Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Elizabeth Warren’s “weird choices”

    Elizabeth Warren’s “weird choices”

    It’s a pattern laid out by Meghan McArdle in July 2010, Considering Elizabeth Warren, the Scholar.

    Read the whole thing, but here’s an excerpt:

    But while I found the thesis compelling, there were some problems with the book.  The first is that Warren simply fails to grapple with what her thesis suggests about the net benefits of the two-earner family.  Admittedly, I don’t quite know what to say either, but at least I can acknowledge that it’s a pretty powerful problem for the current family model; Warren kind of waves her hands and mumbles about social programs and more supportive work environments.  There is no possible solution outside of a more left-wing government.

    But the deeper problem is that some of her evidence doesn’t really support her thesis, and can be made to appear to support her thesis only by making some very weird choices about what metrics to use….

    That’s a pattern I see over and over in her work.  In  her (in)famous paper on medical bankruptcies in 2001, Warren and her  co-authors defined anyone with $1000 worth of medical bills as having a  medical bankruptcy, and used that figure to imply that rising medical  bills were pushing people over the financial edge.  Now maybe they are,  but you sure couldn’t prove it with that metric….

    Does it matter? I think yes.

    Warren has reached scholarly conclusions which she then parlays into a political platform.  The interaction between the two is fair game in an election, as much as a candidate’s business or political experience.

    More to come.

    Update: A reader writes:

    Good Afternoon Professor –

    I follow your site regularly but never comment because of the “sign in” factor. Now and then I see something worth pointing out though. You write

    “Warren has reached scholarly conclusions which she then parlays into a political platform.”

    I think you have that backwards. I think Warren has a political platform which she doctors her data and “scholarly” conclusions to fit.

    Have a great afternoon.

    I think this reader may have it right. Which came first, the scholarship or the political platform?

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    Aarradin | June 6, 2012 at 5:43 pm

    She is not alone in doing this. The majority, probably the vast majority, of ‘research’ that is either paid for by the government or conducted to advance a political cause is completely bogus.

    Warren’s ‘work’ is in no way exceptional here.

    You start with a political position for legislation that you want to see enacted. Then you find some academic willing to publish a paper supporting your position. If you have sufficient pull in politics then you fund this ‘research’ with taxpayer dollars. Once the paper is published, you make sure it makes as big splash in the media as possible. You then get it cited on the floor of the legislature. When the legislature holds hearings on the issue, you make sure your academic testifies for the committee (often for a fee, paid by taxpayers).

    This, by the way, is how 4, yes 4, millionaires in CO had so much success in their efforts to turn the state blue. They understood the laziness of reporters. They created a few think tanks to churn out ‘research’, funded by tax dollars, that would support their causes. They then fed this garbage to lazy, but friendly, reporters.

    Create an echo chamber, control the message, control the news cycle, change the boundaries of discussion, pass your agenda into law.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Anon Y. Mous | June 6, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    Ms. McArdle spells her first name as “Megan”. When I see Meghan, I think of McCain (shudder).


     
     0 
     
     0
    Zhombre | June 6, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    I’ve followed your site for a while but not until now did I register, in order to post this comment. The guy who left the previous comment: “I think Warren has a political platform which she doctors her data and “scholarly” conclusions to fit,” IMHO has it exactly right. I’ve worked for the fed in insolvency since 1992 and am familiar with Warren’s Harvard “studies” on medical bankruptcy (and with criticism of it from Zywicki and others) and I found the study to be nothing more than advocacy for nationalized healthcare presented with patina of science. If the same loose criterion were applied to consumer bankruptcies which include tax liabilities (federal or state) one could argue that taxes were a primary cause of consumer filings.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Aridog in reply to Zhombre. | June 7, 2012 at 11:45 am

      Of course you are absolutely correct. What “puzzled” me was that she could assert a mere $1000 of debt would drive anyone in to bankruptcy court. That anyone accepted such an assertion is even more astounding. Then I remembered, paraphrasing, something President Clinton once said, … “is” depends upon what you mean “is” is.

    McArdle’s critique of Warren certainly appears credible. Yet afaik McArdle has made no attempt to obtain Warren’s data or to repeat the analysis. Afaik McArdle’s posts acknowledge few if any similar commentaries on Warren’s work in the academic or think tank communities.

    I would probably not have posted the previous paragraph if I hadn’t learned that McArdle is heading to Tina Brown’s Newsweek. In my mind as I type is the career “evolution” of “conservatives” like Jennifer Rubin, Davids Brooks & Frum, Andrew Sullivan, et al.

    Trust, but verify.


     
     0 
     
     0
    BannedbytheGuardian | June 6, 2012 at 11:09 pm

    I think the early sociology was an attempt to categorize society from a new methodology .

    Pretty soon it was being used as a tool .

    I got over 90% in Social science methodology & statistics & failed Sociology 101 twice. Hence my budding career as a social scientist ended.

    I coulda been a Champion.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend