Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    George Will: Purge Trump and His Supporters from GOP

    George Will: Purge Trump and His Supporters from GOP

    “Trumpites” are only “lightly attached to the political process”

    George Will has written a thought-provoking piece over at WaPo in which he argues that the GOP should purge itself of Trump and Trump’s supporters.

    Will explains:

    When, however, Trump decided that his next acquisition would be not another casino but the Republican presidential nomination, he tactically and quickly underwent many conversions of convenience (concerning abortion, health care, funding Democrats, etc.). His makeover demonstrates that he is a counterfeit Republican and no conservative.

    He is an affront to anyone devoted to the project William F. Buckley began six decades ago with the founding in 1955 of the National Review — making conservatism intellectually respectable and politically palatable. Buckley’s legacy is being betrayed by invertebrate conservatives now saying that although Trump “goes too far,” he has “tapped into something,” and therefore . . . .

    Therefore what? This stance — if a semi-grovel can be dignified as a stance — is a recipe for deserved disaster. Remember, Henry Wallace and Strom Thurmond “tapped into” things.

    George Will Washington Post headshot

    Unlike Ted Cruz who embraces Trump supporters, Will wonders who Trump’s supporters are:

    Conservatives who flinch from forthrightly marginalizing Trump mistakenly fear alienating a substantial Republican cohort. But the assumption that today’s Trumpites are Republicans is unsubstantiated and implausible. Many are no doubt lightly attached to the political process, preferring entertainment to affiliation. They relish their candidate’s vituperation and share his aversion to facts. From what GOP faction might Trumpites come? The establishment? Social conservatives? Unlikely.

    They certainly are not tea partyers, those earnest, issue-oriented, book-club organizing activists who are passionate about policy. Trump’s aversion to reality was displayed during the Cleveland debate when Chris Wallace asked him for “evidence” to support his claim that Mexico’s government is sending rapists and drug dealers to the United States. Trump, as usual, offered apoplexy as an argument.

    Will concludes his piece calling for “excommunicating” Trump and his supporters from the GOP:

    So, conservatives today should deal with Trump with the firmness Buckley dealt with the John Birch Society in 1962. The society was an extension of a loony businessman who said Dwight Eisenhower was “a dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy.” In a 5,000-word National Review “excoriation” (Buckley’s word), he excommunicated the society from the conservative movement.

    Peter Whener, writing at Commentary, agrees with Will:

    Fortunately there are conservative commentators who are doing just that [“excommunicating” Trump and his supporters], including Bill Bennett, David Brooks, Mona Charen, Charles C.W. Cooke, Michael Gerson, Jonah Goldberg, Victor Davis Hanson, Charles Krauthammer, Matt Lewis, Rich Lowry, Michael Medved, Paul Mirengoff, Dana Perino, John Podhoretz, Karl Rove, Jennifer Rubin, Kevin Williamson, regular contributors to this web site (among them Max Boot, Noah Rothman and Jonathan Tobin), editorial page writers for the Wall Street Journal and others.

    These individuals, while differing on various matters, understand the difference between angry populism and conservatism. They don’t believe crudity is a conservative virtue. And they don’t want conservatism stained by an unprincipled interloper and cynical opportunist, which is what Mr. Trump is. (It’s been well documented that until a few years ago, Trump was a registered Democrat, a large financial contributor to leading liberal politicians, and held liberal positions on a wide range of issues.)

    In that sense, this is a clarifying moment for conservatism. Those on the right who have become Trump defenders have, I think, made a serious error in judgment that is the result of a rather profound misunderstanding of conservatism (for more, see here). You can cherish and champion conservative principles, or you can support and praise Donald Trump. But you can’t do both.

    Writing at Townhall, Pat Buchanan offers a different viewpoint:

    For there is a plot afoot in The Washington Post Conservative Club to purge Trump from the Republican Party before the primaries begin.

    “A political party has a right to … secure its borders,” asserts the Post’s George Will, “a duty to exclude interlopers.” Will wants The Donald “excommunicated” and locked out of all GOP debates until he kneels and takes a loyalty oath to the nominee.

    “Marginalizing Trump” carries no risk of “alienating a substantial Republican cohort,” Will assures us, for these “Trumpites” are neither Republicans nor conservatives. Better off without such trash.

    The Post’s Michael Gerson says “establishment Republicans” must “make clear that [Trump] has moved beyond the boundaries of serious and civil discourse.” He loathes the Trumpites as much as Will.

    Trump’s followers are “xenophobic,” Gerson tells CNN. They have a “resentment of outsiders, of Mexico, of China, and immigrants. That’s more like a European right-wing party, a UKIP or a National Front in France. Republicans can’t incorporate that.”

    But if the GOP has no room for Trump’s followers, it has no future. For there simply aren’t that many chamber-of-commerce and country-club Republicans.

    I’m sure that this is a debate that will continue for some time, but I wonder if it will end as the GOP establishment seems to think it will?


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Peppermint | August 17, 2015 at 8:52 am

    So many Trump opponents are making broad claims about who the Trump supporters are. How do they know? The truth is that they have no idea. And the Trump phenomenon is too new for anyone to have had a chance to clearly profile his support.

    persecutor | August 17, 2015 at 8:55 am

    If a political party has a right to “secure its borders”, then by extension, it has a right to secure those borders from those who flinch at doing it the geopolitical level–north and south.
    I’m not a Trump supporter, but apparently am part of the “riff-raff” that shocks Wills’ sensibilities and who should also be purged under his line of thought. No problem George, I’m just registered in the GOP to be able to vote in the primary.

    cbenoistd | August 17, 2015 at 9:39 am

    Of the 20 individuals named by Peter Wehner as the vanguard of resistance to Trump, how many protested the tactics used by the administration and its press operatives to drive Sarah Palin from public life by any means necessary, including legal/financial intimidation? I suspect Victor David Hanson would have done so. Matt Lewis made a big show of taking his support back. The record of the other dauphins is to depressing to list. The GOP solved its Sarah Palin Problem™ without my input, and it is welcome to deal with Trump without any resistance from me, or help.

    Mysticbeetle | August 17, 2015 at 11:18 am

    First bifurcation, now dauphins.

    This riff raff will totally edumacated enough to converse with George Will just by reading the Legal Insurrection comments.

    (should he in his profundity and superiority in thought and manner condescend to float down to my level, i’m sure.)

    Of the political junkies I know who are R’s or right I’s, the BULK support Trump, with Cruz a close second. These people are intelligent, well-informed and successful in life.

    What I do think alarms Will even more is that R’s/D’s/I’s who aren’t political junkies are supporting Trump as well… which supports the idea that if Trump gets the nod, he wins and likely wins big.

    There are people registering to vote or planning on voting for the first time so they can back Trump. That’s YUGE!

      Ragspierre in reply to SKinDC. | August 17, 2015 at 5:24 pm

      Yah. You’re right. It IS a lot like Obama voters in 2007.


        Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | August 17, 2015 at 10:49 pm

        ” It IS a lot like Obama voters in 2007


        You just kill me. Comparing the two is like comparing night and day. Trump has energized the “fed up with DC vote”, not the opposite.

        It really doesn’t matter what you think of Trump. Comparing his supporters to Obama supporters is just


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend