Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    “Deep Values” Profile of core Legal Insurrection readers

    “Deep Values” Profile of core Legal Insurrection readers

    2012-2013 research project using same methodology as in recent Black Lives Matter report.

    Yesterday I published details on Anne Sorock’s Research Report: #BlackLivesMatter more about radical social upheaval than “Black Lives”.

    I mentioned in the post how Anne uses the Deep Values methodology she learned while interacting with the Food & Brand Lab at Cornell University while getting her MBA. Deep values research seeks to understand not just what consumers like or want, but what deeply held values lead to such decisions.

    At the Frontier Lab, Anne has applied deep values methodology to numerous political topics, including  why people decide to become politically activeOccupy movement participants’ motivations, and why Republicans won’t call themselves Republican, among others.

    I also mentioned that Anne had applied that methodology several years ago to understanding why Legal Insurrection readers read Legal Insurrection, and that I might share those findings with you.

    Well, I’m in a particularly good mood, so here are some of Anne’s findings.

    The research took place starting at the very end of 2012 into 2013. I selected 12 readers who were consistent commenters or had communicated with me directly. There was no attempt to obtain a cross-section of all people who read Legal Insurrection, or to profile people based on demographics, income and other marketing factors. If you want that, check out our public Quantcast stats.

    Rather, these were people who were “fans” of Legal Insurrection, and we wanted to understand the deep values behind the decision to keep coming back to Legal Insurrection among the thousands of political websites. As Anne described it, the Objectives were:

    • Prototype core LI reader
    • Uncover key motivating values

    Here are some of the slides Anne provided to me reflecting the finding of the hour-long reader interviews. Most of the slide are self-explanatory, but I’ve added my own commentary as part of this post.

    The first slide is a summary of the findings, referred to as a “brand champion” prototype. So if you are too lazy to read on, this slide serves as a cheat sheet to what follows. Is this you?

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Brand Champion Prototype

    Most important to me in the Pattern of Use was that we provide readers with intellectual ammunition. Although it’s not on the slide, one of the readers interviewed mentioned that he (or was it she?) felt s/he obtained information that could be used against liberal relatives at holiday dinners. Holiday Dinner Insurrection.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Pattern of Use

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Getting Into The Battle

    You may need to click on this Map of Hierarchical Values to read the fine print. The top line valued were Hope – Connection – Empowerment – Self-Worth.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Hierarchichal Value Map

    We occupied a niche focused on quality.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - LI Niche

    It will come as no surprise which other websites readers were visiting.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Other News Sources

    Over the years I have become friends with several Legal Insurrection readers, in a real world sense. I’ve also developed the acquaintance of many more. It’s one of the most satisfying aspects of this website. Particularly when people buy me coffee.

    Equally important, even if we’ve not communicated directly, I do feel there is something special about Legal Insurrection that creates a personal connection.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Personal Connection to Prof

    This personal connection leads readers to take pride in our success. Whenever I’m mentioned on radio, I immediately get emails from readers telling me I was just mentioned.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Intertwined Brand Alignment

    Okay, party over. The comments section. I still think we’re more of a community than most places, but based on my review of the comment section and reading my inbox the past year, things have deteriorated. I have no answers at this point. My goal for 2017 is to “Make the Comment Section Great Again!”

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Community

    Since this project was conducted shortly after the 2012 elections, it’s no surprise Liz Warren was on peoples’ minds. Our research on Warren broke new ground in many ways, and is the type of thing I’d like to do more of, if only I had 34 hours in a day.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Warren Case Study

    Here are maps of interviews of several of the readers, with the quoted language a quote from the interview. Click on the image to enlarge.

    Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Reader 1 Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Reader 2 Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Reader 3 Legal Insurrection Research - Slide - Reader 4

    None of these findings surprised me.

    In some respects, 2012-2013 were years in which the mission of Legal Insurrection was being fulfilled. It’s a melancholy reflection for me, because I’m not sure that’s still the case. There are many reasons for that, but that’s a discussion for another time.

    Instead, I’ll just take this opportunity to thank the readers. Dexter thanks you too.

    Dexter reading Legal Insurrection

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     4
    buckeyeminuteman | August 14, 2016 at 3:06 pm

    People like secondwind and other rude, crass, egotistical people who call themselves conservatives in the sense that Trump also does are the reason the comments section has gone downhill in the past year. In their minds, since Trump acts like an all-knowing ass they can too. The apples don’t fall far from the tree.


       
       3 
       
       1
      Barry in reply to buckeyeminuteman. | August 14, 2016 at 8:01 pm

      I love how you neverTrumpers can overlook the “rude, crass, egotistical people” that are opposed to trump.

      You need glasses.


         
         0 
         
         2
        Old0311 in reply to Barry. | August 14, 2016 at 9:11 pm

        Not a #neverTrump, but I have glasses, hearing aids, and several other things that keeps an old grunt moving. Most of all I have my meds. Do you want some? LOL!! j/k

        I did a bunch of years of readjustment counseling with a very liberal Baptist preacher (there is just the one as far as I know) and in all those years, the thing that helped the most was when I learned to lower my expectation level. People aren’t perfect, life is not perfect. And yes, I have coffee and pie with him every Tuesday morning.


           
           0 
           
           0
          Barry in reply to Old0311. | August 14, 2016 at 10:26 pm

          “Do you want some? LOL!! j/k ”

          Nope Old, not required. I’ve been fortunate so far. Not even glasses and no meds as I approach the golden age of 64. My vision is still 20/20, but really close stuff ain’t what it used to be. When I make my yearly visit to the doctor for a required physical (racing) they always seem surprised when I say no, no medications. But then, they are surprised when my Dad, 90 this fall, says the same thing. Lucky I guess. 🙂


         
         0 
         
         2
        buckeyeminuteman in reply to Barry. | August 15, 2016 at 12:02 pm

        Barry, I am not neverTrump, I am neverHillary. I am going to vote for whomever on the ballot has the best chance of beating her. With 3 months to go, any party or candidate could gain traction or totally flounder. Regardless of whether I would vote for him, he and the Trumpublicans who oozed out of the mud over the past year are pompous, crass and rude and have nothing in common with the party of Lincoln and Reagan. Voting for him against Hillary does not mean you have to stoop to his level…


           
           1 
           
           0
          Barry in reply to buckeyeminuteman. | August 15, 2016 at 2:36 pm

          Alright Buckeye. It’s easy to be confused when you only call out “rude, crass, egotistical people” that are for trump and not the same on the nevertrump side.

          There are only two candidates with a chance of winning. No third party can win. Any vote not made for trump IS a help to hillary, regardless of how the nevertrump crowd tries to spin it. Glad to see you have common sense.


     
     0 
     
     0
    DouglasJBender | August 14, 2016 at 11:32 pm

    I often stop by just for the semi-random classic-rock music videos.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend