had answered honestly—that of course, an unborn child with a detectable heartbeat is a separate human life—she would effectively admit the inhumanity of abortion.

    But if she had denied it, claiming such a baby wasn’t a distinct life, she would have painted herself, and Planned Parenthood, as venal deniers of reality. As a frustrated Carlson concluded at the segment’s end: “that was a uniquely shallow conversation, Dawn.”

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     1
    Unknown3rdParty | March 14, 2017 at 12:28 pm

    A uniquely shallow conversation because they are uniquely shallow, unable to admit to facts and logic. Where have I heard that before?

    A human life in her fetal stage of development. A human life in her teen years. A human life in her senior years. A human life from conception.

    If any of the One Percenters who run the disgusting abortion mill Planned Parenthood admitted the truth about the fetus, they would no longer be allowed to enjoy that cushy lifestyle and the constant adoration of them by the Left.


     
     0 
     
     2
    Arminius | March 14, 2017 at 2:39 pm

    I’m not surprised. A spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood in Florida argued against a “born alive” bill that would require doctors to seek medical care for any baby that survived an abortion.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301374/In-Florida-Legislature-Planned-Parenthood-lobbyist-defends-doctor-assisted-infanticide-babies-born-alive-botched-abortions.html

    “The shocking moment a Florida Planned Parenthood lobbyist defended doctor-assisted INFANTICIDE when babies are born alive after botched abortions

    -Planned Parenthood rep: Decision about whether to save a baby born alive ‘should be between the patient and the health care provider’

    – Lawmaker: ‘I think that at that point, the patient would be the child struggling on a table. Wouldn’t you agree?’

    – Bill text: ‘An infant born alive during or immediately after attempted abortion is entitled to the same rights, powers, and privileges as any other child'”

    If you belong to an organization that is willing to deny the humanity of a child outside of a woman’s womb*, why wouldn’t you deny it while it’s still inside the womb.

    *Planned Parenthood later walked this back after they caught a well deserved ration of s***, but it’s important to note that their reflexive instinct is to defend the indefensible.


     
     0 
     
     2
    Arminius | March 14, 2017 at 2:58 pm

    I’m an abortion absolutist. I don’t even believe in abortion in cases of rape or incest. Because the child is a genetically distinct human being, and is not the perpetrator of any crime.

    Now, in the case of rape there are forms of “emergency contraception” that even Catholic hospitals will offer a woman to prevent her from getting pregnant, provided it doesn’t have an abortifacient effect.

    I’m all for a woman doing whatever she wants with her own body. But one of the things that should have struck everyone when The Center for Medical Progress released their undercover videos was, those weren’t the woman’s body parts in those trays. Those hearts, lungs, eyeballs, brains, etc. belonged to someone other than the woman.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend