Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Elizabeth Warren loses it, lashes out at “right wing extremist” (me)

    Elizabeth Warren loses it, lashes out at “right wing extremist” (me)

    As you know, Elizabeth Warren has been caught in a series of at best misleading and at worst false responses since The Boston Herald first broke the story in late April that Harvard Law promoted her as Native American in the mid-to-late 1990s.

    First she played dumb and said she didn’t know why.  But over the course of several weeks digging by bloggers and newspapers punctured Warren’s story, and revealed or forced Warren to admit she listed herself as Native American to get on a list of “Minority Law Teachers” in the mid-1980s to mid-1990s, that she informed both Penn Law and Harvard Law that she was Native American for federal reporting purposes, and that she was on a list at Harvard during her “visiting year” of “Women of Color in Legal Academia.”

    Genealogical tracing of Warren’s alleged Cherokee ancestry by a group of Cherokees led by Twila Barnes has shown that Warren has no Cherokee heritage.  The documentation and research has been posted for all to see.  Anger at Warren extends beyond Cherokees.

    Yet Warren persists in the claim to this day, raising bizarre defenses such as her Aunt Bea told her her ancestors had high cheekbones “like all the Indians” and that her parents supposedly had to elope because her mother was 1/16 Native American.

    As you know, a group of four Cherokee women including Barnes traveled to Boston this week to seek a meeting with Warren, who has refused to do so.  The Boston press has been all over it, including The Herald, The Globe, and Fox25 among many others.

    Here is the Boston Herald’s interview:

    Rather than meet with the Cherokee women and prove her heritage or apologize, Warren’s response has been to create a shiny object for the press to focus on, a “right wing extremist“:

    Warren’s camp responded late today with this statement: “The people of Massachusetts are concerned about their jobs, the future for their kids, and the security of their retirement. Scott Brown would rather talk about anything else. The out-of-state group in question is being promoted and supported by a right wing extremist who is on the record supporting and contributing money to Scott Brown. It is past time we moved on to the important issues facing middle class families in Massachusetts – even if Scott Brown won’t.”

    The Warren statement does not identify the “right wing extremist,” but her campaign has been feeding my name to dutiful scriveners at places such as CBS Boston, who use old information from the Brown-Coakley race:

    Sorry Professor Warren, you created the problem and you own it.  No one else.

    You could have put this issue to rest early on, but you and you alone chose a campaign of deception and hiding, in the hope it would go away.  Now you hope to distract from your own failings with yet another diversion.

    So you can keep flashing that shiny object, but you cannot make the issue go away until you come clean, release all records, and stop pointing the finger at others.

    The truth will out.

    And all the millions you pocket when you go to Hollywood or Wall Street cannot change that.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    I agree that it’s silly for her to lash out and call you a right wing extremist. You’re no right winger nor extremist; you’re a neoconservative who loves big government and denigrates limited government people such as Ron Paul.

    […] While the left is jumping all over this as a sign of weakness I see just the opposite.  If you’ve got a sitting GOP senator unfazed by incurring the inevitable media wrath of the MSM in Massachusetts that tells you where this election is going almost as much as Former Obama Administration Official Elizabeth Warren getting spooked by conservative bloggers. […]


     
     0 
     
     0
    deadrody | June 22, 2012 at 2:55 am

    Logically speaking, why on Earth would Scott Brown NOT want to talk about the economy ? You know, the thing run directly into the ground by Democrats in the last 3 years ?

    Scott Brown does not need to distract anyone from the economy under the stewardship of his opponents party. That idea is moronic.

    […] intimidating them has been a lengthy one for quite sometime, so it behooves us not to forget that William Jacobson was recently targeted and, as I reported here last year here, Donald Douglas has been for a while.  In fact, Tuesday […]


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend