Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    October 15, 2008: “Will 401(k)’s Disappear in the Interest of Fairness?”

    October 15, 2008: “Will 401(k)’s Disappear in the Interest of Fairness?”

    Were you reading Legal Insurrection on the 3rd day of its existence?

    If so, you would have known that Democrats were targeting your 401(k) and other retirement accounts, Will 401(k)’s Disappear in the Interest of “Fairness”?:

    Powerful House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation’s $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.

    House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, are looking at redirecting those tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute.

    So is it any surprise that a first step towards eliminating private retirement accounts will be part of Obama’s proposed budget? Via Breitbart (h/t reader):

    The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts.

    According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals “to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”

    “The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per year in retirement, or about $3 million in 2013,” the statement said. “This proposal would raise $9 billion over 10 years.”

    Targeting retirement accounts was a long time in coming, but it always was in the administration’s back pocket in case needed.

    Alternative title:  All I really need to know about the Obama presidency I learned at Legal Insurrection in October 2008.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Voyager | April 6, 2013 at 3:04 pm

    Well, he did tell us he would have more flexibility after the election.

    401Ks, IRAs and HSAs are smart individual savings accounts that Americans can use to prepare for the future. These investment vehicles should never ever be touched by the government. If a bill is ever brought before Congress to limit or confiscate my money I would take my money and run.

    I never asked the government for Social Security or Medicare. I wish I had all of that money taken out of my paychecks. I would have invested it for my retirement. Instead the government is using my cash to finance Democrat’s elections.

    radiofreeca | April 6, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    In the interest of Fairness and Solidarity with the Workers of America: since the average American does not have a pension, I propose that all government workers immediately have their pensions cancelled, and the money in pension plans go to pay down the common debt!

    I don’t think any Progressive could really argue with taking money from the rich (government employees) and give to the poor (non-government workers).

    Tparty | April 6, 2013 at 7:23 pm

    I wonder if the administration be as forceful in limiting the net present value of public worker retirement pensions (funded by other taxpayers of course), already over $500,000/year in some cases, with the same passion as it has in going after private wealth. Or maybe because the purchasing of votes with other people’s money might be impaired, Obama will just let this slide?

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend