Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03
    Announcement
     
    Announcement
     

    Mother Nature and WSJ Mock Climate-Change Bullies

    Mother Nature and WSJ Mock Climate-Change Bullies

    Despite the best efforts of progressives who want to use global warming to control human consumption and the media that supports these efforts, it seems Mother Nature is not following their script.

    Some examples:

    I have long been a skeptic of the science behind “climate change”, and have reported on the distortions and false assumptions that form key elements of the man-made global warming assertions.

    Today, I am delighted to report that even non-scientists are beginning to question the premise that humans are impacting the climate.  Holman W. Jenkins Jr. is a member of the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal and writes editorials and the weekly Business World column.  His latest Wall Street  Journal article touches upon some of the climate science data inanity:

    Our ‘Hottest Year’ and Al Gore’s Epic Failure

    Said the New York Times climate blog, in an assertion that was echoed throughout the media: “The temperature differences between years are usually measured in fractions of a degree, but 2012 blew away the previous record, set in 1998, by a full degree Fahrenheit.”

    Really? If that were true, then hair-on-fire news should have been the fact that 2012 was 2.13 degrees hotter than 2011. That’s a far more dramatic change, and in a single year.

    Nor was it mentioned that 2008, in the contiguous U.S., was two degrees cooler than 2006. Or that 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were all cooler than 1998 by a larger margin than 2012 was hotter than 1998.

    Are you getting the picture? None of this was mentioned because it makes a mockery of using trends in the Lower 48 as a proxy for global warming, the misguided intent that permeated media coverage of the NOAA revelation.

    He makes a most fascinating comparison to gun control advocacy as well:

    But climate change and gun control have one thing in common. Their advocates are more interested in asserting their moral superiority and denouncing their “enemies” than in making progress, which explains why there has been no progress.

    Then, Jenkins ties it together with the “Carbon Tax” concept promoted by Al Gore to reduce carbon dioxide emissions:

    Their idea, known as the “double dividend,” proposed a carbon tax to change energy-use patterns while the proceeds would be used to reduce taxes on labor and capital and encourage economic growth… Yet advocates of a carbon tax are all but invisible in the debate. Mr. Gore and his allies wore out their welcome with their exaggerations, their self-righteousness, and their perfectly foolish insistence (like the gun controllers) that a plurality of voters could be morally bullied into giving up their self-interest if chastised long and loudly enough by Mr. Gore.

    As more and more people are living the weather and looking at the numbers, fewer and fewer are buying into “climate change” panic that will freeze the economic engines driving our economy, prosperity and liberties.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    Ragspierre | January 12, 2013 at 5:11 pm

    Yeh…well, it has been shown that NASA cooked their own books.

    Hardly remarkable, when you consider that the point man for NASA is a complete FREAKING witch-doctor who has likened Canadian oil to heroin.

    Frankly, I bet LOTS of places in the world would KILL for some actual “warming”…


       
       0 
       
       0
      Juba Doobai! in reply to Ragspierre. | January 12, 2013 at 8:26 pm

      Right now I would for some warming where I am. Uninsulated brick building that sweats when it warms. No persistent heat except for a NZ bed warmer pad. No lasting heat except for a Midea rileng unit which blows cold air during the shut off process.

      These guys are quacks,to a man. IMO, with Gore, it was all about screwing things up for Dubya and making money. It was always about the Communist Democrat agenda of power and control.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Rosalie | January 12, 2013 at 5:59 pm

    Actually, the scientists who are doing their job predict a mini ice age. Didn’t the global warmists predict that the UK would no longer get snow and then they were inundated with it? Where are they getting their information? Oh, that’s right, they’re making it up.


     
     0 
     
     0
    GrumpyOne | January 12, 2013 at 6:09 pm

    I think that climate change is undeniable.

    But… The “human caused” angle is bogus at best. And the pro-warmists have been caught time after time manipulating the numbers to suit their agenda which consists of nothing more than a grab for money, power and control.

    The next time that anyone preaches the merits of global warming, ask them why are adjacent planets like Jupitor, Mars, etc. also warming?

    The alarmists point to their models and when you consider that models utilized by meteorologists every day for short term forecasting are often less than accurate, how can you expect any rational being to accept the alarmists’ long term model prognosis?

    Besides, when one considers the role of the sun influencing climate trends, how could mere mortals alter *that* course? Try emptying out the Gulf of Mexico with a few buckets??

    But, we can always blame Bush, right?


       
       0 
       
       0
      Ragspierre in reply to GrumpyOne. | January 13, 2013 at 9:16 am

      One of the very few truths about global climate that actual observation reveals is that it WILL change, because it HAS changed.

      Long before man. Since man. And even since the Industrial Revolution.

      As a guy who likes to think on a global level (i.e., not in the weeds), I have often asked why the immense release of CO2 from volcanic activity produces no clearly linked “change” in global temperatures?

      Nobody seems to like that question…

        Ragspierre: As a guy who likes to think on a global level (i.e., not in the weeds), I have often asked why the immense release of CO2 from volcanic activity produces no clearly linked “change” in global temperatures?

        Volcanoes emit far less CO2 than humans. However, volcanoes also emit sulfate aerosols, which can have a significant cooling effect. Major eruptions can used to estimate climate sensitivity, by the way.
        http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/gas/climate.php

        See also Wigley et al., Effect of climate sensitivity on the response to volcanic forcing, Journal of Geophysical Research 2005.


           
           0 
           
           0
          Ragspierre in reply to Zachriel. | January 14, 2013 at 8:05 am

          “While sulfur dioxide released in contemporary volcanic eruptions has occasionally caused detectable global cooling of the lower atmosphere, the carbon dioxide released in contemporary volcanic eruptions has never caused detectable global warming of the atmosphere. This is probably because the amounts of carbon dioxide released in contemporary volcanism have not been of sufficient magnitude to produce detectable global warming.”

          Call me unimpressed…

            Ragspierre: Call me unimpressed…

            Not sure your personal incredulity represents much of an argument.

            Gerlach, Volcanic Versus Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide, EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 2011: “Which emits more carbon dioxide (CO2): Earth’s volcanoes or human activities? Research findings indicate unequivocally that the answer to this frequently asked question is human activities.”

            Our original citation to the United States Geological Survey should have had sufficient authority. However, we have provided you a journal review paper containing relevant citations to the scientific literature.


             
             0 
             
             0
            Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | January 14, 2013 at 10:04 am

            You seem to have a very definite bias here…you and your mouse.

            Now you’re arguing against a proposition I never suggested (i.e., CO2 from volcanic activity exceeds that from human activity).

            Nor have you offered any damn thing that speaks to my original question.

            Save your time and typing. I find you typical of the AGW coreligionists.

            Ragspierre: Nor have you offered any damn thing that speaks to my original question.

            Sure we have. This is your original comment.

            Ragspierre: As a guy who likes to think on a global level (i.e., not in the weeds), I have often asked why the immense release of CO2 from volcanic activity produces no clearly linked “change” in global temperatures?

            Because present-day volcanic outgassings of CO2, being less than 1% of anthropogenic emissions, are negligible in terms of climate forcing.

    their perfectly foolish insistence (like the gun controllers) that a plurality of voters could be morally bullied into giving up their self-interest if chastised long and loudly enough by Mr. Gore.

    I have begun to notice a creeping onset of bitterness and anger among the Twitter Second Amendment Infringers unlike their projected certainty of moral superiority in the days following the shooting in Newtown, CT.

    That’s what happens to fact-less screamers when they start to realize they are outnumbered and “outfacted” day after day and as they watch Piers Morgan likewise lurch and flutter about like a great white goose caught in snare.


     
     0 
     
     0
    LukeHandCool | January 12, 2013 at 6:25 pm

    The arrogance of man to believe that a dynamic system like climate should become static, with a “normal” baseline based upon the coincidental snapshot in time he started to measure it.

    I’m more afraid of what will happen by Y2.016K with the “One” in charge.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend