Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Obama shoots the First Amendment, aims later

    Obama shoots the First Amendment, aims later

    The Chinese (allegedly) have a curse: May you live in interesting times.

    These are interesting times.

    It is hard to overstate the significance of what it means when the free exercise of our First Amendment rights while not breaking any laws leads to this:

    A Southern California filmmaker linked to an anti-Islamic movie inflaming protests across the Middle East was interviewed by federal probation officers at a Los Angeles sheriff’s station but was not arrested or detained, authorities said early Saturday.

    Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, was interviewed at the station in his hometown of Cerritos, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Deputy Don Walker said.

    Federal officials have said they were investigating the activities of Nakoula, who has been convicted of financial crimes. If the probation department determines Nakoula violated terms of his release, a judge could send him back to prison.

    Let’s recap: The man made a film.  He posted it to Youtube.  People across the ocean used it as a pretext for rioting and murder that were anyway preplanned.  Yet the Obama Administration actually, really, seriously asked Google to have the video taken down (request thankfully denied).  Then the feds sent goons to interrogate the man, hoping to find some technical grounds on which to punish him for interrupting the president’s campaign narrative.

    Now let’s climb into the Wayback Machine to see how a filmmaker from another era, whose output provoked murderous violence in this country, was treated by the government.

    In March 1991, an amateur filmmaker testing out his new video camera captured the beating by several LAPD officers of a man we’d later come to know as Rodney King.  The filmmaker’s name was George Holiday.

    The next morning, he called police and tried to find out what the black guy had done to be beaten so badly. Cops refused to say anything.

    Shaken by what he’d witnessed, Holliday felt someone should know about it.

    That Monday morning, he called KTLA-TV. He told them what he had and he offered to bring the tape over that afternoon.

    Holiday’s footage became the first viral video.

    It led to the indictments and trial of the cops involved.  A year later, when they were acquitted, citizens inflamed by the film that they’d seen dozens of times immediately began turning Los Angeles into a war zone.  Over the next six days of rioting, 53 people were killed and more than 2,000 were hurt.  Property damage totaled hundreds of millions of dollars.

    And never did the DOJ or FBI show up at Holiday’s door.  For that matter, neither did the LAPD.

    Of course, that was 20 years ago.  When we still had a First Amendment.

    Nakoula Basseley Nakoula

    The “filmmaker” with L.A. County Sheriff’s deputies. Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.



    Donald Douglas | September 15, 2012 at 4:41 pm

    This is all messed up. More thoughts here: ‘The Muslim World Still Hates America’.

    […] From Le*gal In*sur*rec*tion: Obama shoots the First Amendment, aims later […]

    theduchessofkitty | September 15, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    Professor Reynolds read The One the Riot Act. And well-read.

    Best bit:

    By sending — literally — brownshirted enforcers to engage in — literally — a midnight knock at the door of a man for the non-crime of embarrassing the President of the United States and his administration, President Obama violated [the Oath of Office]. You can try to pretty this up (It’s just about possible probation violations! Sure.), or make excuses or draw distinctions, but that’s what’s happened. It is a betrayal of his duties as President, and a disgrace.

    Since The One will never resign, may I suggest that we begin a push in Congress to draft Articles of Impeachment against that bastard?

    Major face-palm moment. I’m still stunned by it. The only explanation is that the producer is insane.

    NBC News, this evening’s newscast. Lester Holt presiding. A reporter conducts an interview of Libya’s President in which the President states unequivocally that the consulate attack was not a spontaneous uprising in response to a film or any other thing but rather a well-planned attack that had been in preparation for some time. Stated flatly that they have irrefutable proof.

    Immediately, immediately, at the conclusion of the interview, Holt goes to a segment ‘on the film at the center’ of all the trouble (I’m paraphrasing), including an on-site report from in front of the alleged filmmaker’s home and extensive critical coverage of what people and groups might have had anything to do with the film. Time devoted was longer than the segment including the Libyan President’s interview.

    Talk about ‘shiny object journalism’. Squirrel !!!

    All I can say is, “Gob. Smack.”

      Daiwa in reply to Daiwa. | September 15, 2012 at 10:03 pm

      And for the icing on the cake. Of course.

      The local NBC affiliate’s newscast which followed included a segment on the continuing anti-American unrest in the Muslim world ‘triggered by an internet video’ (I’m paraphrasing again).

      My wife, an Obamaphile if there ever was one, understands how dishonest this is.

      (An aside – I live in a ‘neutral’ home, one with no net influence on any election one way or the other.)

    […] that is offering political commentary. Professor Jacobson and I were thinking along the same lines: Click HERE for his and this is my […]

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend