Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    “The idea that we could have controlled that process is absurd”

    “The idea that we could have controlled that process is absurd”

    That’s Doug Mataconis pushing back against my post We know who lost Egypt and similar arguments by others.

    The push back misses the point.  Whether or not we could have controlled the situation — and whether or not we should have tried — the fact is that we threw Mubarack overboard in just one week without giving him a chance to reform or deal with the protests.  On February 2 Robert Gibbs announced the U.S. position:

    Last night, Obama issued a brief public statement that included just one line about a prospective deadline for Mubarak’s exit from power: “My belief is that an orderly transition must be meaningful, must be peaceful and it must begin now,” Obama said.

    But White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was more explicit Wednesday.

    “‘Now’ means ‘yesterday,'” Gibbs explained. “When we said ‘now,’ we meant ‘yesterday’… that’s what the people of Egypt want to see,” Gibbs said, adding that a process that begins one week, one month, or many months from now won’t suffice.

    One could make a good argument that we should not have intervened at all.  But having intervened, we should have done so responsibly.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    @JBSCanada | December 3, 2011 at 12:12 am

    Having become somewhat less enthusiastic with the level of commentary on this thread, I have decided to leave it and pursue higher dialogue, elsewhere.

    To those insightful commentators whose thoughts and ideas I have read about here; I salute you!

    John Brian Shannon


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend