Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Palin knew Revere better than Obama knew Lincoln

    Palin knew Revere better than Obama knew Lincoln

    Obama flubbed his history.  Via Ed Morrissey, Obama inaccurately called Abraham Lincoln the founder of the Republican Party:

    Not true! Doesn’t Obama know history?

    So now the media will erupt for weeks on end about what an “idiot” and “fool” and “know-nothing” Obama is, just like it erupted over Sarah Palin’s (accurate) comments about Paul Revere?

    It’s even worse, because Palin’s (accurate) comments were made in an on-the-fly interview whereas Obama’s were in a prepared speech.

    And all the enlightened conservative pundits who bashed Palin endlessly over Revere now will denounce Obama’s historical ignorance, right?

    I know, I’m talking to myself again.

    Update:  Sarah Palin may be the one liberals have been waiting for

    Update 9-10-11:  NPR PBS has edited out the Lincoln error from its transcript of the speech (h/t Instapundit).


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    drummerboy | September 11, 2011 at 9:30 am

    good on grayamerica. he injects a fact into the cesspool, and the seepage of brainless excremeent stops, just like that.

    frikkin hilarious.


      William A. Jacobson in reply to drummerboy. | September 11, 2011 at 9:35 am

      Sounds like a couple of new commenters have come here from the ultimate cesspool blog. Fact is, Obama was wrong. Not a big deal, now we’ll wait for all the apologies to Palin (which never will come).

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend