Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    “If this was 2013, Obama might be in a different groove”

    “If this was 2013, Obama might be in a different groove”

    There is one worthwhile clause in an otherwise worthless article at The Atlantic by Steve Clemons, Obama Tells Palestinians to Stay in the Back of the Bus.

    Clemons lays out the fiction that the Palestinian strategic move to take land without peace is something Gandhi-like:

    Obama’s position on this is dangerous in another sense as well.  Obama — who looked to so many early in his rock star style rise to the Presidency as a leader on the level of a Gandhi, or Martin Luther King, or Mandela — has assured the rise of Hamas, the legitimation of violence in pursuit of Palestinian political goals, by yet again showing that peaceful, non-violent moderates like Mahmoud Abbas ultimately get nothing — even if they play the role of the “good Palestinian,” the one who listens to his masters, who doesn’t get too disturbed when humiliated at Israel’s border check points and at UN Security Council meetings.

    Obama assured the rise of Hamas?  Hamas has already risen.  Obama legitimated violence in the pursuit of Palestinian political goals? Have you been sleeping the last 60 years?  Really, can’t The Atlantic do better than this nonsense?  Bring back Andrew Sullivan, the relative voice of sanity.

    The “occupation” is the cause of all the problems?. Oh wait, Israel withdrew unilaterally from Gaza and Gaza now is an Iranian missile base. Oh wait, the effort to drive the Jews into the sea started before the 1967 war, indeed, prior to the creation of Israel; just ask the Jews who used to live in the centuries-old Jewish community in Hebron before the 1929 Arab riots and massacre. Oh wait, Hamas does not agree to the existence of Israel. Oh wait, Abbas said just a few weeks ago he never — as in never — will accept Israel as a Jewish state.

    Land for peace is risky enough; land without peace is a suicide pact.

    But there was one clause in Clemon’s piece which has a truth to it:

    If this was 2013, Obama might be in a different groove ….

    Damn right.  Let’s not forget that, for a second.

    Term No. 1 pushed Israel to the brink, the voters of NY-09 and the looming presidential election pulled it back.

    In Term No. 2, if there is one, all bets are off.


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    DINORightMarie | September 22, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    “In Term No. 2, if there is one, all bets are off.”

    So true. In every area, not just Israel and the Palestinian state.

    (How you can stand wading through the muck of The Atlantic I’ll never know; but thanks for sharing the relevant information.)

    There is World History and there is Leftist / Radical Islam Revisionist History.

    History Lesson: This is a just released video (more white board fast sketch animation) concurrent with a new book on the topic: A Century of Palestinian Rejectionism and Jew Hatred.

    This video is by the Israeli Foreign Minister, obviously by one of the protagonists……….

    Both of these seem historically correct, but skip a lot of the torturous history of the area. In a nutshell, the Arab world has been using the Palestinians as the grist in the mill to grind down Israel in their overall stated goal to destroy Israel.
    If the Palestinians get a UN recognized State, they will then use all of the unworthy refugee Palestinians they will exclude from citizenship in their new State as the grist in the mill to grind down Israel in their overall stated goal to destroy Israel. Same game, smaller area, smaller population in tighter quarters generating more pressure for the grist to work.

    I can’t imagine how Obama could have wreaked more damage in his short tenure; maximized with his complete (public) reversal at the UN from all of his previous words and actions.

    PS Is that Dwight from the Office at the podium in that earlier “Corn Dog” post?

    LukeHandCool | September 22, 2011 at 4:21 pm

    “Obama Tells Palestinians to Stay in the Back of the Bus.”

    How about he first tells them not to blow up the bus?

    orangemtl | September 22, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    “…Obama, who looked to so many to be a leader…on the level of a Gandhi, or Mandela…” really? REALLY?
    Or, maybe on the level of a Carter. Or Millard Fillmore. Or Lev Trotsky. Or Sidney the Dancing Goat.
    Good Lord, are they HONESTLY that stupid and gullible? The guy lacks the talent to run two busy restaurants in the same town at once, and he’s the political Messiah?

    No wonder the Administration returns to the same tired hack leftist talking points and proposals: because they’re used to the same, shallow leftists swallowing the hook.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend