Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Romney supporter claims Newt bought my endorsement

    Romney supporter claims Newt bought my endorsement

    The Romney trolls have come out in full force since I ran my post yesterday, Why I Support Newt Gingrich.

    Here’s an e-mail I received this morning (emphasis mine):

    You seem to have been a day early in your Gingrich endorsement, precisely because he has been slinking around under the radar with a joke of a campaign apparatus.  It leads me to think that he paid for your endorsement with his hard-earned crony capitalist dollars. How a day of vetting can change everything.  Throw-away lines at debates are one thing, even as that ineffable word of his, “fundamentally”, grows more tiresome with each predictable utterance.  How he made his living since the summary execution by Bill Clinton is another.

    Unlike Gingrich, Romney’s past was thoroughly vetted during his senatorial and gubernatorial runs.  If Bain was such a bane against his candidacy, how did he manage to be elected Governor of Massachusetts?  A successful governor at that, who managed to piggy-back on Bill Weld’s success and maintain just enough Republican seats in the State Senate to uphold vetos.  A careful review of the senate race against Ted Kennedy, should you be even-handed enough to do so, will show that the polls swung decisively against Romney only after Kennedy pulled a savage anti-Morman shtick in the last three weeks of the campaign.  It was a desperate ploy that worked in heavily Catholic Massachusetts but won’t work in Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Colorado, Nevada, etc.  Unless, that is, you believe Christian Evangelicals will either stand down or swing decisively behind Obama and that anti-Mormonism is something other than religious bigotry.  In fact, Romney would have been a far stronger candidate against Obama in 2008, not pouting in the U.S. Senate while bailing out Wall Street banks and blowing the message as McCain did.

    Does a front-page NY Times article on a nebulous Bain investment, in lieu of coverage of the Republican foreign policy debate in South Carolina, not count as vetting of Romney?  The finest 90 minutes in the history of CBS, Iwould add, facetiously, and so nice of The NY Times not to mention it.  Granted, the Grey Lady has become a joke, mostly, in its political coverage, but it still wields influence.  How else to account for its photo choices — a glum,sleep-deprived Romney contrasted with a smilingly cheerful Obama in the same fold.  How its innards must churn to feel no effect on Republican polling.

    You would be wise to pull a mea culpa and reverse that Gingrich endorsement.

    David Farren
    East Chatham, New York

    I think I’m onto something here.  And by the way, the accusation is false.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    jakee308 | November 17, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    So, how much did you get? Most of those ****** probably think it was thirty pieces of silver.

    I’m guessing it was a autographed book and a promise to consider you for Attorney General. (Lawrence Tribe eat your heart out. Or has he always wanted to be a Supreme?) (NO not with Diana, the OTHER ones.)

    I actually like that folks are hot about a candidate. It shows involvement and an awareness of how important this election will be. I just hope that too many don’t get pouty when their candidate loses and take their vote and stay home.

    That would be a tragedy.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Mutnodjmet | November 17, 2011 at 9:01 pm

    You know, Romney has not ever undergone the intense media-attacks that Newt has had. To be fair, Newt earned some of that media scrutiny. However, it seems to have made Newt stronger and the better candidate. He seems not to buckle when the news goes south for him — like his “candidacy-ending” vacation after losing advisers. I like that.

    If the other candidates were going after Romney effectively, and Romney countered them without cracking up, perhaps I would feel better about the man. But I sense the media is allowing Romney a pass because it plans to give him the same treatment it gave McCain. Or worse. And some of the tactics they may be using against Romney could be based on lies and distortions. At this time, we have no clue how Romney will handle the challenge. I am not easy about this fact. If Romney is the challenger to Obama, I don’t want him to fold under the weight of Chicago-style thuggary,

    Professor — attacking you seems so senseless. Isn’t it your right to like or not like a candidate based on your findings? Attacking you as being “bought” does not seem like a terribly smart move if someone want to persuade you to support Romney. And, shame on them — they haven’t followed you long enough to know how you have fairly considered the others in the GOP line.

    Wotta maroon.

    Give ’em hell, Prof.

    I am not sure where to begin. Kennedy did not have to resort to anti-Mormon bigotry to defeat Romney but Romney did run further left than Teddy. Most of that e-mail is nonsensical wishful thinking and I don’t believe even Romney believes what that guy wrote.
    Either the writer drank too much Kool-aid or his magic underwear cut off his circulation.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend