Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Newt rising, Part 2

    Newt rising, Part 2

    My assessment of the Vegas debate remains the same at the top of the ticket, Perry won by exceeding expectations.  There were some negatives to his performance, such as the issue of Romney’s lawn care company hiring illegals, which even if it was worth a mention hardly was the gotcha it was presented as.  But feisty and combatative is what people are looking for from Perry, and he finally delivered.  The question is, is it to late to change the first impression?

    Cain was damaged not so much by the debate, but by the debate pointing out his policy weaknesses.  He needs to be able to defend 9-9-9 better than saying “go to my website.”  The problem when a candidate runs on a specific policy is that the candidate can rise or fall based on that policy.  Cain also hurt himself by stating in an interview prior to the debate that he would consider releasing all Gitmo detainees if an American solidier were taken hostage; he tried to walk it back during the debate but it didn’t work.  Cain continues to impress, but his weaknesses are beginning to show.  I share the question of many as to whether he is running for President or Vice President.

    Romney survived but for the first time was rattled on Romneycare.  The more he defends it, the worse it seems.  I still think I was right back in February, Sorry Seems To Be Mitt’s Hardest Word.  Other than that, it’s still Romney versus the non-Romneys.

    Santorum and Bachmann were fine, but they are done in terms of chances of winning the nomination. Ron Paul is Ron Paul.

    But the rising star again seems to be Newt.  Steve Hayward at Power Line sees Newt emerging as the non-Romney challenger, a sentiment I expressed after an earlier debate, Newt rising?  While Newt is a throw-back to the past, it’s a past when we balanced the budget, reformed welfare, and for a moment in time, appeared really to be ending the era of big government.

    Yes, I know, baggage, some of which was exposed last night such as a long-ago support of a federal health care mandate. And yes, Newt’s fundraising has left his campaign running on fumes.

    But damn, is there anyone you would rather see on stage hammering Obama other than Newt?

    Newt’s challenge of 7 three-hour debates with no moderator in Lincoln-Douglas fashion would be tremendous.  Obama would not take the challenge, of course, which itself would become a “what’s the doughboy boy afraid of” anti-Obama campaign theme.  But if by some miracle a free-wheeling debate about the past and future of the country were achieved, it would be lights out for Obama.

    Newt still is the long-shot, but not as long a shot as before the recent rounds of debates started.

    Update:  I had not seen this prior to my post, but Palin is sounding like a Newt fan, via Real Clear Politics:

    “I think we (Republicans) are more interested in substance and that’s why like tonight Newt Gingrich again I think did the best because he seems to be above a lot of the bickering that goes on,” Sarah Palin told FOX News after tonight’s CNN debate in Las Vegas.

    Everybody could learn from Newt Gingrich and the way his calm, cool, collected manner. He’s kind of seen it all before in this political game, if you will,” Palin said about Gingrich’s debate skills.

    “Newt Gingrich would — he would clobber Barack Obama in any debate, any forum that had to do with substance when it comes to policy and solutions for the challenges that America faces. Newt Gingrich would clobber Barack Obama. I don’t know if he’s going to be the one that surfaces as the fortunate candidate who gets to face Barack Obama because unfortunately, in this day and age, sometimes conventional wisdom would dictate that he who has the most money, the campaign dollars, wins. I don’t want to believe that this is going to be the case this go-around,” Palin said about a debate between Gingrich and Obama.

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    GrumpyOne | October 19, 2011 at 7:54 pm

    I disagree with assessment of Perry winning the debate.

    Be careful as to what you wish for… Look at his record in Texas and it will show that he’s soft on immigration and IN FACT could not provide the leadership for the legislature to enact E-Verify, punish sanctuary cities despite the fact that the Republicans hold a bullet proof majority in both houses of the legislature. But he did get the legislature to pass his version of the “Dream Act” way back in 2001.

    Perry is a RINO former democrat who may not have increased taxes but watch out for them thar’ “fees.”

    To obtained a closer look at how “connected” Perry is, gander on down to http://www.texasturf.org/ where much can be learned regarding ties to toll road/road construction lobby even to the point of issuing bonds with junk status. Bear in mind that “texasturf” is a very conservative group.

    As a Texas resident, I cannot find one single item that Perry has ever done to benefit the state. In a lot of ways, he resembles John Kerry to include the “good hair.”

    Again, be careful as to what you wish for!


       
       0 
       
       0
      Owen J in reply to GrumpyOne. | October 19, 2011 at 10:23 pm

      Obviously that’s because you never looked for any. I’m not a TX resident — although I know quite a few — and several are obvious to me.

      I doubt very much you are actually from TX. Please provide incontroverable proof. Then at least part of your comment will be based on fact.


     
     0 
     
     0
    BarbaraS | October 19, 2011 at 8:35 pm

    I like Cain personally but I think it would be a mistake to elect a man with no proven track record. We have that now. We know what Cain says he supports but we have no proof that he would govern that way. Obama said a lot of things he would do and reneged on just about every one of them. A politician will say and do anything to get elected. All we should go by is his/her record over the years. The lame stream media will not report any accompishments of republicans. They did not with Reagan or with Palin. They only reported trivia or made up lies. Their whole modis perandi is that our candidate has done nothing and will do nothing. They are, always have been and allways will be in the tank for the dims. Whoever our candidate is will be trashed to the max. The dims know their party is dying and they will pull out all stops to prevent this.


     
     0 
     
     0
    David R. Graham | October 20, 2011 at 12:37 am

    “I like Cain personally but I think it would be a mistake to elect a man with no proven track record. We have that now. We know what Cain says he supports but we have no proof that he would govern that way. Obama said a lot of things he would do and reneged on just about every one of them. A politician will say and do anything to get elected. All we should go by is his/her record over the years.”

    Excellent point!


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend