Call it the War on Women’s Eyes.
I think Andrew Kaczynski has it right:
No, actually, I know he is right:
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
DONATE
Ron Coleman
Comments
I think it was that Newsweek cover of Michele that torpedoed her presidential aspirations. I don’t think she recovered from it.
No I think it was her awful candidacy that did it. I’m still amazed at what an empty suit she is. She was great at spouting platitudes though! Fooled the tea party people.
i’m neither a warren fan nor a bachmann hater but c’mon…this is an unfair comparison. warren is caught making a facial expression in a candid shot whereas bachmann’s posing for a portrait. compare the newsweek cover to any other photo of bachmann…that’s just how she looks.
I disagree El Polacko. Michele Bachmann is a very very attractive- almost beautiful & looks largely natural. She is streets ahead of any 54 year old Hollywood cosmetically /surgically interventioned thing.
There is that photo of her campaigning in SC in a rust dress & white bead necklace. Just perfection.
Also her son is distinctly handsome. The other 4 managed to evade the LSM -perhaps because they were also attractive & successful.
Michele Bachmann is a religious zealot, and also….well, kinda batty.
The picture says something about her beyond just the image, which is what photo editors look for. She’s got that thousand-yard stare.
The picture of Warren just shows her in the middle of….well, can’t really say. She looks like she might be about to sneeze.
Warren still has sanpaku eyes, which I don’t think can be blamed on being a candid shot.
Leave a Comment