Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03
    Announcement
     
    Announcement
     

    TRUMP NOMINATES NEIL GORSUCH for Supreme Court Scalia Seat

    TRUMP NOMINATES NEIL GORSUCH for Supreme Court Scalia Seat

    Conservative judicial superstar

    http://ijr.com/2017/01/790658-we-asked-a-high-ranking-administration-official-who-trumps-scotus-pick-is-and-they-sent-this/

    UPDATE: It’s Neil Gorsuch

    I’ll admit it, I did some trolling tonight

    https://twitter.com/byrdinator/status/826608690346283008

    Earlier:

    Who will it be?

    Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman are considered the two most likely nominees to fill the Scalia Seat.

    The gossip (i.e. media reports based on conversations with unnamed “sources”) claim it’s Gorsuch. Regardless of the choice — or if Trump pulls a surprise — Democrats have promised a fight to the death. They need to put on a show for the base. So it looks like this is going to go nuclear option.

    Trump has played this masterfully, with the networks breaking into their nightly schedules for the announcement. He will have a yuge audience.

    Featured Image source: IJR

    http://ijr.com/2017/01/790658-we-asked-a-high-ranking-administration-official-who-trumps-scotus-pick-is-and-they-sent-this/

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     1 
     
     0
    Bitterlyclinging | February 1, 2017 at 9:27 am

    Clerked for Byron “Whizzer” White a JFK nominee and Justice Anthony Kennedy, neither of whom are conservatives.
    A sheep in wolf’s clothing.


       
       0 
       
       2
      Ragspierre in reply to Bitterlyclinging. | February 1, 2017 at 10:08 am

      Clerking for ANY Supreme is a signal honor, and almost an essential for a candidate for any appellant court.

      Clerks both learn from and have the opportunity to influence the jurists for whom they work.

      This does not have any clear implications for Gorsuch’s own philosophy. For that, you need to look to his own record and the opinions of his colleagues.

      I see nothing to impeach Gorsuch’s record. I dearly hope that he IS a real Scalia quality nominee.

      Mike Lee likes him very much, and this is a good sign.


         
         1 
         
         3
        MarkSmith in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 12:46 pm

        Remind me, how many of Trumps cabinet picks does Mike Lee support? Gee maybe he was wrong about Trump after all.


           
           4 
           
           1
          Ragspierre in reply to MarkSmith. | February 1, 2017 at 1:30 pm

          I don’t know, T-rump sucker. Do you have links?

          I doubt very much he really supports the RINO Price (Bohner Boi), the very model of the modern insider Mnnuchkin, or the other Deemocrat voters and the Soros employee. Or, hell, Mrs. McConnell.

          I know I don’t, and that’s all that matters to me, troll.


             
             0 
             
             0
            MarkSmith in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 3:01 pm

            Oh no, I am have called a troll by the Jacobin Liar. Boo Hoo, cry me a river.

            Sorry, but your Mike Lee is a #NeverTrumper. It is apparent that he did get the memo that Trump won and is falling in line.

            Sundance said it all

            Your arrogant self-righteous efforts not only didn’t help, but they actually opposed our common sense objective. You were as much a benefit to Hillary Clinton and Mitch McConnell as Media Matters and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, perhaps even more. Lest you need a reminder

            https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/01/sorry-nevertrumpers-but-you-dont-get-to-dismount-your-high-horse-today/

            I bet you have a pretty pink pussy hat.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 3:56 pm

            OK, you admit you don’t have any links, AND you are a T-rump sucking cultist who slups up the shit from NOT-Conservative Tree Sloughs.

            I’ve known this for some time, troll. Just a blood and soil(ed) boi and clock-sucker.


             
             0 
             
             0
            VaGentleman in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 4:07 pm

            rags,
            how old are you?


             
             0 
             
             0
            Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 4:36 pm

            WAY old enough to know a lying VaPigman when you make yourself obvious, lying POS.

            Are YOU attacking me for having the temarity to post what I did about Gorsuch, like your butt=boi here?

            Or just on general ThoughtPolice goonishness…???


             
             0 
             
             0
            VaGentleman in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 5:06 pm

            You’ve got anything at all to worry about from the THOUGHTPolice. Nothing at all.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 5:13 pm

            You didn’t answer the question, VaPigman. I show a LOT more thought than do you, sucker.


             
             0 
             
             0
            MarkSmith in reply to Ragspierre. | February 1, 2017 at 8:51 pm

            Jacobin Liar Rags, you need to get out of your bedroom before your mom starts yelling at you to get to work. She would be very upset with the language you use.

            Back on topic, Gorsuch is an excellent pick that will continue to make heads explode. Tomorrow, more explosions coming with Mexican Drug dealers the target.


             
             0 
             
             0
            VaGentleman in reply to Ragspierre. | February 2, 2017 at 1:19 am

            rags, since you asked, but I fear it is wasted effort on my part. If you don’t know why people here find you offensive, you haven’t been paying attention. But you know why, don’t you? It’s not an accident. You go out of your way to be offensive. You don’t just state your case. You add foul language, a gratuitous insult, and anything else you can in your attempt to get attention.

            Your post here ( Ragspierre | February 1, 2017 at 3:56 pm ) is absolutely despicable. The foul insults you used added nothing to your argument. They were just there to belittle your opponent – to tear him down in a feeble attempt to make yourself look good. You have no respect for the rest of us on LI and no self respect either. And that’s why people here find you offensive – you earn it every day, with almost every post.

            State our case. Defend it passionately. Do it politely. If the only way you can make yourself look big is by making the other guy look small, you weren’t shit to start with.


             
             0 
             
             0
            MarkSmith in reply to Ragspierre. | February 2, 2017 at 12:21 pm

            Well said VAGentleman. I did a quick search on

            “Ragspierre says lying sack of shit” and I got something like 191 hits. Below is one going back to 2013. I remember seeing something in a response back in 2009. I doubt he will get the clue even with a post with over 30+ thumb downs.

            My apologies to all the other folks here that I egged him on.

            Sadly, we could have a good discussion about say Steven Mnuchin sainthood with Westbank or Soros. It is too bad because I believe he probably has some good information to share, but just can’t get control of his emotions.

            Ragspierre says:
            November 5, 2013 at 5:47 pm

            Yeah, because you can’t read, you lying sack of shit.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend