Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Brazilian spying hypocrisy

    Brazilian spying hypocrisy

    I think the Brazilian President is not so much upset that we spy, but that we spy better than her spies spy.

    I have warned repeatedly that the NSA disclosures by Edward Snowden via Glenn Greenwald and others serve a dual purpose.

    Part is to expose genuine breaches of privacy about which we should be concerned; part is to disrupt U.S. foreign intelligence activities and relations with other countries.  The former provides excellent cover for the latter.

    The leaks and disclosures are all one sided — as if other countries don’t spy on the U.S. and their own citizens. It would be nice to see “whistleblowers” defecting from the Chinese and Russian intelligence agencies spilling their secrets to newspapers, but they know better for the safety of themselves and their families.

    The latest outrage is exhibited by the Brazilian President, Dilma Rousseff, who canceled a state dinner in her honor in Washington, D.C., because of revelations by Glenn Greenwald that the NSA spies on her, Brazil, and the Brazilian state oil company.

    The hyprocrisy is dripping. The Brazilian intelligence agencies are quite expansive and have a long history (post-junta) of spying abuses:

    • Spy Agency In Brazil Is Accused Of Abuses (2000): “The director of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency, Col. Ariel Rocha de Cunto, has been dismissed. News reports last month that his agents were spying on an opposition governor, reporters, a prosecutor and even the president’s son were quickly followed by charges that at least two of his senior aides supervised the torture of dissidents during the military dictatorship that ruled the country from 1964 to 1985.In a sworn deposition to federal prosecutors last week after he stepped down, Colonel de Cunto identified some of the many entities that his agency has had under surveillance. Among those were the environmental group Greenpeace, the human rights organization Americas Watch, the Monsanto chemical company and the religious sect led by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon.”
    • Brazil’s spy chiefs suspended in bugging scandal (2008): “The chiefs of Brazil’s spy agency have been suspended and a probe launched into allegations the agency eavesdropped on telephone conversations by senior judicial, legislative and government officials.”

    There also is a new program to spy on internet users — my guess is that they are not going to relying on simple social media aggregators, they don’t need a new espionage program to do that:

    • Brazil Intelligence Agency Monitors Social Networks To Thwart Unrest (2013): “The Brazilian Intelligence Agency (ABIN) began to monitor social networking sites on 700 subjects, defined by the agency, in order to keep the government informed about demonstrations and organized movements in the country. Abin is not the first intelligence agency in the world to create a system of monitoring Internet networks. According to information from Brazilian media, the initiative came after the security agencies of the country failed to alert President Dilma Rousseff about the protests that resulted in violent scenes around Brazil, including the invasion of Congress.”
    • Brazilian government launches operation to monitor the web (2013): “As anti-government protests continue in Brazil – even after the bus fare reductions announced in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro this week – the Brazilian government has rushed to put together an operation to monitor information about upcoming demos across the social networks.The Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin) has allocated resource to analyze information posted on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and WhatsApp about upcoming protests on a daily basis….According to the newspaper, the temperature and scale of the protests will be measured through a system called Mosaic, which can follow up to 700 themes and can also find out info such as possible involvement of political parties in the demos, as well as supposed financing from those interested in creating havoc.How exactly this data is being monitored is the question. It seems impossible to me that the government would be able to go through data generated by applications such as WhatsApp without crossing the boundaries of the law. Since information from tools such as Whatsapp don’t direct send messages across carrier’s SMS networks, it is more difficult to know what is being said.”

    I know, I know, two wrongs don’t make a right.  But when we know the extent of Brazilian spying, perhaps we can put the outrage of the Brazilian President in context.

    I think the Brazilian President is not so much upset that we spy, but that we spy better than her spies spy.

    Another result of the Snowden-inspired outrage? Brazil joins Iran and other countries trying to find a way around a globally integrated internet, which if it develops will have a profoundly negative impact on freedom around the world.

    Update:  Reader, commenter and former U.S. diplomat The Diplomad previously wrote on his blog:

    As I noted about the French, the Brazilians, especially, should keep quiet about espionage. They have an active intel organization which collects on foreigners and Brazilians in touch with foreigners. Whenever I was in Brazil, we always assumed our phones were tapped and, on occasion, we were being followed.

    Well, if that’s true, then the Brazilian intelligence agencies probably have an extensive file on Greenwald and his Brazilian partner, who has been involved as a courier of the stolen NSA information.

    Related Post: Beware Glenn Greenwald bearing leaks


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    PersonFromPorlock | September 18, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    “I have warned repeatedly that the NSA disclosures by Edward Snowden via Glenn Greenwald and others serve a dual purpose.”

    A dual effect, yes: but “dual purpose” speaks to Snowden and Greenwald’s motivation, which I doubt Professor Jacobsen has any special knowledge of.

      platypus in reply to PersonFromPorlock. | September 18, 2013 at 11:58 pm

      Uh, Prof. J is a LAW professor. Ergo, he thinks legally, which means he deduces from evidence. He DEDUCED a purpose that conforms with the known facts.

      You, on the other hand, are one of those guys who likes to criticize others. Why? For the same reason a dog licks itself – because it can.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend