Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Cyprus loco Euro-problem gone wild

    Cyprus loco Euro-problem gone wild

    I was reviewing World War I history with my son yesterday.

    The global-scale conflict started with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, on June 28, 1914.  This event set in motion a series of diplomatic incidents that led inexorably to the outbreak of war in Europe within a few weeks.

    Then I began contemplating the possible repercussions of the Cyprus bank bailout, and asked my San Diego compatriot and economics expert W.C. Varones for his opinion on its impact on the world economy.  He says:

    The new deal in Cyprus is fairer to insured depositors, but just having floated the idea of deposit confiscation will do permanent damage to faith in the financial system.  Cyprus will be a wreck when the banks open and Societe Generale, a major French bank, is already calling for a depression there.  And anyone with money over the insured limit in Spain, Greece, Portugal, or Italy would be crazy not to pull it out now.  Heck, I’d be nervous about money even under the insured limit.

    To underscore his thoughts, Varones offers a piece from the Economist with the following quote from Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the Dutch finance minister and head of the “Eurogroup” of euro-zone finance ministers:

    A rescue programme agreed for Cyprus on Monday represents a new template for resolving euro zone banking problems and other countries may have to restructure their banking sectors…

    This new template will surely have rich Spaniards, wealthy Italians, and other EU citizens considering their options, in terms of moving money in excess of deposit guarantee limits elsewhere.

    The reminded me of a scene from a “South Park” episode that seems most apt.

    In fact, Tyler Durden of Zero hedge notes that Cyprus serves as a reminder that a bank deposit is not risk-free (hat-tip Ed Driscoll).

    1. A deposit in a bank is not a riskless form of saving.We may not see eye to eye with the FT’s Martin Wolf on many aspects of modern economics and central banking in particular, but he described banks well last week:
    2. Banks are not vaults. They are thinly capitalised asset managers that make a promise– to return depositors’ money on demand and at par– that cannot always be kept without the assistance of a solvent state.”
    3. When states become insolvent, the piper must ultimately be paid. Fatal, embarrassing insolvency is not a problem that can be perpetually or painlessly deferred.

    Cyprus matters..because the inept handling of its crisis last week threw one facet of modern banking into sharp relief: if a deposit guarantee is seen to be fraudulent or sufficiently fragile to be easily smashed by politicians, then confidence in banks, and in unbacked paper currency itself, will be vulnerable to an unpredictable run.

    Frankly, a run on Cypriot banks seems inevitable, which is why they are now closed until Thursday  — giving the regular people time to embrace the levy and understand all the awesome goodness in the new bailout plan.

    What is the impact here? As Professor Jacobson noted, the American stock markets fell in response.  And I would like to note that Varones was one of the first to opine that our government’s manipulation of interest rates has led to something resembling confiscation in this country already.

    Finally, the Russians cannot be pleased that the accounts of their citizens were trimmed more severely by this solution.  The following statement from Dimitry Afanasiev, chairman of a law firm in Moscow, brings to mind another famous global war:

    “These people thought their savings were safe in the EU and now they are caught in the pincers of the German blitzkrieg, with Cyprus unable and Russia unwilling to protect them,” he said.

    I suspect, like the1914 assassination in Sarajevo, its going to take the world a few weeks to process the consequences of the Cyprus plans.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    2nd Ammendment Mother | March 26, 2013 at 10:02 am

    Considering that the US Treasury has already held hearings on the confiscation of Americans retirement accounts (August 26, 2010), I have trouble understanding why there is so much “meh” on the subject. Even the conservative media feels that FDIC Insurance would make depositors whole, without realizing that it is also a Federal program. The same signature that confiscates the cash from your bank account will most likely deny FDIC indemnification.

    Cyprus and the EU are advocates of the “Dire Straights” school of economics:

    only instead of guitars, they are simply taking it.

    I R A Darth Aggie | March 26, 2013 at 10:50 am

    The Russians would be foolish to leave their money there. They will pull out, and go some were safer. I’m not sure were that is, tho.

    This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.

    A slightly more understandable version of the clip:

    Henry Hawkins | March 26, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    Man, the backrooms of Washington DC and the state capitals must be awash with the drool of lefty statists, all rubbing their grimy little hands together as they plot and plan to act on this precedent.

      TrooperJohnSmith in reply to Henry Hawkins. | March 26, 2013 at 4:22 pm

      …only to find out that they cause a run on under-capitalized banks, which collapse in record numbers, taking whole financial systems with them, and by extension, those same left-wing governments. Then, no telling what beasts begin slinking towards Jerusalem…

      “Nice going, you stupid lefties!”

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend