Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    What Was RNC Thinking in Selecting CNBC to host Debate?

    What Was RNC Thinking in Selecting CNBC to host Debate?

    What did they expect to happen?

    If you watched the CNBC Republican primary debate last night and the political analysis that followed on FOX News or any other center right outlet, you know what a disaster the event was.

    The moderators were so far left and openly combative that it was like watching a Republican debate moderated by the Democratic Party. CNBC’s moderators succeeded in making CNN’s Candy Crowley look fair and balanced.

    Everyone who’s familiar with John Harwood and CNBC had some idea it was going to go this way. Everyone except Republican Party chairman, Reince Priebus. Following the debate, Priebus reacted harshly.

    Ben Kamisar of The Hill:

    RNC chief: ‘CNBC should be ashamed’

    Republicans are lashing out at CNBC over Wednesday’s night’s GOP debate, with the party’s campaign chairman saying the network “should be ashamed” of how it was handled.

    In a biting statement issued after the event concluded, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said that while he was “proud of our candidates and the way they handled tonight’s debate, the performance by the CNBC moderators was extremely disappointing and did a disservice to their network, our candidates, and voters.”

    “Our diverse field of talented and exceptionally qualified candidates did their best to share ideas for how to reinvigorate the economy and put Americans back to work despite deeply unfortunate questioning.”

    “CNBC should be ashamed of how this debate was handled.”

    You know who else should be ashamed? Reince Priebus.

    What did he think was going to happen? Did he think John Harwood and CNBC were going to be fair to Republicans? Agreeing to the network, venue and moderators were stupid mistakes.

    Here’s a video of Priebus making his statement after the debate:

    Will we ever see a Republican debate moderated by people who aren’t openly hostile to Republicans? Why is there no debate moderated by Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and Thomas Sowell?

    Reactions on Twitter were swift and harsh:

    Featured image via YouTube.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    forksdad | October 29, 2015 at 11:16 pm

    GOPe are happy with their cucklove media. They want to move to the left. They want globalism and a president that cares as much or more about illegal aliens and Mexicans as Americans.

    Why stage them the way they do? Because they can.

    Pee Wee Prebus is not merely incompetent, but as scummy a backstabbing louse and sellout as former Squeaker Boehner.

    Prebus is part of a GOP hit parade of sewage. Let’s keep passionately trying to rain on it.

    Meantime, the Trump vote-machine marches on. Thanks Pee Wee!

    Skookum | October 30, 2015 at 3:23 am

    Ever since Candy Cowley ran interference for Barry in the 2012 debate the ‘Ican Party should have vowed to never again let Leftists news personalities anywhere near a debate. Choose an unbiased professor of rhetoric to moderate, and let the candidates set the agenda ala Lincoln – Douglas. If you have to have news personalities involved (a bad idea), use conservative personalities, not vetted progressives. At least balance the panel.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend