Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    I support the 3rd Amendment, and I vote

    I support the 3rd Amendment, and I vote

    There have been over 200 bumper sticker posts since the first post on June 24, 2010.

    We have covered the 1st, 2nd and 10th Amendments numerous times, but never the 3rd Amendment.  You know, the one that says, umm, you know, yeah I took Con Law and I teach in a law school, … the uh … Oh yeah:

    No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    As noted in this article in the, er, “press” in 2007, anti-quartering groups have a long history of successfully defending our 3rd Amendment rights:

    The National Anti- Quartering Association, America’s foremost Third Amendment rights group, held its annual gala in Washington Monday to honor 191 consecutive years of advocating the protection of private homes and property against the unlawful boarding of military personnel.

    “This is a proud day for quarters-owners everywhere,” said the organization’s president, Charles Davison, in his keynote address. “Year after year, we have sent a loud and clear message to the federal government and to anyone else who would attack our unassailable rights: Hands off our cottages, livery stables, and haylofts.”

    Apparently someone on my street in Ithaca is a 3rd Amendment fanatic, too:


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Weirddave | October 7, 2011 at 1:39 pm

    The last time my wife and I were flying, approaching the TSA checkpoint, my wife said “I should get one of those t-shirts with the 3rd Amendment printed on them in lead ink, you know, so they show up on the scans and these goons have to read it?” I said “The TSA is threatening to quarter troops in our house?”. She said “Which one am I thinking of?”. Hehe. I still tease her about protecting her “3rd Amendment rights”.

    If I remember correctly there was a Thrid Amendment case back in the Sixtys. A state sued the Federal Government for using state property without permission to quarter troops flown in for riot duty. I don’t remember the result.

    I think the last one before that was in the 19th Century.

    Hank’s Eclectic Meanderings

    […] SUPPORTING THE WHOLE CONSTITUTION: I Support The Third Amendment, And I Vote! […]

    ShootingBuddy | October 8, 2011 at 10:26 am

    How did that Third Amendment work out for ya in New Orleans during Katrina?

    largenfirm | October 8, 2011 at 5:56 pm

    Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957, was a 1982 court case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is the only significant court decision based on a direct challenge under the Third Amendment to the United States Constitution.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend