Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Please DO NOT SHARE this “Bernie is My Comrade” graphic

    Please DO NOT SHARE this “Bernie is My Comrade” graphic

    Nasty lawyer letter claims trademark infringement. Can you say Streisandski Effect?,d.cWw&psig=AFQjCNGWfymlU5ZVX23DJsM9J9b7G9hx8A&ust=1461016008237887

    If you want to know why Democrat leaders and party officials are scared to deathski about Bernie Sanders at the top of the ticket in November, take a look at the Featured Image, the graphic on a T-Shirt sold by Liberty Maniacs.

    Bernie is doing well in head-to-head polling against Republicans because Republicans, including yours truly, have laid low in going after Bernie. Hillary, meanwhile, is too afraid of the progressive base of the Democrat Party to lower the hammer-and-sickle on Bernie’s head through negative advertising.

    Buzzfeed reports that Team Bernie is not happy with the T-Shirt and related merchandise:

    An online merchant has accused the Bernie Sanders campaign of “trademark bullying” after a Bernie 2016, Inc. attorney sent him a cease and desist letter regarding T-shirts, mugs, and sweatshirts depicting the candidate with historic communist leaders.

    Claire Hawkins, a lawyer with Garvey, Schubert, Barer — which said it is “the official organization” of the campaign — sent the letter to Daniel McCall, demanding his company, Liberty Maniacs, stop selling the items.

    The products show Sanders next Karl Marx, Joseph Stalin, and others with the tagline, “Bernie is my comrade.”

    “I was surprised Bernie’s campaign would have done that,” McCall, who designed the image, told BuzzFeed News….

    Trademark infringement? Okay, I don’t claim to be an “expert” in the field, but wouldn’t that mean Bernie is claiming proprietary rights in his image being next to Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Engels and Marx?

    Buzzfeed continues:

    Paul Levy, McCall’s lawyer, responded to Hawkins, accusing the Sanders campaign of “trademark bullying.”

    In his letter, Levy wrote to Hawkins: “It is your contention, apparently, that an ordinary and reasonably prudent consumer would tend to be confused about whether it is the Sanders campaign that is promoting Sanders’ candidacy by associated him with the 19th Century theoreticians of the communist movement as well as with three ruthless Communist Party dictators.”

    Levy called the contention “absurd,” adding that the Sanders campaign “cannot use trademark theories to silence members of the American public who disagree with your client’s views and oppose his candidacy.”

    Levy wrote about the letters in a blog post for Public Citizen, an advocacy group founded by Ralph Nader. He wrote in the blog that that lead counsel for the Sanders campaign told him that Garvey, Schubert, Barer sent the demand letter without any consultation with the Sanders campaign.

    So Team Bernie is denying involvement, but the lawyer who sent the threatening letter specifically said he was counsel to Team Bernie and acting on behalf of Team Bernie, as these excerpts show:


    Wait, hold on.

    So the lawyers also claimed that Bernie in the image might create confusion? As in people might mistake him for Marxist leaders who killed hundreds of millions of people collectively? (pun intended)

    The Team Bernie lawyer letter really worked, just like it worked for Barbra Streisandski:

    The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet.

    It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose 2003 attempt to suppress photographs of her residence in Malibu, California, inadvertently drew further public attention to it. Similar attempts have been made, for example, in cease-and-desist letters to suppress numbers, files, and websites. Instead of being suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity and media extensions such as videos and spoof songs, often being widely mirrored across the Internet or distributed on file-sharing networks.

    I hope Bernie wins the Democrat nomination.

    Oh boy, do I hope. It might be our only chance.

    Bernie For Glorious Leader from Aleister on Vimeo.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Wait a second.

    From a “Trademark” standpoint, I can completely see what they’re getting at here. It’s not the IMAGE that’s the problem.

    It’s the Lettering with the two “swooshes” underneath.

    Now, that being said AMF, Inc v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341 (C.A.9) 1979, is entirely applicable, and the only three of the eight factors that Sen. Sanders would be able to point to would be:

    – Similarity of the mark (it’s identical);

    – Evidence of Actual Confusion (Bernie is a Socialist, several of those individuals were “Communists” and I’m not sure Bernie’s supporters are smart enough to know the difference); and

    – Defendant’s intent in selecting the mark (Defendant specifically chose the design of Sen. Sanders campaign exactly BECAUSE it makes for biting political commentary).

    Make the lettering Block or Times New Roman or something else and the whole (already weak) argument goes away entirely.

    Bonus points if instead of a star, they put a hammer and sickle over the “i.”

    Paul In Sweden | April 20, 2016 at 12:13 am

    The real problem is that too many are willfully blind or have not lived long enough or do not have family that have been chased or persecuted by communists. Mathematics, Science and HISTORY seem to me to be ancillary activities in both our schools and in our societies. This is unfortunate but a seemingly inevitable pattern which is fostered by complacency. History keeps on repeating.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend