Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    We still need a wave

    We still need a wave

    When it comes to the House, Republicans don’t need a wave.  Via Charlie Cook:

    One might have expected that two years after Republicans picked up 63 House seats—the biggest gain in a midterm election since 1938—Democrats would be on track to win back a boatload of those districts that the GOP didn’t have much business winning in the first place. But a little more than four months out from the election, the tides seem about as neutral as they can be. Both parties have surprisingly comparable levels of exposure, largely because of redistricting. The relatively calm surface of this year’s waters belies a lot of offsetting tumult and change underneath. But for House Republicans, who hold a 25-seat majority, a status quo election producing minimal net change would be good news.

    When it comes to the House that may be right, but we still need a wave to take back the Senate, and to do so by more than a 1-vote margin which leaves us at the mercy of the weakest link.

    And we also need that wave to overcome the structural advantages Obama has (sure win in several large electoral states, incumbency, people wanting free stuff, etc.).

    So wave.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    One telling point. There are a growing number of dems distancing themselves from their parties position. More telling ,Pelosi is allowing if not encouraging it. On the other GOP side our leadership shows signs of growing a spine. l suspect the freshmen are having a growing impact.

    Ragspierre | June 29, 2012 at 11:49 am

    I think the tactic of pressing a repeal vote on ObamaCare in the Senate is a great idea.

    Let each Deemocrat senator have to step up to their tax hike monstrosity before the election. Expose them to that theme.

    I’m feeling pretty tidal, myself. “Intensity” just got turned up to 11.

    Henry Hawkins | June 29, 2012 at 4:21 pm

    A potential source of pressure on Obama/Dems, given that Obamacare represents the largest tax hike in world history, is the fact that the expiring Bush tax cuts looming on the horizon would constitute the second largest tax hike in history. Ouch. Go ahead, Dems. Approve both of them. On the record. On video.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend