Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Start screaming in 5, 4, 3, 2 …

    Start screaming in 5, 4, 3, 2 …

    From The Daily News:

    Santa won’t bother going to poor countries this year, so the United Nations Children’s Fund will go instead — or at least that’s the message behind a satirical new UNICEF advertisement released in Sweden….

    In a sometimes confusing and grammatically questionable rant, Santa then explains why health care doesn’t make for good Christmas presents.

    “This ain’t no Christmas gift. So, you buy this products for your friend, and all this stuff goes to poor kids? Like in Africa?” Santa asks, before skeptically examining a vaccine bottle with a magnifying glass, shaking a bottle of pills and squirting the contents of a syringe into the air.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    DINORightMarie | December 20, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    According to Stanley Kurtz in his book Radical-in-Chief, UNICEF is a front group for “underground” Marxists/socialists, as are many non-profits, work-training programs, VISTA, and those get-out-the-vote programs.

    I used to do the “Trick or Treat for UNICEF” – little did I know I was aiding leftists and Marxists who hate America………


     
     0 
     
     0
    WarEagle82 | December 20, 2011 at 7:07 pm

    Well, UNICEF is certainly doing a great job reining in poverty throughout the world.

    The sad part is they may be the least ineffective part of the whole UN…

    Doesn’t UNICEF have the usual UN issues with child rape, shakedowns, shady financial transactions, forced sterilizations, abortion, social engineering and such?

    Is it any surprise they’d attack a Christian figure like Santa– the modern descendant-meme of a Saint that, traditionally, tried to save girls from being sold into sex slavery?


       
       0 
       
       0
      JerryB in reply to Foxfier. | December 20, 2011 at 7:23 pm

      You beat me to it, Foxfier. UNICEF, UNFPA (population control), and WHO are all the same outfit, right? It’s eugenics central, i.e., eliminating poverty by eliminating the poor. The WHO got caught in the 90’s giving abortifacient-laced tetanus vaccines to “undesirables” in the Philippines and elsewhere. Yet more reasons to get the US out of the UN.

    The problems throughout most, if not all of Africa, follow from authoritarian distress (e.g. despotic regimes, rebels with a cause and without a clue). Another problem, if it is their intention to enjoy individual liberty, is that there is no common moral code, and they instead rely on progressive levels of totalitarian policies meted through the sword. The latter, by its nature, is incapable of preserving individual dignity.

    That the UN does not comprehend the underlying corruptive factors, and resorts to the left-wing tactic of appeals to emotion in order to extort concessions and quell dissent, would suggest that the UN is either incompetent or similarly corrupt.

    The UN follows the same model of fundamental corruption which underlies the most regressive regimes: dreams of instant gratification (e.g. physical, material, ego).


       
       0 
       
       0
      BannedbytheGuardian in reply to n.n. | December 21, 2011 at 3:05 am

      Wow nn -I would have just put it down to the fact that African men are pigs who treat women like shit. Thus everything is shitty.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend