Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03
    Announcement
     
    Announcement
     

    Phi Kappa Psi to “pursue legal action” against Rolling Stone

    Phi Kappa Psi to “pursue legal action” against Rolling Stone

    Send in the lawyers

    When Rolling Stone inflicted its UVA “gang rape” fantasy on the American people, it didn’t just damage its own reputation; it took down members of the targeted fraternity and university communities down with it.

    As I reported on yesterday, there will be no consequences for the RS staff members who contributed to the now-redacted article. No one has resigned in disgrace, or been given 15 minutes to clear out their office. It’s business as usual at Rolling Stone—at least for now.

    Spokesmen representing Phi Kappa Psi fraternity have made a statement indicating that the organization will “pursue all available legal action” against Rolling Stone.

    From CNN Money:

    “After 130 days of living under a cloud of suspicion as a result of reckless reporting by Rolling Stone magazine, today the Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi announced plans to pursue all available legal action against the magazine,” the fraternity said in a statement.


    In a statement on Monday, Stephen Scipione, the president of the Phi Kappa Psi chapter, said “this type of reporting serves as a sad example of a serious decline of journalistic standards.”

    “A lot of people threaten defamation and don’t follow through with a lawsuit,” HLN legal analyst Joey Jackson said on CNN on Monday afternoon. “In this case, it’s hard to argue that there were not tangible, recognizable reputational injuries. This story went viral. Everyone was talking about it.”

    That’s all we know at this point; we don’t have a timeline, or a specific list of action items, or named plaintiffs and defendants. All we know is that a lawsuit is looming on the horizon.

    Anyone else salivating? I know I am.

    That being said, this course of action will be more complicated than it appears to be. According to law professor Eugene Volokh, the Columbia report could provide evidence of negligence on the part of RS and its staff members, but that’s where the easy part ends.

    UVA isn’t going to be the one to sue, because government agencies can’t sue for libel. That leaves the fraternity and its members, and individual university employees. We could see lawsuits brought by those individually alleged in the RS article to be rapists, the UVA Phi Psis as a group, Phi Kappa Psi fraternity as an organization, or the university officials and/or students named in the article.

    I’m already tired. And excited.

    I’m not a chum-in-the-water kind of attorney. I don’t normally get excited over the prospect of a juicy lawsuit—but the day has come. As I said above, this story didn’t just harm the image of Rolling Stone and its employees. It damaged the reputations and seriously disrupted the lives of innocent people, because its author was in pursuit of a blistering take on a particular narrative about campus sexual assault.

    This lawsuit, unlike the hell its subjects inflicted, is well-earned, and I can’t wait to see what form it takes.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     1 
     
     1
    Estragon | April 7, 2015 at 1:36 am

    I expect their case will be quickly settled with no admission of wrongdoing by RS, but for enough for the frat to remodel the house.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Elliott | April 7, 2015 at 6:20 am

    If they were smart that is what they would do but they aren’t and won’t. And they are going to have to apologize as that is as important as the settlement in an international libel. One of the things Jackie is going to have to do is co-operate in establishing that she is a psychiatric patient to avoid culpability. Otherwise the fact that she catfished and outsmarted a Rolling Stones star reporter and editorial staff will be the centerpiece of a trial. Both of her “friends” who spilled the beans to the WaPo were on Kelly last night and had difficulty not bursting out laughing. Jackie is a well known and obvious fabricator of malarkey that even then freshmen boys figured out and avoided.


     
     0 
     
     0
    rorschach256 | April 7, 2015 at 12:45 pm

    I understand that there have been whispered threats that PKP is opening itself up to being eviscerated in the press because the Frat has had other run-ins with the law in the past. While the lawsuit is specifically about RS’s blatant disregard to facts or truth or professional ethics, the court of public opinion is another matter entirely. They may win, but ultimately lose in the end.

      Maybe. But the other side of that is that any one of those press-individuals who writes may be opening themselves or their organizations up to a libel claim by PKP if the press acts negligently in researching those claims. The question will be whether or not PKP and the individuals involved have become “public figures” in the mold of “NYT v Sullivan” and “Gerts v. Robert Welch, Inc.” to add the actual malice standard, or if mere negligence will suffice.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend