Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    WATCH LIVE: Presidential Debate Coverage With Legal Insurrection

    WATCH LIVE: Presidential Debate Coverage With Legal Insurrection

    Round 1: Fight!

    Welcome to our live coverage of the first Hillary v. Trump showdown.

    If you’re just joining us, see Professor Jacobson’s pre-debate prognostication here.

    The debate, hosted by Hofstra University, begins at 9:00 EST.

    Live stream:

    Political media reaction:


    LI Author feed:

    In short:

    giphy

    Follow Kemberlee on Twitter @kemberleekaye

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    Can anyone tell me what this means in policy terms? Because to me it sounds like an import tax (aka tariff). And once other countries retaliate with their own tariffs, that’s a trade war.

    Trump: “And what you do is you say, fine, you want to go to Mexico or some other country, good luck. We wish you a lot of luck. But if you think you’re going to make your air conditioners or your cars or your cookies or whatever you make and bring them into our country without a tax, you’re wrong.”

    I don’t know the don’t know the fedback yet, but at least he did something the last two candidates didn’t do.

    He fought back.


       
       1 
       
       1
      RodFC in reply to RodFC. | September 26, 2016 at 11:02 pm

      Let me elaborate. Before baser minds start to take things out of context.

      I am extremely happy that Donald fought back, unlike our last two candidates.

      I think he did excellent, but I’ve been watching his debates for a year now. My perspective is skewed. The only way I would say he didn’t win is if he shot Hillary. Well if he did that then I would say we all won. So even then.

      I want to hear feedback not from MSM but from the undecided voters out there.


         
         0 
         
         1
        Valerie in reply to RodFC. | September 26, 2016 at 11:16 pm

        At a wild guess, I would say that nobody’s mind was changed.

        Both sides will declare (tepidly) victory, because each candidate stood up well enough.

        However, Hillary did not seal the deal with thinking Democratic voters. And, The Donald very effectively showed that he had a point, or five.

        Tomorrow, we will see at least 4 major stories from the MSM, including the Washington Post and the New York Times, telling us all about Donald Trump’s “lies,” followed two days later by columnists from other sources saying, “Ya know, he does have a point, after all.”

        Meanwhile, the sources for the fact-checking on Hillary will be spiked.

        And, the voters that have sense enough to get online, will see it all.


           
           2 
           
           3
          JackRussellTerrierist in reply to Valerie. | September 27, 2016 at 2:25 am

          I’m still far from convinced, but Trump may have made a slight inroad with Never-Trumpers such as myself. This is THE first time I’ve ever sensed any sincerity in the man and any real passion for anything or anybody beyond himself and his loved ones.


     
     2 
     
     2
    filiusdextris | September 26, 2016 at 10:51 pm

    The issues favor Donald (duh), but I think Hillary did better tonight. Donald rambled, didn’t respect the moderator, gave clichés and canned answers, sounded like a boor at times, was frequently off-topic, and was very repetitive.

    Trump actually said that he thought NATO was fighting terrorism because he talked about it in a media interview a few months ago. Hillary had to tell him what NATO article 5 was and that it was invoked by the USA after 9/11 and that was the reason we are in Afghanistan.

    How can Trump not know that? And if you don’t know something, try not to volunteer that you don’t know it by coming up with clownish statements. Do you know how many opinions I have on the novel Finnegan’s Wake? Zero, because I never read it and don’t know anything about it. But if I were Trump I’d be arguing with English professors about it all the time.

    And Trump’s “pay for protection” foreign policy is repulsive. Why not just have our servicemen loot banks and shops and museums when they’re deployed? It’s quicker and will probably come up to about the same amount of money as taking Iraq’s oil or strip mining Afghanistan or sending Japan and Korea a bill to be paid in Nissan cars and Samsung phones or whatever.

    An hour-and-a-half of missed opportunities for Trump. If he had prepared, he could have easily turned the tables on Hillary and Holt. Instead, he floundered around and let her edge him out. He has three chances for the American public to see him unfiltered and he squandered the first one.

    Things he could’ve corrected:
    –there is no wage gap between genders,
    –Bill Clinton embraced supply side economics in his second term,
    –everything she said about his tax returns could be said about her emails,
    –when she said we all have implicit bias (i.e. we’re all racists) he should’ve asked her to clarify that and specifically ask if that included herself, the Dem party at large, the BLM thugs, Robert Byrd, her running mate, Obama, Chelsea, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton, or if that only included white Republicans.

    There were plenty more, but I really hoped he was going to leave her withering on the canvas.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend