Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Romney now all negative all the time, just like in 2008

    Romney now all negative all the time, just like in 2008

    Mitt Romney’s campaign has been moving negative on Newt for well over a week with a strategy to portray Newt as crazy, but since Romney’s debate debacle Saturday night and more polling showing Newt with a crushing lead almost everywhere, the Romney campaign now is completely negative.

    And as I predicted, Romney is leaving it to interviews and attack ads, having failed to confront Newt in any meaningful manner face-to-face at the debate.

    Today Romney demanded that Newt give back the consulting money he earned from Freddie Mac.

    Unfortunately, while still saying he would try to remain positive, Newt took some of Romney’s bait and fired back that he’d consider it if Romney returned all the money Romney made off of bankrupt companies.  I think Newt doesn’t need to go there, and I bet Romney would be willing to bet $10,000 Newt regrets falling for Romney’s negative trap.

    Romney also is keeping up his strategy of crazy, launching a new website devoted entirely to calling Newt “unreliable.”

    No one should be surprised, because the Romney campaign turned all negative early on during the 2008 election cycle when Romney failed to connect with voters.  It’s no coincidence that’s it’s happening again, Michael Scherer predicted Mitt Romney’s Return to Negativeland several days ago:

    The negative spots have already started showing up, and in a matter of days they will be ubiquitous for the poor souls trying to watch the evening news in Iowa and New Hampshire. Because of recent changes in campaign finance regulation, the onslaught may even be greater and nastier than years past because candidates will have some distance from the Super PAC attacks on their behalf.

    What’s interesting about Romney’s expected turn to the dark side is how much it resembles what was happening in Iowa and New Hampshire in December of 2008 [sic – 2007]. Then Romney was facing an apparent surge in the polls by Mike Huckabee in Iowa and John McCain in Massachusetts. The Romney response was nothing less than Spy
    vs. Spy or Hatfield vs. McCoy.

    Here are two examples linked by Scherer of anti-Huckabee and anti-McCain ads run by Romney.  We’ll see if it works this time.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    […] Romney now all negative all the time, just like in 2008 […]

    BarbaraS | December 13, 2011 at 7:55 pm

    Romney was dumb to say Newt should give back the money he earned from Freddie Mac. Republicans don’t expect something like that and would call Newt stupid or pandering for doing so. Money earned is money earned. Besides, it is doubtful that Newt got all the money. I’ sure his staff got some. Are they supposed to give it back also? Newt answering Romney back on the Bain Capital thingy is really a tit-for-tat remark. I would have thought less of Newt if he had just let it go. This was not a dirty politics remark but a necessary comeback. It was a dumb thing for Romney to say aand he probably said it thinking there would be no backlash.

    BarbaraS | December 13, 2011 at 8:33 pm

    Politics has been nasty since it came into being. It’s a blood sport and anybody participating in this sport had better have a skin as thick as a rhinocerous. Voters who expect civility are deluding themselves. In fact, candidates today are much nicer than they were when the republic began. It was realy ugly then. Actually, Newt has been very forebearing and I hope he continues to be so. His body language needs a little work but he has, by and large, kept his workd about vocal put downs. I wanted Palin and failing her, Perry. I have decided that Perry would be a good candidate in 10 or 15 years but not now. He needs to grow somewhat. In my opinion he comes across as too young. I never considered Romney for one minute. I look at him and listen to him and a big red sign comes up behind him that says false, plastic and insincere. He is a quintessential politicam who tells everybody what they want to hear. Sorta like what we have now. We need a president who will strike fear into the rest of the world. Nothing less will do if we are to survive.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend