Clinton campaign emails: State Dept “considering placing a story” at AP re “emails Sid turned over that HRC didn’t”
Planned to “work with State and the AP to deploy” Hillary’s spin before the House Committee “has a chance to realize what they have”
You may recall that the State Department produced certain Sidney Blumenthal emails with Hillary Clinton that were not included in the emails Hillary turned over to the State Department.
The story of more Blumenthal emails beyond what Hillary turned over called into question Hillary’s repeated claim that everything work-related was turned over to the State Department, and only purely personal emails (like regarding Yoga) were deleted.
In searching the Wikileaks database of the Podesta email hack, Mary found the email exchange below which shows that the Clinton campaign received a heads up that the State Department was to produce the emails to a House committee, and team Clinton scrambled to prepare a response in advance of the State Department turning over the emails to Congress.
There are several aspects of this email that are important, including that the State Department was considering planting a story with a friendly reporter at AP and that the Clinton campaign and the State Department were working together to create messaging for Hillary:
Here’s the full text (emphasis added):
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015-06-24 16:32
Subject: Re: Proposed response to upcoming State Dept disclosure on Sid emails
Just spoke to State a little more about this. A few updates.
1. The plan at the moment is for them to do this tomorrow, first thing in the morning.
2. What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they hav along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn’t, which will make clear to them that she didn’t have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn’t turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn’t, as Brian noted.
3. They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it. On that last piece, we think it would make sense to work with State and the AP to deploy the below. So assuming everyone is in agreement we’ll proceed. It would be good to frame this a little, and frankly to have it break tomorrow when we’ll likely be close to or in the midst of a SCOTUS decision taking over the news hyenas.
Will keep everyone posted if anything changes, including the timing.
That email was in response to an email from Brian Fallon, campaign manager planning a response:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Brian Fallon <[email protected]> wrote:
All – In preparation for the possibility that the State Department may
> acknowledge as soon as today that there were 16 Sid emails missing from the
> 55k pages of material produced by HRC, I wanted to circulate the below
> draft plan for responding to the inquiries that Nick will get. Thanks.
> *Q: The State Department says that at least 16 of the emails > that Sid Blumenthal turned over to the Benghazi Select Committee were not > included in the 55,000 pages of materials produced by Hillary Clinton.
> Doesn’t this prove that Hillary Clinton deleted certain emails at some > point before producing them to the Department?* > > *ON-THE-RECORD RESPONSE FROM SPOKESMAN NICK MERRILL:*
> “Hillary Clinton has turned over 55,000 pages of materials to the State > Department, including all emails in her possession from Mr. Blumenthal.” > > *ADDITIONAL POINTS ON BACKGROUND FROM CLINTON AIDE:*
> Not only did Clinton turn over all emails that she has from Blumenthal, > she actually turned over more than a dozen emails that were not included in > what Mr. Blumenthal handed over to the House committee.
> We do not have a record of other correspondence between Mrs. Clinton and
> Mr. Blumenthal beyond that which was turned over to the State Department.
> In terms of the documents provided by Mr. Blumenthal to the House
> committee, we do not recognize many of those materials and cannot speak to
> their origin.
> *OFF RECORD, if pressed on whether we are essentially admitting the
> possibility that she deleted some emails:*
> Look, we do not know what these materials are, or where they came from.
> Just take a look at them: many of the documents are not even formatted as
> For all we know, it could be that, in the course of reproducing his emails
>after his account was hacked, Sid misremembered which memos he actually
>forwarded to her and which he did not.
> And hey, even if Sid is right and some of these documents were at some
> point sent to Clinton, this is unremarkable anyway for two key reasons:
>One, she would have been under no obligation to preserve them since
> Blumenthal wasn’t a government employee.
> Two, there is nothing in any of these emails that is remotely new or
> interesting. Indeed, none of these 16 emails are qualtitatively different
> than the dozens of others that Hillary already produced to the State
> Department. So it is completely ridiculous to suggest that there might have
> been any nefarious basis for her to want to delete any of Sid’s
The big story of the Wikileaks Podesta hack is demonstrating how deeply in bed the mainstream media is with the Clinton campaign, no longer acting as watchdog but as participant in Clinton messaging.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
How can anybody trust a candidate who gives private speeches to donors, telling them that she has different pubic and private positions?
Who takes a good deed by an opponent that turned a huge embarrassment into a win-win-win solution for a woman, and turns in into an accusation of sexism?
Who treats both the Department of State and a Foundation as a personal piggy bank, and then lies about it?
Links to all these stories have been posted here, already. There are many other stories that also have come out. This woman’s actions are not those of a person who is trustworthy.
BUT Trump said something mean 11 years ago!!!!
Trump says mean things every day. His mouth is his worst problem. He’s a loudmouthed, braying, orange jackass.
The good news is that because the media and the Dems are so tightly bound, when one goes down so shall the other. May that day come soon.
You raise a good point. I do wonder… if the media starts to fall first, do you think the Democrats will intervene and attempt to prop them up? Something like an Obamacare for networks?
Making the printed press a “public sector” thing has been suggested before now.
Hillary will win the presidency and NOTHING will come of this, just like Benghazi and so many other Clinton failures and corruptions. Comey was the man.
She will then proceed to muster the full power of the government to steamroll any complainers flatter than Wile E. Coyote when he hit the mesa wall on his rocket skates.
Just more of the same corrupt behavior! WHO is going to stop this crap?
Leave a Comment