Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Not all Democrats are anti-Israel, but almost all anti-Israelis are Democrats

    Not all Democrats are anti-Israel, but almost all anti-Israelis are Democrats

    Dems platform changes worse for Israel than originally thought.

    All the attention this week was focused on the removal of “God” and reference to Jerusalem as Israel’s capital from the DNC platform.  Those terms were reinserted based on the rused that two-thirds of delegates approved, when it was clear that there was not the-thirds support on the voice vote.

    But the initial removal of Jerusalem from the platform was not the only problem, as reported by The Times of Israel, Jewish Democrats still unhappy with corrected party platform, which omits clauses on Hamas, refugees and borders:

    The platform was handled “by children,” one Jewish leader in Charlotte who asked to remain anonymous told The Times of Israel.

    In the kind of scathing critique that reporters heard from multiple sources this week, the longtime Jewish activist said, “The people responsible for the platform did such a terrible job working on the wording because they did not conduct an inclusive process with members of the [pro-Israel] community. That’s what leud to this problem, and those people should be held responsible.”

    What’s more, some pro-Israel activists are far from satisfied even with the corrected language in the platform.

    Said longtime Democrat and prominent law professor Alan Dershowitz: “I would like to see the president make statements over the course of the coming weeks which re-affirm what was said in the 2008 platform, not only with regards to Jerusalem, but in regard to the borders, the refugees and with regard to Hamas,” he said. Off-the-record, other Jewish Democratic insiders echo the objections.

    The 2008 platform had demanded “the isolation of Hamas until that organization renounces terrorism and accepts other requirements of the peace process,” insisted that “any settlement of the so-called ‘refugees’ question in a final settlement make a future Palestinian state, not Israel, the destination for Palestinian ‘refugees,’” and noted “that it’s not realistic to expect [the] outcome of negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949.”

    But not to worry, Debbie “Alternative Universe” Wasserman-Shultz say all the controversy arose from a mere technical oversight:

    Actually, the real universe is that the Democratic Party is the home to antil-Israelis.  Not all Democrats are anti-Israel, but almost all anti-Israelis are Democrats.

    Update: Joel Engel reminds me of this column he wrote before the 2004 election for The Weekly Standard:

    The evidence is overwhelming that acceptable anti-Semitism has moved from right to left on the political continuum, and that its philosophical home now resides in the Democratic party, which has become less the party of liberals than of leftists. Even before Al Sharpton stood as a presidential candidate last year, Democratic politicians genuflecting for black votes–Al Gore, Bill Bradley, and Hillary Clinton, for example–often trekked up to Harlem to kiss his ring. And yet, this was a man who in previous years had either led or instigated two anti-Jewish demonstrations, one in Crown Heights and one in Harlem, which together resulted in the deaths of eight people. Does that matter to Democrats and John Kerry? Apparently not. Sharpton was rewarded with a choice slot at the Democratic National Convention, something that is impossible to imagine being given to the likes of former Republican David Duke, whose incitements have frankly born far less blood than Sharpton’s.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    beloved2 | September 8, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    Baruk Hashem. Israel is forever! America IS NOT the G-d of Israel. America needs the blessings of the G-d of Israel more than Israel needs the military help of America. Israelis have the eternal covenant recorded in the Holy Tanakh whereas America only has the promise of blessing when America blesses Israel. The covenant of Abraham is over 5,000 years old and still legally valid. For the week prior to the D convention there was outreach to Muslims. The Muslims were the NO voices heard when the amendment to restore phrase “Jerusalem is capital of Israel”. All Muslims are anti-Israeli!

    Wasserman-Schultz is a Jewess with a large constituency of Jews in Broward County. Someone explain what is up with that woman? Self-hatred? Ethnic hatred? I don’t get it.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Frank Scarn in reply to beloved2. | September 8, 2012 at 4:00 pm

      I think the more penetrating question is, What’s up with the voters in her district?

      My answer. When Democrats are elected – and they’ve all become looney lefties now, not just the obvious ones like Schumer, Pelosi, Durbin, Jackson Lee, Waters et alia – it is a testament to just how well public schooling has succeeded. From the statist’s POV, it is very successful. For the constitutionalist, not so much.


         
         0 
         
         0
        n.n in reply to Frank Scarn. | September 8, 2012 at 11:54 pm

        They fail to recognize they will necessarily exchange their liberty for submission with benefits. Unfortunately, a large minority of people would voluntarily accept the latter. They are not strictly American or they are the product of corrupted culture.

        Interesting note about Schumer, is that his perception of reality in private differs from his public expression. For example, he recognizes the merits of evolutionary fitness, and promotes it among his female staff. Perhaps not every Democrat supports evolutionary suicide.

    First, the Catholics supported greater government intervention in medical provision and funding. The Democrats exploited their good intentions to attack their faith. Second, the Jews supported policies of redistributive change, social justice, evolutionary dysfunction, etc. The Democrats exploited their “good” intentions to undermine their support. Whether it is good or “good” intentions, their principles in practice engender progressive (i.e. cultural) corruption. Both groups failed to recognize that the left is guided by an ideology which seeks to gain leverage through the exploitation of human weakness and divergence. Both the Catholics and Jews contributed their wealth, and voices, and are no longer required to sustain the movement. They have become disposable and interchangeable as every other human being, from conception to grave.

    […] Not all Democrats are anti-Israel, but almost all anti-Israelis are Democrats […]


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend