Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Politically correct epistemic closure counterattacks Boston Marathon bombing reality

    Politically correct epistemic closure counterattacks Boston Marathon bombing reality

    In other words, it’s not them, it’s us.

    Beginning Monday there had been a non-stop attempt to pin the blame for the Boston Marathon bombing on the “right wing” and Tea Party. 

    It wasn’t so much an argument based on facts as a hope based on politics, most clearly by David Sirota at Salon.com, but he was far from alone, Add Boston Marathon Bombing to pile of Failed Eliminationist Narratives.

    Reality smashed those hopes in the face.

    As it became indisputable that the perpetrators were Chechen Muslims who expressed support for Jihad and al-Qaeda (although the full extent of their connections is not known), the narrative shifted.

    Now the emerging narrative is that these killers were not part of a vast foreign conspiracy but isolated “lone wolves” who became disenchanted with American society, who were not fully integrated into society, who were unhappy with their lives here and thus became radicalized.

    It’s a straw man framing of the issue, because the choice is not between a highly integrated international conspiracy and some solo brother team who didn’t know nothin’ about nobody.

    PBS Brothers Lone Wolves or Conspiracy

    Maybe it’s somewhere in between. Framing the issue this way shifts the focus to American society, how the brothers’ became alienated by us, by our actions, how we need to look in the mirror not at jihadism:

    LA Times Brothers in Boston Attack Stood Apart

    If only we had been nicer, none of this would have happened.

    In other words, it’s not them, it’s us. They were radicalized here, by us. Even if they don’t come right out and say it, that’s the implication.


    We’re also seeing a full-blown attempt to excuse away the Jihad angle to the story. This was foreseeable:

    Twitter - @TikunOlam - Boston Marathon1

    And it’s being revealed in story after story:


    The motives, so mysterious and unknown?

    Politico - Bombing Motive Far From Clear

    To his credit, Adam Serwer, now at Mother Jones, reported reality:

    The politicians are on board:

    AP - Deval Patrick Bombers Motives Uknown

    We can never know, can we, when there is epistemic closure.

    If posting Jihadi videos on YouTube is not enough of a clue, what will be enough?

    Update — Not surprisingly Think Progress puts the “Islamophobia” label on Peter King and Republicans even though Diane Feinstein didn’t use that term and King did not express hatred of Muslims:

    Expect more of this.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    Correction above: Boehner’s ‘defending’ NPR should have read ‘defunding.’ (Quite a typo…)


     
     0 
     
     0
    Bruno Lesky | April 21, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    Maybe too late in the comments for LI denizens… I am energized by The Fine Report’s attack. Also, I usually support gs’s concepts re: coalitions.

    Would it work to create a multi-phalanxed approach? A meta collation … of … us?

    […] Legal Insurrection: Politically correct epistemic closure counterattacks Boston Marathon bombing reality: […]


     
     0 
     
     0
    GrumpyOne | April 22, 2013 at 1:31 am

    The prof remarked, “If only we had been nicer, none of this would have happened,” when coining the radical left as to causation in Monday’s bombing in Boston.

    That outlook is chillingly close to what Ron Paul in one of the presidential debates last year, a view that most rational conservatives do not subscribe to.

    Being “nice” to a crazy person will never get you anywhere except for maybe a bloody nose…

    […] and Tea Party by reference to the indisputably “White” Timothy McVeigh, and to evade the questions the left does not want to face as to Jihadism, whether “homegrown” or […]


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend