Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Sarah Palin on Carrier deal: corporate welfare the “hallmark of corruption”

    Sarah Palin on Carrier deal: corporate welfare the “hallmark of corruption”

    “We know special interest crony capitalism is one big fail”

    President-elect Trump’s deal with Carrier to keep a thousand jobs in America is drawing fire from an unexpected source.  Former Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin is slamming the deal as an example of crony capitalism.

    Writing at Young Conservatives, Palin explains that the government picking winners and losers is always a bad idea, even when “our guy,” the good guy does it.  She begins, though, with heartfelt good wishes for the Carrier employees who will be keeping their jobs and having a far better Christmas than they expected.

    Palin writes:

    When government steps in arbitrarily with individual subsidies, favoring one business over others, it sets inconsistent, unfair, illogical precedent. Meanwhile, the invisible hand that best orchestrates a free people’s free enterprise system gets amputated. Then, special interests creep in and manipulate markets. Republicans oppose this, remember? Instead, we support competition on a level playing field, remember? Because we know special interest crony capitalism is one big fail.

    Politicians picking and choosing recipients of corporate welfare is railed against by fiscal conservatives, for it’s a hallmark of corruption. And socialism. The Obama Administration dealt in it in spades. Recall Solyndra, Stimulus boondoggles, and all their other taxpayer-subsidized anchors on our economy. A $20 trillion debt-ridden country can’t afford this sinfully stupid practice, so vigilantly guard against its continuance, or we’re doomed.

    Reaganites learned it is POLICY change that changes economic trajectory. Reagan’s successes were built on establishing a fiscal framework that invigorated our entire economy, revitalized growth and investment while decreasing spending, tax rates, over-reaching regulations, unemployment, and favoritism via individual subsidies. We need Reaganites in the new Administration.

    However well meaning, burdensome federal government imposition is never the solution. Never. Not in our homes, not in our schools, not in churches, not in businesses.

    She’s not wrong.

    An early Trump supporter, Palin expresses her hope that the Trump team understands that this type of intervention is unacceptable and that the terms of the deal aren’t as concerning as she fears.

    She continues:

    Gotta’ have faith the Trump team knows all this. And I’ll be the first to acknowledge concerns over a deal cut by leveraging taxpayer interests to make a manufacturer stay put are unfounded – once terms are made public.

    But know that fundamentally, political intrusion using a stick or carrot to bribe or force one individual business to do what politicians insist, versus establishing policy incentivizing our ENTIRE ethical economic engine to roar back to life, isn’t the answer. Cajole only chosen ones on Main St or Wall St and watch lines stretch from Washington to Alaska full of businesses threatening to bail unless taxpayers pony up. The lines strangle competition and really, really, dispiritingly screw with workers’ lives. It’s beyond unacceptable, so let’s anticipate equal incentivizes and positive reform all across the field – to make the economy great again.

    Watch the report:


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    inspectorudy | December 4, 2016 at 11:52 am

    None of us knows what has transpired between Trump and UT so anything we say is pure speculation. However, Palin making statements as if she knows is signalling the end of her fame as a winner or endorser of winners. She is doing what every major newspaper and TV network are doing, in a very negative way, and projecting as to what Trump is going to do. This would be a great time for all of them and us to discuss things that we know for fact and things that we wish for in the future. But to argue about the unknown is a waste of time.

    She sounds like the old Sarah.

    Palin has bought into the Left’s narrative that everything we own and everything we earn belongs to the State unless the State decides not to confiscate it. Only by that logic can reducing taxes–taking less of what we own and what we earn–be considered “welfare”. It’s doubly wrong here because corporate earnings are taxed twice–once when the corporation earns them, and again when they pay them out as dividends. There are no taxpayer dollars being given away here, there are taxpayer dollars not being confiscated.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend