Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Today it seems like it’s all about Newt

    Today it seems like it’s all about Newt

    Q.  Who was the last person to actually cut government?

    As pointed out at C4P:

    Rush is correct. Newt was indeed the last person to substantially cut Government and execute reform.

    However; what folks seem to confuse that with is the idea that Newt actually “cut” budgets. That was never true. He cut Government, balanced a budget, and passed Welfare Reform. Up until the Obama administration in 2009, the passing became “Clinton’s welfare reform” among liberals who were originally reluctant to Newt’s idea. They then decided to shift the credit to Clinton once they saw how successful it was.

    Further, it needs to be noted that Welfare Reform was rolled back entirely with Obama’s stimulus in 2009.

    Another must read is Rush’s The So-Called Conservative Media Attacks Newt Gingrich:

    And finally, the Tweet of the Day from Jazz Shaw, referencing this post exercise in self-parody, Gingrich: Most likely to kiss up to the liberal elite:

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    JEBurke | December 6, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    Today, Mark Steyn recalled what he wrote about Newt in 1998 and noted that he believes it still describes the ex-Speaker to a tee. I agree.

    The Democrats demonised Newt as an extreme right-wing crazy. They were right – apart from the ‘extreme’ and ‘right-wing’, that is. Most of the above seem more like the burblings of a frustrated self-help guru than blueprints for conservative government. For example, Pillar No. 5 of (Newt’s) ‘Five Pillars of American Civilisation’ is: ‘Total quality management’. Unfortunately for Newt, the person who most needed a self-help manual was him – How to Win Friends and Influence People for a start. After last week’s election, Republicans have now embarked on the time-honoured ritual, well known to British Tories and Labour before them, of bickering over whether they did badly because they were too extreme or because they were too moderate. In Newt’s case, the answer is both. He spent the last year pre-emptively surrendering on anything of legislative consequence, but then, feeling bad at having abandoned another two or three of his ‘Fourteen Steps to Renewing American Civilisation’, he’d go on television and snarl at everybody in sight… For Republicans it was the worst of all worlds: a lily-livered ninny whom everyone thinks is a ferocious right-wing bastard.


     
     0 
     
     0
    kobayashi | December 6, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    According to http://www.minneapolisfed.org/community_education/teacher/calc/hist1913.cfm Calendar year 1921 had GDP growth of minus 10.9%.

    By comparison calendar year 1932 had GDP growth of minus 10.3%.

    In 1932 FDR won the election on a platform of cutting [real] spending 25%.

    That was based on what the Harding/Coolidge administration actually accomplished in cutting Federal Taxes and Expenditures and Regulations thus recovering from the -10.9% ‘1920 Depression’ INSIDE 18 months, in the process creating the Manufacturing Infrastracture that in WWII …
    They were assisted by a Federal Reserve that [in this instance] Did Exactly the Right Thing instead of Exactly The Wrong thing we’re seeing today here and in Europe.

    http://www.minneapolisfed.org/community_education/teacher/calc/

    http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/151.html

    Within today’s Federal Reserve System it’s the Kansas City Federal Reserve that’s “Austrian Economics”

    Coolidge was Reagan’s “Hero”.

    Harding and Coolidge were the nominees in the 1920 Election
    primarily because Teddy Roosevelt died in 1919.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1920

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_election

    Never Forget Roosevelt and the Start of The [first] Progressive Era that was ended by the 1920 Depression, Harding/Coolidge, and “The Roaring Twenties”.

    At National Review they’re throwing the lifesaver out to Mitt too. The most interesting and balanced take is Yuval Levin’s saying that they’re much alike, but temperamentally Mitt would be much better than Newt at exercising executive power.

    Funny thing is that Levin names Newt’s two big conservative accomplishments (balanced budget and welfare reform), but names none for Mitt (obviously sidestepping Romneycare) even though Mitt’s supposed executive record “is very impressive”.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/285083/choice-two-temperaments-yuval-levin

    The arguments against Newt keep pushing me toward him.


     
     0 
     
     0
    herm2416 | December 6, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    Completely off topic! I used the good professor’s link to amazon. I just bought some Brun Uusto baked cheese……grill it or sauté it, it doesn’t melt! Great appetizer. : )

    New York Post John Podhoretz: Newt’s second act
    He’ll make great target for O
    via http://hotair.com/

    Just who in the hell do these anti-Newt people want, to oppose Obama?

    Romney and his iciness with ‘friendlies’ asking questions would get roasted in debates with Obama. He would lose his cool.

    The ‘dirt’, team Obama would pull on Newt, is less of a pile then the mountain of ‘dirt’ Obama has piled up going into his fourth year. Unless of course Axlerod finds a few more sexual harassers in Chicago, that scream NEWT did this.

    When that fails ‘hey, we always have the race card, Barack.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend